|
|
[ Log In ] [ Register ]
 means the user is online now!
Ebert gave JP three stars only based on effects, much like he recommended The Haunting because of the impressive house.
I guess him giving it a passing grade because of effects is better than no passing grade at all.
At 5:14:57 PM on 7/9/2001, leatherface said:
ebert like the first jp movie but dislike the second one.
At 4:37:21 PM on 7/9/2001, SFNE GUY said:
I bet you would like to give it to roger up the ass!!!
At 3:20:32 PM on 7/9/2001, SFNE GUY said:
SHUT THE HELL UP SUCKJOY!WHAT ARE YOU, HIS BITCH?! his reviews suck he gives bad movies good reviews and good ones bad ones, IT SUCKS!!
At 3:09:41 PM on 7/9/2001, ellersaur said:
Excellent work, RaptorHunter! You had me rollin on that one! Very clever.
At 3:08:04 PM on 7/9/2001, angel_89 said:
I agree with Raptor Rampage.
At 2:27:57 PM on 7/9/2001, Raptor Hunter said:
Jurassic Theory, when you say the movie is a turkey, I must agree with you. You're right it does look like a turkey. A six foot turkey. So let's say you go to the movies to see this "turkey", and there it is, likely bobing it's head, and you stare at it looking at the spino trash the plane and you're thinking, "This is shit!" when the attack comes from the side, the other two movies you didn't even know were there. You see, like raptors these movies are pack hunters, you diss one, the others attack. You badmouth this movie on almost all posts regarding it. You are undeserving, you should not be here, and if you really want to badmouth do it somwhere else, because it is not appriciated here, why don't you make your own website, and badmouth it there? But again you diss the movie, and it just might come back to bite you in the ass. So please, try to show a little respect.
At 12:31:54 PM on 7/9/2001, serjoi7 said:
(Re:@A.I.)omigod. . I thought they were aliens.
About the reviews though: well the majority of critics are usually right. They don't just watch the movie, they think about how much better (if at all) it could've been made. It is POSSIBLE to have a JPseries movie that has meaningful character development, an intricate plausible plot, groundbreaking aesthetics (not just more and different dinos), and still be a tickler of a movie. . . all at the same time.
WE (I) will still love this movie. It'll be great cuz it will have realistic dinosaurs! Isn't that all we want? The critics want a little more. . ;) thats all.
At 9:35:14 AM on 7/9/2001, tyranosaurus-R said:
i think if there is any cut last scene where the t-rex comes back to kill the spino should be added to the dvd because most people that see this movie will be upset that the t-rex looses
At 2:40:36 AM on 7/9/2001, Suckjoy said:
SNFE GUY- Dont you EVER talk about my Roger that way. He is a loyal, good man. You're the fat piece of crap. I bet you wish you could give it to the raptors up the ass.
At 1:29:33 AM on 7/9/2001, SFNE GUY said:
i was looking at roger eberts page and he didnt even like the first two! FAT PIECE OF CRAP!!
At 12:59:13 AM on 7/9/2001, Hunter 13 said:
I just hope that whene JP3 makes it's premier on tv it dosent go to fox like the lost world, thats how you could really tell that it was bad, because the lost world was never shown on the more dignified channle like NBC.
At 12:42:41 AM on 7/9/2001, Andyb said:
That guy can shove it up his ass i know it will be good and many critics agree with me
At 12:24:03 AM on 7/9/2001, gwangi said:
Could someone point 'funkmasterflex' in the direction of another website. He must have got here by accident looking for Star Wars Nerds.
At 12:16:20 AM on 7/9/2001, gwangi said:
It is from someone who thinks Dumb and Dumber is one of the 'finer movies of all time'.
At 12:07:27 AM on 7/9/2001, funkmasterflex said:
JP3 makes me want to poo in my pants. Simply put I would rather watch a dog urinate on your pet hamster then watch it.
At 11:54:09 PM on 7/8/2001, dingodonkey said:
JP3, simply put, looks like an unfounded sellout attempt. Most of you are just such die-hard fans (as am I, don't get me wrong), that you think it an atrocity to criticize anything relating to JP.
