|
|
[ Log In ] [ Register ]
 means the user is online now!
That second review, yeah, that was gay.
Who the hell wants to see the Rex come back after it getting it's throat ripped out? Yeah, it could come back and fight, but it wouldn't be able to roar and in the middle of the scene it's head would fall off!
What a moron! The Rex starred in two movies, now it's time to let the Spino have its turn. Maybe for four there will be a new big bad boy, even badder than the rex or spino. That critic needs to die, and so do most of the rest of them!
Of course, these are just my personal views, and if you disagree with me, well, I could care less.
At 11:13:47 PM on 7/7/2001, angel_89 said:
I've been waiting 235 days for this movie to come out and I dont care what any critic says. I'm going to watch this movie as many times as i can!!!!
At 9:02:46 PM on 7/7/2001, SFNE GUY said:
smug you need a theripist or something WHY THE HELL WOULD YOU WANT TO SEE RAPTORS HAVING SEX???!!?!?!!?
At 10:06:37 AM on 7/7/2001, smugjp3 said:
GOD, I HOPE THERE IS A DINO SEX SCENE IN THIS ONE!!!!!
At 8:51:27 AM on 7/7/2001, Evilgrinch said:
Critics hate all summer blockbusters.
They don't know shit.
At 7:37:14 AM on 7/7/2001, sickofsociety said:
Spino's a carnivore wannabee
At 6:23:30 AM on 7/7/2001, Aqua_raptor said:
Well Oviraptor.... looks like you are wrong.. it is generally 90 mins (and it dosen't matter whether it is) - so up yours!!!!!!!!
At 4:44:59 AM on 7/7/2001, choad said:
honestly, i believe that the review is true, partially. So far, anyway, because i just cannot believe that the t-rex won't show up at the end and whoop the spino's ass, because...uh, that would suck. even if it doesn't happen like i want i'm still going to love the movie. but plz t-rex kill the spino, that bastard is trying to steal your spotlight
At 3:00:12 AM on 7/7/2001, Joey_Joe_Joe_Jr said:
Seriously peoples...calm...breath....breath....
Surely intelligent Jurrasic Park fans could not have their opinions swayed by that of a few reviews...
At 2:55:53 AM on 7/7/2001, ellersaur said:
And if this movie doesn't deliver, I will see to it that Joe Johnston never works in this town again!!! Do you hear me?!!! Ohhh yeahhh!!!! He is tearing this team APART!!!
(Sorry to get all Al Pacino-ish there. I felt it was necessary).
At 2:47:34 AM on 7/7/2001, ellersaur said:
I have spent four years waiting for this movie, and many hours in this site. If this movie is the worst in the series, I will have to start going to Rage-aholics.
At 2:42:22 AM on 7/7/2001, ellersaur said:
Two lines pop into mind:
JP - "Hold on to your butts."
TLW - "Hang on, this is going to be bad."
Despite all of my optimism, all of the cool scenes in the commercials, I can't help but feel a little nervous.
At 1:38:25 AM on 7/7/2001, iijoshyboyii said:
damnit! i am afraid to go see jp3 now....but hey ...all i read about scary movie 2 was bad reviews...and i laughed my ass off the whole movie...maybe all these people reviewing JP3 are just old farts who are tired with their profession and have to diss movies just to diss them! i think in all sinserity Jp3 will be a great movie for all jp fans! keep your heads up people...i think the ending actually sounds pretty cool....later
At 12:50:16 AM on 7/7/2001, Oviraptor said:
90 mins. of TLW is up to where Ian, Sarah, and kelly are walking thru the Dinosaur graveyard.
At 12:39:59 AM on 7/7/2001, CrouchingSpino said:
I'm scared guys. 90 minutes...well, if they would have taken the San Diego scene out of TLW, it would have been around 1 hour 45 minutes.
At 12:14:39 AM on 7/7/2001, Dr. Flee said:
One thing that piss me off is that if the review are bad less people will see the movie, and they'lll probably won't be a JP4! I think if they want to do the fourth one hey should do it in a way that JP, TLW AND JP3 DIDN'T HAPPEN, A ALL NEW MOVIE NOT A SEQUEL OR PREQUEL...
