|
|
[ Log In ] [ Register ]
 means the user is online now!
everybody be careful. On September 11th, all our lives will change.
At 1:44:34 AM on 7/20/2001, SFNE GUY said:
wow! I had to take 2 bathroom brakes!!
At 3:43:22 PM on 7/18/2001, JP1 said:
Here's Some other crap that I found at Geocities. Here is the Url-http://www.geocities.com/logosaurus/spinosaurus_vs_tyrannosaurus.htm
Go there and see it for yourself or just read it here. It's by a guy named Vital. I don't care what you think about me putting this up because, again, someone else wrote it and they aren't nessicarlly my views, okay? =]
" A battle between these two dinosaurs would never happen in reality for two main reasons. The first is that there is a geographical barrier between the two called the Atlantic ocean. Tyrannosaurus rex lived in western North America, while Spinosaurus aegyptiacus lived in northern Africa. Also, the two species were separated by about thirty million years. T. rex has been found in the Maastrichtian of the Cretaceous, from seventy to sixty five million years ago, while S. aegyptiacus is found much earlier (Cenomian?), from about ninety-seven to ninety-five million years ago.
Barring these two problems, there are other reasons a battle to the death would not ensue between these two creatures. First is that animals don't like fighting, especially animals that are of the intelligence level of dinosaurs. It wastes precious calories, and is only needed if necessary. That means that these two animals had to be in competition with one another. Which they wouldn't be. S. aegyptiacus is largely piscivorous, a fish eater. While it wasn't exclusively a fish eater, it was a large part of the diet. The most complete Baryonyx walkeri (a close relative of S. aegyptiacus) specimen has in its gut both fish scales and parts of a juvenile iguanodont, evidence that it either hunted or scavenged it. B. walkeri is a little over half of S. aegyptiacus' size, so it is presumed that S. aegyptiacus could also procure non-fish meat if needed and available. There are also ample large fish species known from S. aegyptiacus' time and area, further supporting its fishy diet. T. rex, on the other hand, hunted (there is proof of hunting!) and scavenged terrestrial animals such as hadrosaurs and ceratopsians, though, in a famine, I'm sure it would try to catch large fish, if there were any around it. The point is, these animals would not have been in competition. Also, they were both large and able to harm each other, and neither wanted that, so self preservation would be a major issue.
However, on either Isla Nublar or Sorna, the amount of food and land available to either species was severely less than they would like, and large fish of the type S. aegyptiacus hunted would not be around. This condition may bring the two into competition.
As far as this fight goes, size does not matter. A forty-five foot S. aegyptiacus versus a forty-two foot T. rex is so little a size difference that there might as well not be a size difference. The same goes for all the other large theropods: Charcarodontosaurus saharicus, Giganotosaurus carolinii, Suchomimus tenerensis, Allosaurus maximus, etc. Using the size issue is like saying, "Which would win, a lion or a tiger?" It's almost as ridiculous a question for much the same reasons as we have with these two dinosaurs. This might as well be a boxing match; in other words, the individual animal's ability is what matters, not the species. Keep that in mind when discussing which of these two dinosaurs would win.
However, there is a huge morphological difference between T. rex and S. aegyptiacus, which affects the outcome of the fight greatly.
Before delving into the morphology of S. aegyptiacus, it must be said that much of what is known about this animal is inferred from its relatives. There is very little remaining of this dinosaur after a bombing during World War II that destroyed most of the specimens. So I will say this again: There are very few fossils available of this animal, no complete skeletons, and most of the material we have are teeth. We can, however, in a lack of better data, extrapolate based on its relatives.