At 10:27:16 PM on 7/8/2001, gwangi said:
Children, calm down! he movie is still 10 days away so why make up your minds already? Let's face facts, neither of the previous 2 were perfect and no doubt JP3 won't be either. The original astonished on release (mainly because dinosaurs were seen 'realistically' for the first time) and whilst it still stands up on it's own as a movie, it has some irritating moments and even more irritating kids. Likewise TLW only more so. I watched TLW again recently to get in the mood for JP3 and aside from a couple of quality scenes, it isn't a classic. What we lot probably want (less kids, more adult orientated action) we ain't never going to get - this isn't the Alien franchise - these are family movies. Let's just hope that it's a quality summer 'popcorn' movie.
At 9:35:15 PM on 7/8/2001, Jurassic theory said:
Slightly better than the Lost World? The reviews for Jurassic Park 3 are worse. Face it, the movie is a turkey.
At 8:52:13 PM on 7/8/2001, Anthony said:
*by Micheal Crichton
At 8:51:56 PM on 7/8/2001, Anthony said:
They should have used the ending from the novel "The Lost World" my Micheal Crichton - where they find a boat in a shack and ride it to the mainland.
I read the reviews and I'm not overly surprized. They are mixed, mostly leaning towards "slightly better than the Lost World."
I liked The Lost World, but it wasn't in the same league as Jurassic Park. So this review makes me happy. I still have the original The Lost World movie poster hanging in my house.
+Reminder Tuesday the score is coming out!!!
At 8:34:02 PM on 7/8/2001, Stegasaurus said:
Raptor Rampage you are the shit! I love you! Same thing with Raptor Hunter. Jurassic Theory probably doesn't even know about dinosaurs and is just here to piss everyone off. And if anybody else gives their opinion about JP3, JP2, or whatever, they can suck my dick!!
At 8:20:56 PM on 7/8/2001, jp3kev said:
THe people in Jurassic Park 3 are: Alan Grant, Billy Brennan, Ben, Paul Kirby,
Amanda Kirby, Erik Kirby,
Nash, Cooper, Udesky,
Ellie Sattler, Her Husband,
And her three year old son
Charlie.
At 8:06:32 PM on 7/8/2001, jp3kev said:
The Dinosaurs in Jurassic Park 3 are: Brachiosaurus,Velociraptor, Spinosaurus, Ankylosaurus,
T-Rex,Compsognathus,
Parasourolophus,
Corithosaurus,Ptranadon,
Carnatourus.Possibly Stegasaurus,and Triceratops.
At 7:57:57 PM on 7/8/2001, Overaptor said:
Okay, what is your problem? What did I ever do to you? I will not carry on this argument, for I feel it is very foolish and childish.
-David Nadeau
At 7:28:09 PM on 7/8/2001, Suckjoy said:
Overapter- you make me sick with your "Im confused" BULLSHIT!!!
At 7:20:01 PM on 7/8/2001, Overaptor said:
uh, now I'm just confused.
-David Nadeau
At 7:09:13 PM on 7/8/2001, velocirapteryx said:
no, what i was saying that didn't do with the topic is your name and i'm sorry for the mix-up.
At 7:09:04 PM on 7/8/2001, Suckjoy said:
Did you know that the black leather jacket Ian Malcom (played by Rory Sporman) wore during the first JP is my grand mothers. She knew Steven Speilberg and Glen Hunt!!! She hit him once. Glen not Steven. But I wish I had balls like her. She's got the biggest package.
At 6:49:36 PM on 7/8/2001, Overaptor said:
It has plenty to do with the topic... if you read the reviews, that is.
-David Nadeau
and no, there is another user here called Oviraptor.
At 6:45:56 PM on 7/8/2001, furtim said:
Come now, let's all be reasonable.
*remembers where he is*
Oh, right. Nevermind, then. Carry on.
At 6:38:05 PM on 7/8/2001, velocirapteryx said:
Overaptor this has nothing to do with the topic but does your name keep changing from i to e.Just wondering.
At 6:33:03 PM on 7/8/2001, Overaptor said:
i think they should have taken more time to develop and organize this movie. Sure we might have to wait a month or two longer, but at least we would have a really good movie. oh well, i'm sure it will still be great.