At 11:58:19 PM on 7/6/2001, Mighty T-rex said:
OH, MY VIRGIN EARS!!! Ectocooler, how could you? How could you?????? JP3 a crappy film? NEVER!!! NEVER IN ALL OF TIME WILL JP3 BE CCCRRRAAAPPPYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
At 11:03:59 PM on 7/6/2001, Stegasaurus said:
I'm sorry oviraptor, I was just possesed by satan 20 minutes ago. No hard feelings.
At 10:44:02 PM on 7/6/2001, Stegasaurus said:
You're a funny guy!
At 10:38:03 PM on 7/6/2001, Oviraptor said:
No thanks...
At 10:28:30 PM on 7/6/2001, Stegasaurus said:
Suck my fucking dick ovir fucking raptor!!!!
At 10:23:43 PM on 7/6/2001, Oviraptor said:
FUCK YOU, JACKASS!
At 10:22:04 PM on 7/6/2001, ectocooler said:
im simply amaized at the bunch of crying babies in here.
were all so wrapped up in jp3, we never stopped to think that maybe...it could be a crappy film...
At 10:15:09 PM on 7/6/2001, Oviraptor said:
IT'S NOT 90 FUCKING MINS! *GEEZ*
At 10:14:49 PM on 7/6/2001, Stegasaurus said:
The time doesn't friggi'n matter! JP3 will still be good!
At 10:14:05 PM on 7/6/2001, Snap-jaw said:
I hate those annoying critics.It's another Jurassic Park movie gave it poor reviews. I like JP and TLW there Classic and (Steven Speilberg) masterpieces. Another thing got wait until next Jurassic Park movie.
At 10:10:24 PM on 7/6/2001, Aqua_raptor said:
wanna bet, i bet it it 90 mins long
At 9:57:05 PM on 7/6/2001, Oviraptor said:
It's not 90 mins. long, Joe has already confirmed that it's longer.
At 9:47:51 PM on 7/6/2001, Powerhouse said:
why only 90 mins WHY~!~!~!
At 9:27:58 PM on 7/6/2001, Oviraptor said:
The mystery characters are Billy Brennan and Mark Degler.
At 9:05:15 PM on 7/6/2001, g0d said:
ud think that if these were real they may mention that "surprise" mystery person that is suppose to show up god dammit.
At 8:57:38 PM on 7/6/2001, spino2000 said:
smells like weird ending because of:
poor editing
poor script
no more cash
edited by another director, as for TOmb Raider, which still disappoints btw.
Make your choices guys! I'm pretty ready to trash the movie if our expections are not met...
At 8:54:54 PM on 7/6/2001, Oviraptor said:
There's made for TV movies longer than 90 mins. that's just ridiculous that JP3 would be only 90 mins.
At 8:45:51 PM on 7/6/2001, BWGator said:
Someone tell me where these people are seeing the movie at? What big positions do they hold to be able to view it before the premiers?
At 8:44:50 PM on 7/6/2001, Aqua_raptor said:
Okay, can I just point out that like 6 reviews have all said it is 90 mins long.... sorry guys but now I'm betting that it is only an hour and a half!
At 8:38:22 PM on 7/6/2001, Aqua_raptor said:
Dan needs to contact Joe, and ask if the rumours about the fact Jp3 is 90 mins. These should put put to rest, or prooved. It's simple... Ask the Director himself.
At 8:34:18 PM on 7/6/2001, Oviraptor said:
Joe Johnston said it's longer than 90 mins!!!
At 8:31:54 PM on 7/6/2001, SeTH said:
While the movie will surely kick ass i am worried about the ending. If the endind is what they say it is at corona then i will be dissapointed.The ending is one of the most important parts of the movie because thats the last thing you see and if it sucked it damn near ruins the whole experience. I must admit that i am going to see the movie numerous times...i mean come on its Jurassic Park for god sakes.On a final note i will say that i am trying not to get to worked up becuase i have yet to agree with a critic on a movie that i have seen. I myself don't understand this consept of "critics". A critic does nothing more than give his/her opinon on a movie,and lets be honest,if everyone went by what a dumbass said we wouldn't see too many movies!