S. aegyptiacus was very derived as a fish eater. The skull is long, low, on a longer, slender, neck, and not reinforced for strength; it most likely measures around six to seven feet long. The nares is posteriorly shifted, probably to allow it to breathe while its snout was underwater, like many modern fishing birds. The teeth are long and conical, some with microserrations, and little to no recurvature. A rosette of teeth is on the lower jaw, with the longest teeth almost at the tip. The upper jaw has similar teeth radiations at the premaxilla and at the front of the maxillas. There is an extreme kink in the snout between the maxilla and premaxilla. There is no stereoscopic vision. The jaws were highly laterally compressed, and almost paper thin in the more primitive Suchomimus tenerensis. There may be a short crest atop the skull, as in B. walkeri.
S. aegyptiacus shared a feature with other spinosaurs that will be capitalized in JP3: a large thumb claw. This was on the first of three digits, and is a trait first seen in B. walkeri. The forearms are allosaur like, and slung below the animal. S. tenerensis shows a large olecranon process and strong, stout, shorter arms. This may be the case in S. aegyptiacus. At best, an estimate for the arms is about five feet long.
Other unique things about this animal include thoracic and caudal vertebrae that are about twice as long as on other theropods. This extended vertebral column adds a huge amount to the length of the animal. It was a laterally thin animal, and had a shallower rib cage, like compsognathids and dilophosaurs.
S. aegyptiacus has a large sail that reaches six feet at its height above the dorsal vertebrae. This sail is made of thick, elongated neural arches. There is speculation that they actually were covered by a layer of fat as a hump, but not a big, round hump as in camels. There is speculation also that the sail was a heat regulation device by those who believe S. aegyptiacus was poikilothermic. I disagree. At that size, gigantothermy is more efficient and a sail simply increases surface area. I believe this dinosaur was homeothermic and the sail, while it may have been used for heat regulation, has little bearing on the metabolic state of S. aegyptiacus.
T. rex is known from twenty peer reviewed specimens, with about four more to be studied from this past summer alone. As the star of JP and TLW, this dinosaur achieved more infamy than ever before, and JP3 may dethrone the King, so to speak.
T. rex was designed to be a big, fast big game hunter. With absolute proof of T. rex hunting, it made a good living as an opportunist, hunting or scavenging whenever necessary. The skull of T. rex can deliver more of a bite force than any living animal for sure, and is, according to Gregory M. Erickson, "the undisputed champion of bite force." The strong, short, stout, massive skull of T. rex reflects this adaptation toward power. Also, the skull shows at least a a 60% overlap in vision, well in the range for stereoscopic vision. Other features include forward pointing ears, a complex inner ear system, and olfactory bulbs that were the size of grapefruits. In other words, there is good reason to say that T. rex could smell almost as well as the turkey vulture, the animal with the largest olfactory bulbs to body size. T. rex was the owner of an amazing nose.
The legs of T. rex were designed for speed, especially compared to the shorter legs of S. aegyptiacus. While it is disputed whether T. rex could achieve a suspensory locomotory phase, a reasonable maximum walking speed is between twenty and twenty-five miles per hour. But the point is, even at twenty miles per hour, T. rex could accelerate well, and still moved faster than any of its possible prey items.
T. rex had a massive body, with a round barrel like chest. While it was massive, everyone of T. rex's vertebrae through its fourth sacral is hollow and filled with air sacs most likely connected to the lungs in an avian air sac breathing system. S. aegyptiacus most likely had had a similar system, but the fossil support is not there. Hopefully, there will be new finds soon.
Now, to the battle! The weapons involved for the S. aegyptiacus are the mouth and arms, while weapons for the T. rex are mouth and possibly legs. I don't list legs for the S. aegyptiacus, because I think that its sail made it too unwieldy to kick well.
The arms of the S. aegyptiacus are probably its best weapon. The problem is that they are slung below the body, and cannot flap. Because this animal is no kangaroo, rearing up is no possibility either. This severely restricts the use of the strong arms. (They would be good for fishing, though!) The mouth of the S. aegyptiacus isn't as strong as the T. rex's, so could not be used to the same effect.
The T. rex probably employed a run in and bite the thigh and run out attack. There is no reason to say that the S. aegyptiacus was faster or stronger than the T. rex, and I think I can say that fairly, in other words, I'm saying that not just because T. rex is my favorite.