-David Nadeau
At 6:21:24 PM on 7/8/2001, RaptorRampage said:
EVERYONE NEEDS TO SIT DOWN, BACK UP, AND SHUT UP! HAS THE MOVIE COME OUT? NO!...SO IT DOESN'T MATTER IF YOU'VE READ THE SCRIPT OF YOU HAVE GUT INSTINCT OR IF U ARE FOLLOWING BEHIND THE CRITICS...WE ALL SHOULD NOT BE TALKIN UNTIL IT COMES OUT! THE JURASSIC PARK SCRIPT HAS MORE/LESS LINES THEN THE ACTUAL MOVIE...SO SOMEONE COULD HAVE READ JUST THE SCRIPT AND SAID " THIS IS GONNA SUCK" WHEN IT ROCKED
BY READING A SCRIPT, YOU DON'T SEE OR HEAR, OR ANYTHING THE MOVIE IS GONNA BE LIKE...SEE IT FOR URSELF...
AND WHO IS WITH ME WHEN I SAY
JP THEORY....SHOVE UR LITTLE AGGRIVATING ANNOYING CHILDISH EGO AND INTELLIGNECE UP UR ASS...CAUSE YOU ARE IN THE WRONG PLACE AT THE WRONG TIME DUDE!!!!!!!!!!
At 6:16:09 PM on 7/8/2001, RaptorRampage said:
umm.....i feel the same way nails2xx feels! took the words right out of my mouth
At 6:07:52 PM on 7/8/2001, leatherface said:
who cares what critics say is there opione just go see the movie for your self and enjoy it or dislike it.
At 5:49:21 PM on 7/8/2001, velocirapteryx said:
that would kinda be a repeat of what happened in the first Jurassic Park (when the rex comes back and kills the raptors).
At 5:41:31 PM on 7/8/2001, tyranosaurus-R said:
the movie would be alot better if the rex did come back at the end and kill the spino
At 5:40:39 PM on 7/8/2001, Nails2xx said:
I feel that I have to place my thoughts in here for the first time since I joined this site a month or so ago. I hope you open mindedly read what I have to say and respond respectfully.
Jurassic Park; A groundbreaking film. A film genre that never had been attempted and executed successfully before. It was fresh and new to our world. So what do people do when something fresh and new hits stores shelves? They consume, of course, as much as possible. Same with this movie. That’s why it is considered great. Don’t get me wrong, I also believe it is great and one of the best movies ever made. I can’t help feel, however, that I like it because it was new to me.
The Lost World; A film up against flamethrowers and sentry guns. A movie that was, and still is, battered because of its plot, among other things. Wait a minute. Lets see why we attacked the plot. What did the first have going for it that had it out for the second? The freshness. The newness. The world that had never been explored. The world of dinosaurs. The Lost World really wasn’t new to us, and since it wasn’t new to us, we found ways to look past the magical world of dinos and find ways to raise what was new on a pedestal. Think about it, if The Lost World came first and the roles reversed, we would love it. But no. It’s now just a movie, a sequel, something old, so lets pick it apart like a movie should be. JP1 was not picked apart because, alas, it was new. I have to agree that there was more to be picked apart in TLW than the first, however, I can’t help feeling that way because I am looking for a way for JP1 to remain supreme.
After practicing what I preach, I find The Lost World an excellent movie in its own content and category. It carried us along the journey of unrestricted living dinosaurs on an island with almost no human interference. Jurassic Park was excellent because it introduced us into something magical, something new, something unimaginable. They both have sentimental value.
Now the third installment levitates in the near future and it faces worse critiques and expectations than the second. I bet it will be a great movie in what it is trying to accomplish. The First was to introduce discuss the ignorance in bringing extinct animals back. The Second was to explore and play with nature. Third seems to demonstrate the intelligence of these animals as well as entertain. So people, please think out as to why your opinions are what they are. Explore your observations. Don’t jump to conclusions. Don’t be quick to judge unless you fully investigate your analysis and answer the questions: what is the problem on hand, what am I trying to decide, have I thoroughly observed all possibilities, and why have I come to this decision? All these questions should come to mind when reviewing, or previewing for that matter, a movie. So let’s give Jurassic Park 3 a chance, and see what it is all about.
At 5:06:53 PM on 7/8/2001, Raptor Hunter said:
I have to say personally I really liked TLW, that was one and still is one of my favorate movies of all time. Critics just don't like movies, they give a 5/5 every two months, and badmouth everything else. Come on are you gonna listen to people who liked the land before time? Oh and Jurassic Theory should burn in hell.
At 4:54:59 PM on 7/8/2001, gwsim said:
I think all of the people on this site should see the movie for themselves before making profound statements about JP///'s quality. Personally, I'm going into the theater with an open mind.