At 8:30:11 PM on 7/6/2001, HammondEggs said:
SPOLIERS AHEAD
I hate to shatter some hopes here, but my review was real and heartfelt.
I posted the review to Corona's Coming Attractions. The screening I saw took place Thursday morning, attended by a dozen or so industry types (there was a guy from Disney, one from Dreamworks, and the lady who ran it was from Universal). THe film was shown to bolster promotions for theatres.
I saw this film. I am not making anything up. It was only ninety minutes, and it felt cut up, as if at the last minute, someone (Spielberg) got cold feet about the intensity.
You want proof? I don't know how to prove it. Read the end of the post, I guess.
I liked the movie, though. I'm sad that people are calling my review negative. I loved the original film and I pretty well liked the first sequel. I am a regular joe, a geek, a guy who was unable to sleep the night before seeing the screening. I don't want anyone to be disappointed by this film's ending. And I wish someone would read my review and put the final battle back.
That's all.
So, the proof. Read the following (which contains a small spoiler) for a taste of what's in the movie...
*
*
*
*
Eric Kirby rescues Grant from the raptors (the scene where they surrond him) by using gas grenades. He brings Grant into the trailer of an empty water truck, where he has taken refuge for eight weeks. The two of them talk some, Eric saying he read both of Grant's books, though he likes the first one better, before Grant hated dinos. Grant comments that it was written before any of them tried to EAT him. Grant asks if Eric read Malcolm's book, and Eric says yeah, but Malcolm seems "high on himself." Grant agrees.
At 8:19:18 PM on 7/6/2001, spino2000 said:
besides: 90minutes till the end of the end credits! well, that leave about 85-86minutes for the movie or so?
I say, even with a tight fast pace, a movie like that should 100-105minutes of real screentime. quantity ain't quality but minimal quantity, or normla quantity, should be a sort of rule. especially since people are getting used to 2hrs+ movies.
At 8:14:54 PM on 7/6/2001, spino2000 said:
INCREDIBLE! and worrysome I should say: seems those who had not particular feeling about the sequel will get pleased while die hard fans or people with high expections will be disappointed! there's always some truths to rumours or impressions: I'm starting to worry this won't be such a great film. argh!! the beauty and danger of the internet for a movie!!
At 8:09:24 PM on 7/6/2001, david.c said:
To Mr Goodbytes, um, that's plain wrong. Just becasue raptors have a major role in trailers doesn't mean they're in the film much! Look at the Rock and The Mummy Returns. I thought Raptors were always under-used in JP films. Anyway, if it IS completely finished, it probably is 92 minutes, simply because Joe might have wanted to overhype it by saying it was definitely longer. That's two possible misleading things about JP3 then... I'll probably love it. So far the only great films I've seen this year are Shrek and Bridget Jones.
At 8:00:14 PM on 7/6/2001, Mighty T-rex said:
Not to mention he said that the T-rex/Spinosaurus fight is much too short, when we all know it's around 5 mins. long, which is very long for a dinosaur fight.
At 7:58:15 PM on 7/6/2001, Mighty T-rex said:
Ratpor T: JP3 WILL BE WAY BETTER THAN A.I.!!!
At 7:55:55 PM on 7/6/2001, Mighty T-rex said:
Bah, J.J. himself said it was over 90 mins., in fact, didn't he say "over 95"? I thought that 95 mins. was the very first rumor of the length of JP3, and J.J. nixed it, saying he was sure it was over 95 mins. Correct me if I'm wrong.
At 7:45:09 PM on 7/6/2001, Raptor-T said:
READ THIS:
These reviews have to be fake and JP3 is not 90 minutes.
The reasons:
- Joe Johnston said it was definitely longer than 90 mins. He was honest with all of us since the beginning.