If the S. aegyptiacus got a few scratches off on the T. rex, they were not likely to be debilitating injuries, unless an eye was gouged or a major artery. T. rex has protected eyes, though. A bite from the S. aegyptiacus would be bad, however.
If the T. rex kicked the S. aegyptiacus, there would be little laceration because T. rex had relatively blunt toe claws, but the S. aegyptiacus might fall over. Barring the injury of the S. aegyptiacus from the fall itself, this could be bad for T. rex. From the ground, the S. aegyptiacus could easily injure T. rex, especially the legs.
If the T. rex got a bite off on the S. aegyptiacus, though, there are bad repercussions. A bite that powerful does a lot of damage. And that's one major reason I say that the T. rex would win. T. rex was designed, like I said before, to take out big animals with its mouth. And that's what it would do to the S. aegyptiacus. Ability and weapons matter here, not size, and the T. rex has the advantage in both areas.
So that's my verdict, T. rex with the win!"
At 3:38:58 PM on 7/18/2001, JP1 said:
This is some stuff I found out about sue and I wanted all of you to see it too.(te-he...that rhymed)
URL-http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0873492.html
"Tyrannosaurus Sue"
"The prehistoric giant stands again"
Sue is a sensation. It's not just that she's 42 feet long and 65 million years old. She's the world's most complete, best preserved, and largest Tyrannosaurus rex skeleton, on permanent view at Chicago's Field Museum of Natural History.
"Rest in Pieces"
Amazingly, more than 200 of Sue's bones were preserved. The skeleton includes the most complete T. rex tail ever found, as well as one of only two T. rex arms ever found. Sue's skull contains the longest (and scariest) T. rex tooth yet known—it's a foot long.
One amazing discovery in Sue's skeleton is that she has a wishbone, or furcula, such as you would find in most bird skeletons. This is the first wishbone found on a T. rex. It supports the theory that birds evolved from dinosaurs, either directly or from a common ancestor.
Even though Sue's bones are more than 65 million years old, they are so well preserved that you can see marks where muscles and tendons once lay.
"Slow, But Deadly"
Studies of Sue's foot bones have indicated that T. rex probably walked at about 6 mph and ran at not more than 15 mph, much slower than previously thought.
The lead researcher on Sue says that the way the T. rex moved in the movie Jurassic Park was probably very accurate. Most likely T. rex bent over so that its huge tail did not touch the ground, and walked on its toes—T. rex is digitigrade, meaning it walks on its toes like a cat. (People are plantigrade, meaning we walk flat-footed.)
But the movie was wrong in suggesting that T. rex would have to see its prey move in order to find it—from studying Sue, researchers have determined that T. rex had an excellent sense of smell. Sue's skull reveals that in a T. rex brain the olfactory nodes were much larger than the cerebrum.
"Sue or Sir?"
Tyrannosaurus Sue was named for Sue Hendrickson, the fossil hunter who found the skeleton in 1990. But although the skeleton is generally referred to as a “she,” no one really knows whether Tyrannosaurus Sue was male or female. The skeleton's very large size could suggest that the dinosaur was female, because among birds of prey—T. rex's closest ancestors—females are generally larger than males.
"Senior Sue"
Throughout her life Sue suffered some hard knocks, including broken ribs and an injured arm. Although scientists do not know exactly what illnesses dinosaurs had, it looks as though Sue was affected by an age-related disease much like arthritis. “Here is a very, very old dinosaur that just got sick and died after a long, active life,” says John Flynn, a Field Museum paleontologist.
"Just how old was she?"
Scientists don't know for sure how long a T. rex might have lived. Says Flynn, “We know turtles and crocodiles can live to 150 years, and they are cold-blooded. We know some birds, which are warm-blooded, can live for many decades. My guess is that dinosaurs could live for decades, some 100 years or more.”