At 3:21:09 PM on 7/8/2001, velocirapteryx said:
i think they're fucking bashin' the movie so it'll do bad. Because most people listen to that fat-ass Ebert and that dumb ass Roeper(they're critics if you didn't know).
At 3:14:59 PM on 7/8/2001, The_Prowler said:
Man, people certainly don't respect opinions anymore... and I'm not speaking for all of you, let's have that clear... btw, I like JP3.
At 3:13:35 PM on 7/8/2001, TS146 said:
I am dissapointed. The T-Rex should kill the Spinosaurus. As said befor the Rex is king.
Theres no JP movie with out the Rex.
At 3:07:05 PM on 7/8/2001, Harding On said:
All of this was expected! And I said it over and over again about the T-Rex not being back at the end!
At 3:05:45 PM on 7/8/2001, angel_89 said:
I thought both JP and Lost World were awesome movies and i watch them as much as i can so i think JP3 will be awesome to and i dont care what any critic says or what Jurrasic theroy thinks, this movie is going to rock.
At 2:38:42 PM on 7/8/2001, JPIIIMAN said:
The ending sounds sucky
No big fight? UGHHH!! I have a feeling this is gonna suck. Another Lost World.
At 2:22:57 PM on 7/8/2001, SuperJonk said:
10 more days!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
At 2:11:03 PM on 7/8/2001, RaptorHiss said:
Why you hate it?
At 2:10:27 PM on 7/8/2001, RaptorHiss said:
Why don't you go somewhere else and bash JP///, this seat is reserved for people who like JP///.I respect your opinion but after the first 20 times saying you think it's crap, I got the message ok!We know you don't like it so you don't need to keep arguing.And by the way give me a good answer not just some excuse.
At 1:54:29 PM on 7/8/2001, metal.c said:
first of all TLW got terrible reviews and critics hated it.
but personally i dont care if they liked it or not cus it DID suck! the movie just sucked. little girl kicks a 500 kg raptor to some spikes , t-rex in the mainland , those were terrible scenes and there was no plot.
and what was that wait wait wait bullshit at the end of it? the movie really sucked.
i think jp3 will suck as well cus generaly i agree with critics.
i heard one of u say that godzilla was actually good , well go buy a brain
At 1:46:59 PM on 7/8/2001, Jurassic theory said:
Yes ladies and gentlemen, the person Jurassic Park 3 is made for. The kind that has the mother dress them in the morning.
At 1:36:45 PM on 7/8/2001, Stegasaurus said:
Who thinks Jurassic Theory is a fucki'n moron?
At 1:34:25 PM on 7/8/2001, Jurassic theory said:
Like i said before, The Lost World had it's problems but it still was a great movie. There was a purpose behind it, and it was a great follow up to the original. I would even say that it was better than the first in some levels. But Jurassic Park 3 looks like crap, and the story has no bearing to the first two films at all. I am a Die hard Jurassic Park Fan but come on, this one looks really bad.
At 1:29:10 PM on 7/8/2001, g0d said:
fuck all critics, don't judge the movie by other people's eyes. I suggest everyone judge's the movie with there own eyes and not these faggot old men.
At 1:24:06 PM on 7/8/2001, Cheetah167 said:
More critics like TLW than those who disliked it. So don't start this TLW sucked shit.
-Scott
At 1:07:14 PM on 7/8/2001, dingodonkey said:
No, JP2's crappiness has no bearing on JP3 at all. I'm judging by script exerpts, reviews, general knowledge of the plot, previews, and comments made by Johnston, etc. It looks more like a non-stop action movie than anything else. Something just to get a bunch of dinos running around chasing people and dazzling the audience. Read JP1, watch JP1, you don't get that kind of feeling. You get an in-depth plot with actual points to it.
I don't go by the opinions of the reviewers at all, after all, Dumb and Dumber is one of the finer movies of all time (:-D), and I doubt THAT got 5 stars! I go by the plot, which, I have read in-depth descriptions of. I don't care what Bob thought of the script, I have my own thoughts, and, from what I've seen, they're crap.
At 12:59:50 PM on 7/8/2001, Stegasaurus said:
MightyT-Rex is right. Dingodonkey, you're wrong. JP3 does not look like total crap it looks like THE CRAP. Just because TLW wasn't the greatest doesn't mean that the 3rd one will be bad.