- Producer Kathleen Kennedy says they shot 140 minutes worth of footage.
- William H. Macy says that the action on the island clocks in at about 90 minutes (did you forget about the opening; the lecture with Dr. Grant at the college; Laura Dern's cameo; the dinner with Neill, Macy, Leoni, and Nivora; Grant's dream sequence (which Johnston says he fought to keep it in and it is - No one mentioned that!), etc.) We looking at possibility 130 minutes at the most.
- Erin Brockovich's script was 119 pages. JP3 is 111 pages. Erin Brockovich had almost an hour worth of deleted scenes and the movie still clocked in at 132 minutes!
- Plus, where's the proof that these "so-called" reviewers were even at the press screening. They have made-up JP names like us all, where as an actual reviewer wouldn't use such a name.
- Evilgrinch.
- The reviews are describing action we have seen in the previews.
- The Press Screening says they applauded extenively.
- Fake reviews were out before the release of Star Wars: Episode 1 - The Phantom Menace.
- Can go on and on with how these reviews aren't real, just more pranks trying to ruin our awe of the best summer blockbuster of the year since A.I.
At 7:45:09 PM on 7/6/2001, RaptorHiss said:
If you have the commercials go watch them and then tell me JP3 will be bad.I can't wait to see it and will not spoil the fun hinking it is bad
At 7:38:36 PM on 7/6/2001, jappar2001 said:
I thought the critics would of mentioned the dream sequence. anyway i'm going to relive the excitement of the trailer. bye
At 7:35:08 PM on 7/6/2001, Mike007 said:
You know I just noticed something about these reviews. Many of them have the same things like the short running timeof JP3. But did you notice that each and everytime that Dan posts thse reviews, they all they went to see a 'test screening'. Doesn't make ssense that they're testing the movie? I'm not sure about you'll, but Idon't believe the 'short running time'.
At 7:25:48 PM on 7/6/2001, Oviraptor said:
Yeah Joe, exspecially about the length of the film, it's surely not 90 mins. is it Joe?
At 7:23:09 PM on 7/6/2001, jappar2001 said:
i've gone all anti jp3.
At 7:19:23 PM on 7/6/2001, jappar2001 said:
Johnston where are you we need to know tidy a few thing up.
At 7:17:45 PM on 7/6/2001, Oviraptor said:
Get over it T-Rex lover, the Rex isn't immortal.
At 7:16:22 PM on 7/6/2001, GM Ribo said:
I'm just praying that these reviews are fake....because I cannot think that i have wasted over a year every single day watching this film go from pre to post-production and it turns out to be a terrible movie with not so good action and only clocks in at 90mins. If this is true I swear I'm going to shoot myself then shoot someone else. *stares at a random person and points* Like you!!!
At 7:15:48 PM on 7/6/2001, jappar2001 said:
f**K critics. There job is to criticise, how sad and depressing. All reviews sound negative because thats what there about analiizing the bad point of a movie. Have tou ever noticed somtimes when reading a review that it doesn't reflect the mak out of 5 or 10 in the slightest and then sddenly you have a totally different outlook on the movie.
At 7:15:38 PM on 7/6/2001, cyberdino said:
Hey guys, there's another review at www.corona.bc.ca/films/main.html, check it out! This person has viewed the absolute finished product and says alot of details we've never heard before, it is somewhat of a mixed review and has alot of spoilers so be careful!
At 6:44:57 PM on 7/6/2001, RaptorHiss said:
I think we need more self confidence, these reviewers are only trying to make us think it will be a bad movie.I remember when I first saw the promo picture in the March issue of Current Science.I thought, this movie is going to rock.Then I learned that Steven wasn't doing that.Then I thought it was going to bad.Next we see the surviver trailer.WOW, then I knew this movie was going to rock.What I trying to say is that do not think that if the reviewers say its bad it's going to be bad.Think what you always thought.
At 6:42:41 PM on 7/6/2001, Anthony said:
I really hope it's more than 92 minutes!!!!!!!!