"Queen of the Dinosaurs"
For many of the researchers who have gotten to know Sue, the discovery of the massive T. rex was the event of a lifetime. “It's truly a dream fossil,” says Tony Wentz, who worked to dig Sue out of the ground and helped prepare her skeleton for the exhibit. “It's the best of the best, the biggest, the most well-preserved. Everything you could ever want in digging a dinosaur was in Sue.”
"Tyrannosaurus rex"
Classification
(Kingdom)-(Animalia)-(animal)
(Phylum)-(Chordata)-(has a nerve cord ending at a brain)
(Class)-(Archosauria)-(has hollow teeth, special ankles, pointy head)
(Order)-(Saurischia)-("lizard-hipped")
(Suborder)-(Theropoda)-(walks on two feet, eats meat)
(Family)-(Tyrannosauroidea)-(a predator with tiny forelimbs \ "arms")
(Genus)-(Tyrannosaurus)-("tyrant lizard")
(Species)-(rex)-("king")
I would like to mention that I did not write this and the views therin are not nessicarilly mine. my thanks to infoplease.com for providing the information stated above.
At 12:59:49 PM on 7/18/2001, Jackass said:
I'm back, good retaliation jarassicchic. Obviously I underestimated you. I'll take your word for it.
At 9:49:30 AM on 7/18/2001, cooperrules said:
Hey guys, since I started all this, I might as well end it too. I wish that everyone would just get back to talkin' about JP3, okay.
At 9:05:07 AM on 7/18/2001, cooperrules said:
Sorry, and yes I can have peace in my life. Most of the time I always do. Thanks for the comment.
At 9:00:03 AM on 7/18/2001, jurassicchic31 said:
But in regards to your earlier comment...I am not vulnerable.
At 8:58:59 AM on 7/18/2001, jurassicchic31 said:
No, I am not making fun of you. Can't you have peace in your life?
:)
At 8:53:19 AM on 7/18/2001, cooperrules said:
Is that a good thing, or are you just makin' fun of me?
At 8:12:36 AM on 7/18/2001, jurassicchic31 said:
Got nothing but love for you COOPER baby!!!!
At 8:12:07 AM on 7/18/2001, jurassicchic31 said:
FYI - T-Rex, I am not French, I am Italian. And I am far from a whore. And I am not 60, I am 28.
You should really shut up when you have no idea.
At 7:59:13 AM on 7/18/2001, cooperrules said:
Hey, I like pickin' fights with anyone that's vulnerable, so yeah, your right about me, Hitman.
At 1:21:10 AM on 7/18/2001, T-REX#1 said:
She's probably a 60 year old French whore!!!
At 1:04:53 AM on 7/18/2001, Hitmanasaurus said:
It means you pick fights with women and you're proud of it.Maybe if you didn't,you might have lost your virginity by now.You're the reason men get a bad rep.
At 12:41:56 AM on 7/18/2001, T-REX#1 said:
Sorry it was 'When Dinosaurus Roamed America' that said it hehe :-)
At 12:35:28 AM on 7/18/2001, T-REX#1 said:
Well on 'Walking With Dinosaurus' they said the T-Rex was still the best and the king of the hill even though the Spino is bigger the T-Rex's teeth are build to crack bone when the Spino's are only ment to tear flesh and they also said the T-Rex's jaw was much more powerful than the Spino's. (SO EAT IT SPINO FANS THE T-REX IS BETTER) peace out!
At 11:50:46 PM on 7/17/2001, sshideler said:
Maybe Dan should kick off the bull shitters off the sight, this isnt a IM argument sight. Grow up all.