At 12:48:11 PM on 7/8/2001, Mighty T-rex said:
Hey, people who've reviewed the script like Bob, who's somebody we can relate with, instead of old geezer critics, said it had good character development, better than that of TLW, Dingodonkey.
At 12:46:47 PM on 7/8/2001, raptor0o7 said:
review brought to you by the people who thought Crouching tiger hidden dragon had a great plot (I didnt even realize there was one!)...heh
At 12:45:31 PM on 7/8/2001, Mighty T-rex said:
Critics didn't like TLW, but TLW ROCKED!!! Most critics liked JP, but there were a few mixed and negative reviews for it. Don't forget, they gave JP3 3 out of 5 stars, when TLW only got 2. It isn't true that JP3's getting especially bad reviews. And Jurassic Theory, I've never seen The Haunting, but Godzilla was excellent, and it had bad reviews.
Either way, I've only read 3 of the total number of reviews there have been, so don't expect me to know exactly what they said.
At 12:44:02 PM on 7/8/2001, dingodonkey said:
I saw JP because of it's good character development and story. I saw JP2 because the book had good character development and story, and was disappointed in the movie. JP3 <i>does</i> look like total crap, and this is coming from a die-hard JP fan. I'll see it anyway, though. I'm sorry to say it just looks like another sell-out on the franchise. I mean, come on, they pulled the plot out of their anuses and butchered the series with JP2, and JP3's plot seems to be even weaker and more far-fetched.
I'll just pop in my JP DVD when I want a great dino movie.
At 12:43:17 PM on 7/8/2001, Gallimimus said:
Funny that in one of those reviews, they mention the Ceratosaurus/poop scene as being in the movie, although one of the earlier reviews said it was not in the fioonal version. Hmm....which one is fake?
At 12:35:01 PM on 7/8/2001, md23rewls said:
Critics are going to bash JP3 in some departments, like character development. That's natural. The reason I go to a movie like JP3 isn't for character. It's to see a fun summer movie. Because I don't really care if some critic doesn't like it, I'm gonna' see it anyway and judge it on its merits. Is it a fun, exciting adventure? P.S. I think the T-Rex should get his revenge, but it ain't gonna happen .
At 12:26:07 PM on 7/8/2001, Cheetah167 said:
<i>A.I.</i>'s ending didn't suck! It was an incredible ending. Let me tell you what I found out after I saw the film that made it twenty times better for me.
SPOILER! SCROLL TO SEE
Those things at the weren't aliens, they were mechas. They were robots! That is why they "downloaded" David's memory...they wanted to know how people were before the seas froze. It's that simple. Spielberg forshadowed when David was thin and tall in the elevator doors.
-Scott
At 12:15:45 PM on 7/8/2001, Stegasaurus said:
It'll be damn good. And Jurassic Theory, I'm sick of your crap so shut the hell up.
At 12:00:43 PM on 7/8/2001, angel_89 said:
I'm gettin scared, everyones saying the endings bad, I'm afraid it will be ruined like A.I., i liked it all the way till the end, then it sucked and it ruined the whole movie.I really hope it's good.
At 11:38:58 AM on 7/8/2001, Gus Hammond said:
Oh shut up. You don't know what you are talking about. Jurassic Park III deserves positive reviews. It already has positive reviews. You deserve to go to hell. 'Nuff said.
At 11:28:48 AM on 7/8/2001, Jurassic theory said:
The Haunting and Godzilla Deserve it and Jurassic Park 3 deserves it too.
At 10:27:59 AM on 7/8/2001, Gus Hammond said:
Critics disliked The Lost World and, if they don't like JP3 that's their problem. I HATED when films like "The Haunting", "Godzilla" and even "Saving Private Ryan" were harshed by most critics.
At 10:24:36 AM on 7/8/2001, Cheetah167 said:
21st
If most critics dislike the film, it hurts. We know critics like the other two, why not the popcorn movie JP3?
-Scott
At 10:21:13 AM on 7/8/2001, Gus Hammond said:
You will never hear a critic say that "JP3 is a masterpiece, it will win 12 Academy Awards, a triumph, a classic unforgettable film". You people care too much about what critics say. But think, there are many good reviews already. Isn't that good. For me, it is a good sign.