I like long movies.
Dan: Can you ask Joe Johnson about the run time again? Please.
At 6:41:42 PM on 7/6/2001, gwsim said:
Lorcan is an idiot
At 6:41:26 PM on 7/6/2001, Oviraptor said:
I think they're all FAKE reviews!
At 6:40:37 PM on 7/6/2001, Oviraptor said:
92 mins.? 90 mins, ? what the hell is it?
At 6:27:44 PM on 7/6/2001, Dr. Ian Malcom said:
and pigs can fly
At 6:11:40 PM on 7/6/2001, Jurassiclaw said:
hum, yeah...I just have the feeling it'll be good...but I don't know why. Myabe because I was impressed to see how the third movie CAN beat the original (Die Hard 3, for example)_
At 5:50:35 PM on 7/6/2001, CrouchingSpino said:
I'm saying I personally loved Pearl Harbor. I'm saying just because everyone hates Pearl Harbor doesn't mean I have to.
At 5:36:01 PM on 7/6/2001, tyranosaurus-R said:
pearl harbor would have been alot better if they condensed all the scenes before the bombing to about 15 minutes the got rid of the love triangle.
At 5:29:02 PM on 7/6/2001, RaptorRampage said:
You know what I say...to hell with the reviewers. They base the movie on their opinion, and they are never open-minded. For all we know they are probably Disney people...JP3 is going to be great...I just have a feeling. They have learned from their mistakes in TLW, and they have improved on all aspects of JP, I say we...the Jurassic Park fans...rate and detirmine how good/bad the movie is...and let those movie-people go make themselves look bad!
At 4:54:09 PM on 7/6/2001, Marbell said:
As Chef on South Park once said (with a little of my improvising) "Oooh, those reviewers can suck on my chocolate salty balls, putem in your mouth, putem in your mouth and suckem and suckem!"
At 4:52:16 PM on 7/6/2001, Cheetah167 said:
In all actuality, <i>Pearl Harbor</i> was fodder that should be fed to the pigs. Here are my reasons:
1. Poorly acted.
2. Predictable.
3. Poorly written.
4. Over-done cinematography.
5. Manipulative plot.
6. Virtually a teen movie.
7. Insulted veterans.
8. Innaccurate.
9. Over-budget.
10. A bore.
11. Too funny.
Those are reasons.
-Scott
At 4:45:06 PM on 7/6/2001, raptor13 said:
it took them a long time to film the movie...don't you thik it would be longer?
At 4:42:25 PM on 7/6/2001, CrouchingSpino said:
Ok guys. All I've seen and heard for the past 2 months is stuff like 'Pearl Harbor sucks and A.I. sucks' while both of those were excellent films. Of course, there is going to be people that HATE JP3 for no more than a reason to just diss the thing. People LOVE to diss long awaited films. Critics HATED TLW....I loved TLW. There were even mixed reviews of the original...and for Christ sake, HOW can you POSSIBLY find ANYTHING wrong with the original? THERE IS NOTHING WRONG!!! So, through the midst of these reviews, don't think for a second that JP3 will be a bad film, because it won't. It won't. It can't really, unless the rest of the film that the commercials don't show is absolute dog crap. We have seen that clip on Leno that was awesome. We have seen the stuff on ET, we have seen how awesome the CGI i, we've heard ho great the music is...we've seen how good the acting is (especially when Eric screams when he sees the walking ptera...the only thing that could hurt the movie is the ending, which I agree, after reading the end of that storybook, isn't that good. But at least the Spino doesn't get loose on the mainland. There is NO way JP3 will suck...sure it has a chance of being mediocre, but as far as being a bad film, no way. Not from what we've seen. So don't worry about it. By the way...didn't Johnston say the movie wasn't completely finished, PLUS everyone at the test screenings 'applauded extensively' plus...ah, just plus a bunch of crap. Geez. Two things can hurt the film: a 90 minute run time, and the ending. Now, we KNOW the movie is over 90 minutes...Johnston said it was...but culd it be 91 minutes? 92 minutes? We're not sure. Second...the ending...like I said, it cannot be worse than TLW's. So why worry about JP3? It will rock.