At 10:57:32 PM on 7/17/2001, jurassicchic31 said:
At 10:41:00 PM on 7/17/2001, pepeandi said:
I don't think that the Spinosaurus could beat the t-rex because the t-rex is much more taller that the spinosaurus, second the t-rex is more powerfull and the spinosaurus isn't, and third with one bite of the t-rex in the neck of the spinosaurus, in few seconds the spinosaurus is going to fall down dead because the t-rex theeth is 15 inch tall so its going to brake all the bones in its neck and if don't beliave me go to "Jack Honer page"
At 10:40:21 PM on 7/17/2001, pepeandi said:
I don't think that the Spinosaurus could beat the t-rex because the t-rex is much more taller that the spinosaurus, second the t-rex is more powerfull and the spinosaurus and third with one bite of the t-rex in the neck of the spinosaurus, in few seconds the spinosaurus is going to fall down dead because the t-rex theeth is 15 inch tall so its going to brake all the bones in its neck and if don't beliave me go to "Jack Honer page"
At 9:55:21 PM on 7/17/2001, jurassicchic31 said:
Cooper, you did not scare me away....I left work and took a long drive in my new ride. :) When 4:00 comes around....my computer sleeps for the night!
At 9:50:32 PM on 7/17/2001, jurassicchic31 said:
But i am pretty damn cute with a nice set of raptor eggs....if ya know what I mean. :) :P YEAH BABY!!!!
I am woman...hear me shop!!!
At 9:48:06 PM on 7/17/2001, jurassicchic31 said:
People, people......
Okay - for start, I did not start an argument with you TYRANORAPTOR. I was being frisky as I stated earlier..you big cry baby. :P <----Notice the face, I am playing again.
Cooper....how dare you call yourself an idiot. Shame on you, maybe you need a spanking. ;)
Jackass - your name suits you well. :P We all consider hot to be something different. Some women think Harrison For or Mel Gibson are hot.... I DON'T. No attraction there. I personally think that Mark Consuleos, Stephen Baldwin (as a blond) and Stephen Dorff are hot. Two totally different types of men.
Men, may think the bimbo type is hot (ie: Pamela Lee and Carmen Electra) where some men think naturally pretty women are hot (ie: Sandra Bullock, Kirstie Alley and Halle Berry.)
I happen to be a natural person. I am married and don't really seek the opinions of other men, but I am told quite often that I am very attractive by other men. That does not make me hot in other's opinions if they are attracted to the plastic/bimbo types. Explaination enough? I thought so.
Just because I do not have an ego or I am not conceited does not make heads or tells if I am HOT or not.
At 9:33:39 PM on 7/17/2001, cooperrules said:
Hey, Hitmanasaurus, what's that supposed to mean?
At 9:12:03 PM on 7/17/2001, Hitmanasaurus said:
OOOoooo,big man scared off the girl.What did she do,look at you?
At 9:05:02 PM on 7/17/2001, cooperrules said:
Hey guys, I think we scared jurassichic away from this site.
At 8:59:52 PM on 7/17/2001, pepeandi said:
hey don't forget that this movie was Spielberg idea not Joe
At 7:08:58 PM on 7/17/2001, Tyranoraptor said:
hey jurassicchic, why were you starting a fight with me earlier? I started to cry and you hurt my feelings :-(
At 5:38:21 PM on 7/17/2001, Jackass said:
Okay obviously she's not hot if she had to ask what someone considered hot. If she was hot, she would know it.
At 5:09:49 PM on 7/17/2001, ectocooler said:
that rex looks so fake.
At 4:58:41 PM on 7/17/2001, cooperrules said:
Okay, sorry. I'm not usually like that with ladies. And as far as being impatient, I guess I'm just a little bit of an idiot at times. Sorry again.
At 4:53:08 PM on 7/17/2001, jurassicchic31 said:
I did not start an argument. I was being frisky. As far as being hot....well, I replied...depends on what you consider hot!!!!!
At 4:52:31 PM on 7/17/2001, jurassicchic31 said:
You are mighty impatient there aren't you cooper?
At 4:51:20 PM on 7/17/2001, cooperrules said:
damnit, I want an answer
At 4:43:51 PM on 7/17/2001, cooperrules said:
Hey, jurassichic, you got somethin' goin' on tha board. First, you got in an argument, then you got Stegasaurus askin if you're hot!!!!! What gives????