At 9:54:29 AM on 7/8/2001, Jurassic Fart said:
totally crap!?!?!?!?? I'm crying now
At 8:05:31 AM on 7/8/2001, metal.c said:
what the hell are u all going on about?
critics were bound to hate this movie just like you were bound to like it.
u like this movie before u even see it so maybe it is total crap
At 7:17:07 AM on 7/8/2001, Evilgrinch said:
I don't give a fuck what critics say.
Most of them say that the start and end of "Cast away" was crap. Personally, I thought that the best part of the film was the way that Hanks re-adapted to life once he'd left the island.
Cast away was one of my favourite films of last year, and Jp3 will be one of my favourite films of this year.
As I long as I like it, I don't give a fuck what others say.
At 6:10:25 AM on 7/8/2001, spino2000 said:
Well, as a preliminary, the attitude towards Ron Epstein on this message board was frankly absurd and uncivilized. This was a genuine review.
Now, in caps: I HOPE THEY KEPT THE REAL ENDING SECRET AND THAT IT WILL ONLY BE REVEALED NEXT WEEK!! this has happened before on some other prescreenings. It's very easy to have made to cuts and only one was revealed to the journalists and few lucky ones. I do hope so. I don't need necessarily the TREX to come back (btw: where is the other one?? or the other one in JP II was brought back to the other island???).
Anyway, I have a very small hope the real cut has not bee shown to press. Surprise us Mr Johnston. Shit, I already know the whole story.... grrrr ( and ditch the kid!! ah ah ! what is he? superkid ?)
At 5:49:15 AM on 7/8/2001, utero said:
Overall it's sounding good, most less positive reviews can't seem to get over the fact that the T-Rex isn't really in it. Thank god, they sold that idea to death in the second one.
At 5:40:53 AM on 7/8/2001, ParkerP82 said:
The problem with the reviews is that they are saying that every charcter gets a 10 minute-get-to-know-him moment,well JP had that too and the lost world not at all so what?!
Saying the Trex should come back,no way!!!!We've had enough(TOOMUCH)of him in the first two films.He had it coming!
Don't bother to read reviews....it makes you depressed for no reason at all.
At 4:44:56 AM on 7/8/2001, road-runner said:
I think JP3 is one good short movie. but it coeld have been longer. as usaly this kind of movies take 2 hours.
At 4:22:40 AM on 7/8/2001, road-runner said:
and JP had allso 3 stars of 5.
(in belgium).
At 4:21:36 AM on 7/8/2001, road-runner said:
3 stars is great! TLW had 2 stars of 5.
At 3:54:00 AM on 7/8/2001, Big Rex said:
Why do you guys always look to the bad review. There are good reviews at AICN along with the bad ones, and the one at BBC is a good one. Don't ever expect them to give it 5 stars, you guys must have looked too high. Just be glad that the majority of people have said they liked the film.
At 3:47:36 AM on 7/8/2001, no1important said:
I agree with Mighty T-rex.I'll watch what I wanna watch and decide how good it was.I dont need people telling me what they thought.Thats thier problem.Man I hate critics.
At 3:19:37 AM on 7/8/2001, Steve,i,saw,it said:
fUCKING CRIICS they need to think from our point of view.
At 3:12:05 AM on 7/8/2001, Danfield78 said:
if there's dinosaurs in it i'll love it.
Are there any dinosaurs in this movie?
At 2:57:58 AM on 7/8/2001, NoOnesWorthIt said:
Fuck the Critics. Granted they bashed "The Lost World,"
but Spielberg and his creative controll fuck that up.
This movie will fuckin rock
At 2:56:57 AM on 7/8/2001, ellersaur said:
My first credit as a news reporter. Wooo-hooo!
At 2:40:53 AM on 7/8/2001, SFNE GUY said:
hopefully the ending isnt as bad as they say.
At 2:38:51 AM on 7/8/2001, Mighty T-rex said:
3rd, oh isn't that so special! Erm, anyway, I don't give a crap about what reviewers say, I'll decide whether it's "totally crap" or "a fun summer popcorn movie" when I see it
p.s. I didn't bother to read the reviews.
At 2:30:37 AM on 7/8/2001, rrenna said:
2nd!
ahh.. i dont care.. look at the reviews for JP they said the same crap! I hate people who review movies and tell u not to see it... dumbasses... maby THEY didnt like it.. but thats them, chances are that if your at a JP3 fan site ur gonna luv the movie!
At 2:23:48 AM on 7/8/2001, utahraptor01 said:
1st
Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment
|
|
Add DJP3P to your newsreader!
|