At 4:06:23 PM on 7/6/2001, joost said:
DAMN, WHY DO I HAVE TO WAIT TIL AUGUST 2ND TO WATCH JP3, WHY! WHY!, IT SUCKS!
At 4:02:38 PM on 7/6/2001, Trillian said:
i don't get this. so the 'its hard not to feel a little offended' or whatever line is is got cut? did like half the movie get thrown in the bin all the sudden. 90 minutes makes me sad. the new commercial will cheer me up though.
At 4:02:13 PM on 7/6/2001, RaptorDave said:
Hey I just joined here but Ive been following the movie since May. With that said , I would just like to say without hanging my head that I liked the Lost World. I also think that some reviewers like the Dark Horizon one go into a movie and expect not to like it so they can not like it no matter what is on the screen.
At 4:01:39 PM on 7/6/2001, joost said:
maybe a spoiler warning would be nice
At 3:45:23 PM on 7/6/2001, Mr Goodbytes said:
The review at the bottom is fake. He or she says that the raptors are not in much of the film, and they don't talk much about their intelligence. THAT IS NOTHING BUT BS!!!!!!!!! You can tell just from the trailers that they have a large role and that they are intelligent. Just look at trailer #9 and #7!!!!!! I get so SICK of WORTHLESS JP bashers giving FALSE REVIEWS!!!!!! They don't even know what the heck they are talking about for the most part!!!! IT REALLY MAKES ME MAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
At 3:26:56 PM on 7/6/2001, Cheetah167 said:
These are legitimate reviews, not legitimate reviewers. Are these guys Time, Newsweek, Entertainment Weekly, Chicago-Sun Times, or Rolling Stone? No! No need to be upset people.
At 3:19:56 PM on 7/6/2001, Horribly_Mauled said:
The Dark Horizons review seems fake to me... its a press screening for gawds sake! WHo is the damned reviewer anyway?
The one posted here however strikes me as legit, but the things that are raised seem to be nitpicking...
still, only one way to find out about a film, and thats to see it...
At 3:15:58 PM on 7/6/2001, Raptor X said:
Ok, I think these reviews are a load of crap, am I the only person who likes The Lost World? I don't see anything wrong with it, I mean I liked how they sparked the film up with the T-Rex being in a city instead of a jungle.
As for the film being 90 minutes long, look the only reason JP 1 & 2 were so long, was because of the timing of just talking. Look at JP3, this film is going to be NON-stop action, so we are saying 90 minutes of non-stop awesome dinosaur effects, when JP 1 & 2 had not that all much if you think about it.
So what I am saying is that Jurassic Park 3 is going to rule! So SCREW THE CRITICS! It is what we think!
-Raptor X
At 3:14:36 PM on 7/6/2001, raptor13 said:
Fake as hell...when they say thy won' go into any detail that means they don't know aything...therefoe they idn't see it!
At 3:14:28 PM on 7/6/2001, Cheetah167 said:
Ha! This reviewer is sick! Look what he said! He wants more people to be killed, that sadistic bastard! Haha! Another thing, this is one review, there will be about 100 legitimate others that could be good.
It is pointless to bicker over the quandries of one man and his review...anyway, the guy was just into the movie for the effects, not in the movie for the movie. I believe it'll be good.
I mean, how many other action films have no lulls whatsoever? Here are some popular titles.
"The Matrix" - have several lulls
"Alien" - some scenes were just a bore
"Independence Day" - I could name a few
"Air Force One" - barely any
"The Lost World: Jurassic Park" - yes, they were there
Give the man a break, we is just a reviewer and he has a right to his opinion. You too, Theory (what is your name?). We are fans of the flick, of course we will like it.
Those are my two cents.
-Scott
At 2:49:45 PM on 7/6/2001, Gus Hammond said:
I liked The Lost World too. It's a very good action film. It's just too dark for me though.