At 4:17:50 PM on 7/17/2001, jurassicchic31 said:
Depends on what you consider hot!!!!!
At 4:10:31 PM on 7/17/2001, Cuckoo said:
Dear God...I knew it was only a matter of time when a female made her presence known that someone would want to know if she was hot...:-P
At 4:07:33 PM on 7/17/2001, Stegasaurus said:
Are you hot Jurassichic?
At 3:55:17 PM on 7/17/2001, jurassicchic31 said:
Regarding the books........ I thought the JP book was far more exciting as far as interaction with dinos and all of that is concerned, but I read the original screenplay and it was nowhere near as exciting as the screenplay as it was acted out. I think if they tried to make the movie from the JP book, they would not be able to make a JP3 today. Good job headwriters for considering that.
NOW, The Lost World was a fantastic book. better than the first in my opinion, however, the movie did not do justice to the brilliant story that MC wrote. I was looking forward to the Chamelon Dinos and all of the action with the families of Raptors. Supposedly (SPOILER...STOP READING IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO KNOW)......JP3 is supposed to bring out some of that beauty in the 2nd book, that was foolishly omitted in the movie. You know what's sad? As much as they can do with CGI these days, you would think that that movie would have been more like the book. Can you imagine the money it would have made then? I know we will not be disappointed tomorrow.
At 3:38:11 PM on 7/17/2001, JP1 said:
Yes, I aggree w/ you there. The whole San Diego scene was stupid. They should have just ended the movie when the Helicopter was taking them off the island or something like that. And as for all of the scientists that went... that was "kind" of stupid. I mean it was realistic that after the first jurassic park that something like that was going to happen. I think that it needed to be closer to Michael Chrichton's book. Did you read the book? if you did i'm sure (from what I'm hearing) you'd like the book alot more than the movie.
At 3:01:23 PM on 7/17/2001, T-REX#1 said:
JP1 look at your name! It sucked because of the whole San Diego thing where the T-Rex ran loose around the city COMMON!!! And where everyone knew the dinosaurus existed instead of it being a secret like in the 1st Jurassic Park. It was all a huge joke to Jurassic Park fans. (I was pissed!!!)
At 2:56:20 PM on 7/17/2001, Cuckoo said:
It's entirely possible that, if they had ever met, Spinosaurus could beat T.rex and vice-versa. It's fun to speculate, but in all honesty, I don't think that big predators often engage in mortal combat (or Mortal Kombat, for that matter). There would have been a lot of noise and posturing and so forth, but probably not a lot of biting. However, if a T.rex got a good bite in on the neck, it would pretty much have the fight won, in my opinion, while Spinosaurus would have a little tougher time of it, based on potential bite strength alone. But it's a mistake to sell Spinosaurus short in a fight just because he might have eaten more fish than your average dino. Bears eat lots of fish compared to lions, but I'd give the bear better odds in a fight with the lion.
At 1:29:26 PM on 7/17/2001, jurassicchic31 said:
And Tyranoraptor, BTW - I am a ma'am, not man. Jurassichic..chic...not Jurassicdude, or Jurassicman, or jurassicboy or even Jurassicd**k, that was Jurassicchic.
BTW - Great Website Dan!
At 1:27:41 PM on 7/17/2001, jurassicchic31 said:
me too! ;)
At 1:17:39 PM on 7/17/2001, Tyranoraptor said:
Hey relax man, im just bustin your chops
At 1:12:00 PM on 7/17/2001, jurassicchic31 said:
Damn it Tyranoraptor. Read the rest of the posts where others have claimed to have seen the movie and those two die before you start bitching at me. I never claimed to see the movie, as you will notice from my previous post. If they can BS one way, I will excercise my right to BS another. DAMN IT!!!