At 2:49:29 PM on 7/6/2001, Steve,i,saw,it said:
i don't mind the film being short. imagine jurrasic park or lost world with only action seans in it thats probably what jp3 will be like.
At 2:46:48 PM on 7/6/2001, Steve,i,saw,it said:
i wonder if johnson is listening to our comments right now. he may do last touches to the film acording to what reviers and we say.
At 2:41:16 PM on 7/6/2001, Gus Hammond said:
Critics usually don't say that films like JPIII or The Lost World are masterpieces. I'll watch the movie and the most important review will be my own's. (For me, of course!)
At 2:41:02 PM on 7/6/2001, Steve,i,saw,it said:
i can tell this film is going to have all good things from both movies with no nonsince in between.
At 2:40:09 PM on 7/6/2001, HMT2 said:
Regarding the review at Home Theater Forum, I really have my doubts. Too many factual errors between what he says and the script. Another example: referring to the Kirby's as a 'wealthy couple'. In the script, there is an entire scene devoted to that deception and how they actually gave Grant a bogus check to get him to come to the island. They are not wealthy. This along with other factual errors really has me wondering.
Bob
HMT
At 2:38:35 PM on 7/6/2001, Steve,i,saw,it said:
don't listen to reviewers. they talk c~*p. they hated tombraider, i liked, they hated lost world, i liked. there all a bunch of old farts. there all old people who rate merry popins 5 stars*****.
At 2:34:03 PM on 7/6/2001, pj said:
Dan, just please ask Joe Johnston why all the reviews say 90 minutes. and why the poop, macy scene was missing from there? please!
At 2:22:49 PM on 7/6/2001, raptor0o7 said:
Stupid Reviewers...do they really have to nit-pick at every last thing!? Gheesh!
At 2:18:50 PM on 7/6/2001, BWGator said:
How is it that some people are being able to view the movie even before the L.A. and N.Y. showings? Are we sure that these reviews are even valid?
At 2:17:32 PM on 7/6/2001, SuperJonk said:
*strangles nearest person*
Why am I the only person who loves the Lost World????!!!!
And why didn't the Wayans brotheres have to go off hte air, it could ahve at least had a last show!!!!!
Oops...
At 2:12:25 PM on 7/6/2001, utero said:
I'm glad it's only 90 minutes. It'll be a tight rollercoaster ride ratehr then being boring. I'm more concerned with the fact that the potential classic 'offended' line is said to be missing.
I'm seeing it in the UK in the 17th so I'll reserve judgement until then.
At 2:08:21 PM on 7/6/2001, Dinosaur_neill said:
I won't mind as long as jp3 is better than tlw...oh please god let it be better! Why are all the latest dinosaur movies not as good as jp? Why!!!?
At 1:56:22 PM on 7/6/2001, JP_Rocks said:
Damn, only 92 mins, I thought Johnston said it was longer than 90mins a few weeks back. Only 2 mins over 90 isn't that great, I was hoping for at least an hour and 50 mins to go up against Spielberg's babies of 2 hrs 5 mins and 2 hrs 7 mins. I know this movie is still going to kick some ass, but only 92 mins!! DAMN!!
At 1:44:58 PM on 7/6/2001, EVA01 said:
Who cares what they say. You see the movie and judge for yourself, don't let them do it for you.
At 1:39:35 PM on 7/6/2001, Cuckoo said:
I remember reading a wide array of reviews for the first two JP movies. I also remember critics universally panning some movies that might have been bad, but still made a killing at the box office. Hell, Lost World broke box office records, and it wasn't as good as the first one...if JP3 is better than the Lost World, then I would consider it a success. I'll reserve judgment until I see the film for myself.
P.S. Terminator 2 was a joke compared to the original....
At 1:37:02 PM on 7/6/2001, Cheetah167 said:
Dan,
I put it under mixed because there were <i>some</i> good remarks about it. Bad, to me is: "Don't waste your time with this plithy filth."
That is one review! No need to worry folks, though if it gets bad reviews less people will see it. This is a fan-based movie.