At 11:33:02 AM on 7/17/2001, Tyranoraptor said:
damnit jurassicchik, how would you know? and even if you did why would you spoil it for us
At 10:19:21 AM on 7/17/2001, jurassicchic31 said:
Grant Does not get eaten and neither does Tea Leoni!
At 10:13:03 AM on 7/17/2001, david.c said:
Yikes Calum. I'm in Ireland and just have to wait till Friday, two days late. I'm lucky.
At 9:59:58 AM on 7/17/2001, H.B.M.C. said:
Well, after watching those clips, I can definately say all the skeptisicm I've had over the years is gone.
"No body move a muscle!" - A. Grant
At 9:29:04 AM on 7/17/2001, spino7 said:
jurassic fart what is up wit u spoilin the movie for people who didn't give in to temtation
At 9:19:56 AM on 7/17/2001, Jurassic Fart said:
That was AWWWsome when Sam Neil got ate by the SPino! I can't wait to see it on the big screen!
At 8:35:48 AM on 7/17/2001, jurassicchic31 said:
I bought my tickets last night. I am so hyped. These clips are really good. Well, excellent to be exact. I look forward to Wednesday. Thanks for the link Dan.
At 6:38:39 AM on 7/17/2001, SpinoRaptorRex said:
cold someone like explain the clips without toooooooo much detail plz.
At 5:00:25 AM on 7/17/2001, ash1968 said:
Market stall near me (Hong Kong) was selling video copies of JP3 for 4 US dollars last night - I was a good boy and did NOT buy one - didn't want to spoil it for myself - but no more clips please!!! - Ash.
At 4:46:52 AM on 7/17/2001, smugjp3 said:
Hell yeah, i saw the movie, and it was fucking bull. i am so extremely dissapointed. i waited so long for this movie, i feel like i have been raped, joe johnston should be banned from america, the only good part was that they killed off Tea Leoni!!!
At 2:30:36 AM on 7/17/2001, JP1 said:
T-Rex#1, why didn't you like JP2. We saw more dino's in it. I admit that it wasn't as much of a thriller as the first Jurassic Park but I think it was still a good movie. (except for kelly...she did suck ass)
At 2:14:48 AM on 7/17/2001, SFNE GUY said:
that 42 days! hmmm... maybe you should fly here.
At 1:55:34 AM on 7/17/2001, SFNE GUY said:
august 30th GOOD LORD!!! wow that must suck! i already have my tickets!
At 1:36:32 AM on 7/17/2001, calum said:
THIS IS KILLING ME I LIVE IN AUSTRALIA AND HAVE TO WAIT TILL AUGUST 30th TO SEE JP3 SOMEONE GIVE ME A PLANE TICKET TO THE US PLEASE!
At 1:35:57 AM on 7/17/2001, BigEyedFish said:
Look at this big eyed fish, swimin' in the sea, dreams he wants to be a bird, swoopin' divin' free. Then one he counted a big blue wave up onto the beach and now he's dead you see....a fish's dream should stay in the sea.
At 1:35:11 AM on 7/17/2001, calum said:
I'M NOT KIDDING GET ME A PLAIN TICKET NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!
At 1:32:53 AM on 7/17/2001, calum said:
THIS IS KILLING ME I LIVE IN AUSTRALIA AND HAVE TO WAIT TILL AUGUST 30th TO SEE JP3 SOMEONE GIVE ME A PLAIN TICKET TO THE US PLEASE!
At 1:26:49 AM on 7/17/2001, SFNE GUY said:
ITS NOT JUST A WALK IN THE PARK.
At 1:23:17 AM on 7/17/2001, SFNE GUY said:
IN 24 HOURS..... WE SHALL BE IN PARIDISE!!!!!!!!
At 12:45:04 AM on 7/17/2001, T-REX#1 said:
I just want to say the 1st Jurassic Park was one of my favorite movies of all time but the Lost World SUCKED ASS and this one looks a lot better just by the commercials!!!
At 12:13:24 AM on 7/17/2001, Trillian said:
ONE DAY ON THE COUNTDOWN!!!!
ONE DAY ONE DAY ONE DAYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!
At 12:03:50 AM on 7/17/2001, NoOnesWorthIt said:
I've seen it in it's Entirety and it beats the PANTS off of the Lost World!
At 11:50:06 PM on 7/16/2001, SFNE GUY said:
thats cool.
At 11:39:55 PM on 7/16/2001, Stegasaurus said:
I'm not watching any more clips. It'll spoil the whole godamn thing. Does anyone know that there is suppose to be a fight between the Ankylosaurus and the Raptors?
At 11:32:52 PM on 7/16/2001, poopoo said:
poop
At 9:43:25 PM on 7/16/2001, Grimlock said:
I'm downloading all the clips, but i'm not watching 'em until i get back from the theatre on wednesday..just one more day..it won't be that hard..i hope..
At 9:38:18 PM on 7/16/2001, jurrasic bug said:
WILL THESE CLIPS SHOW (or rather not show) SOME MERCY ON US POOR JP FANS TRYING TO WAIT FOR THE MOVIE!
At 9:29:00 PM on 7/16/2001, Overaptor said:
WHO HAS SEEN THE 12th JP3 COMMERCIAL? THE ONE WITH MORE CLIPS OF THE "BIG FIGHT" (SPINO KNOCKING OVER TREE, T-REX HEAD BUTTING SPINO, ETC) it is pretty nifty!
-David Nadeau
At 8:33:44 PM on 7/16/2001, Jurassic Fart said:
hey, everyone send a thank you to Dan for his site.
At 7:34:52 PM on 7/16/2001, tyranosaurus-R said:
what is E daily news, i figured it was extra but they have said nothing about jp3.
At 7:14:58 PM on 7/16/2001, SFNE GUY said:
I JUST CANT STOP!! IM TRYING NOT TO WATCH BUT CANT!!!!!!!!! MWAAHAHWAHA
At 6:43:01 PM on 7/16/2001, Dr. Ian Malcolm said:
did u hear that raptor call holly sweet!
At 6:40:33 PM on 7/16/2001, eggy said:
CAN'T.... WATCH.... CLIPS!!!!
At 5:55:35 PM on 7/16/2001, Jurassic Fart said:
man that was cool when the spino ate Dr. Grant
At 5:55:09 PM on 7/16/2001, Jurassic Fart said:
we've seen all these clips
At 5:48:15 PM on 7/16/2001, Rob_Redwing said:
I think "Raptor Attack!" is freaking cool. When it looks...ah...I won't spoil it...
Peace.
Rob
At 5:25:31 PM on 7/16/2001, DH4 said:
DON'T WATCH THE CLIPS JP FANS. IF YOU DO YOU WILL NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO LOOK FORWARD TO ON WEDNESDAY. THE ANTICIPATION WILL KEEP YOU EXCITED TRUST ME!
At 5:06:38 PM on 7/16/2001, Overaptor said:
AAAAAHHHHHHH!!!! STOP SENDING CLIPS! U KNOW WE R COMPELLED TO LOOK AT THEM! DARN YOU DARN YOU ALL!!!!!!
At 5:00:53 PM on 7/16/2001, Darknodin said:
YOU WILL DIE!!!!!
At 4:11:21 PM on 7/16/2001, Stegasaurus said:
Danm You!! No just joki'n I really don't care if I'm second.
At 4:10:12 PM on 7/16/2001, Stegasaurus said:
2nd bitch 2nd!! That T-Rex is pretty cool!
At 4:10:11 PM on 7/16/2001, goldrex said:
did i sa y rex i ment spino
At 4:05:25 PM on 7/16/2001, goldrex said:
MAn that is sweet yeah!!
the rex might have a little snack soon hehehe
Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment
|
|
Add DJP3P to your newsreader!
|