JP3 WILL BE <B>THE</B> MOVIE!
-Scott
At 1:34:02 PM on 7/6/2001, Paradox said:
fuck those dumbasses... dont let those idiots fool ya
At 1:33:45 PM on 7/6/2001, Stegasaurus said:
Anthony kicks ass!
At 1:31:27 PM on 7/6/2001, Anthony said:
Okay, I'm going to be frank. I have been very, very excited about this movie for like five months now. I have been a gigantic fan of JP since '93.
When I first heard of JP3, and that Crichton, Williams, and Speilberg weren't going to be intensly involved, I though right then - and I remember this - that it definetly was NOT going to be critically acclaimed.
Now as I learned more - Johnson, Niel, Spinosaurus - I slowly began to realize: "This movie is going to kick ass!"
Yet, I still do not expect it to be as praised as at least the first one.
I am still very excited, I AM going to see it on July 18th. I will buy it on DVD. And I am sure as HELL going to enjoy it!
And I think that I am not alone.
At 1:28:47 PM on 7/6/2001, Stegasaurus said:
I agree with Jpraptor16.
At 1:23:49 PM on 7/6/2001, Stegasaurus said:
This is bullshit. I've waited the whole friggi'n summer for this movie and I hear this? Fuck them. I'm gonna like the movie and all critics can go to hell!
At 1:23:32 PM on 7/6/2001, mezzer said:
i meant it makes the film sound bad
At 1:22:58 PM on 7/6/2001, ParkerP82 said:
Dan stop doing that If someone wants to read a review they'll go to that specific site stop posting reviews on your webpage,you're losing people.........
At 1:22:47 PM on 7/6/2001, AllenGrant said:
it is very easy to see that these two reviews are fake.
ha ha just kidding :)
At 1:22:44 PM on 7/6/2001, mezzer said:
im fed up of these stupid reviews im fed up of them they make the film dead bad
At 1:22:13 PM on 7/6/2001, giganotospinotaurus said:
All I'm gonna say is, "Oh, no."
At 1:17:05 PM on 7/6/2001, Anthony said:
Hell that Jurassic Theory bastard could've written it!
At 1:16:12 PM on 7/6/2001, JPraptor16 said:
In regards to what NY91Yankee said, I think T2 was better than Terminator.
At 1:16:11 PM on 7/6/2001, Anthony said:
That's true, but it was also ultra concise, and and best was made of vague details. There's nothing in that review we havn't heard before. I could've easily written that review!
Not that I doubt completely that he saw it, I just think a ten-year-old could have done a better job by just seeing the commercials and hearing a few internet rumors.
At 1:12:06 PM on 7/6/2001, Dan said:
The review at the bottom of this review is pretty negative, I'd think..
-Dan
At 1:12:02 PM on 7/6/2001, Cheetah167 said:
lol
At 1:11:46 PM on 7/6/2001, JPraptor16 said:
Screw thes reviews, JP3 will rock, and the only thing that matters it what we think about it. Don't be influenced by bad reviews!
At 1:10:23 PM on 7/6/2001, Anthony said:
Shutup NY91Yankee.
At 1:05:39 PM on 7/6/2001, NY91Yankee said:
WoW Cheetah167 , u did that all by yourself! I'm impressed.
At 1:03:08 PM on 7/6/2001, Cheetah167 said:
the score so far is:
Good reviews: 1
Mixed reviews: 1
Bad reviews: 0
-Scott
At 1:02:44 PM on 7/6/2001, NY91Yankee said:
Avimimus, The first isn't always the best. The Godfather II, Empire Strikes Back, and Terminator 2 are prime examples.
At 1:02:24 PM on 7/6/2001, NY91Yankee said:
Avimimus, The first isn't always the best. The Godfather II, Empire Strikes Back, and Terminator 2 are prime examples.
At 1:01:56 PM on 7/6/2001, Harding On said:
From what I understand...the test screening was still and unfinished version and post production is still working on the film. I still think that it'll be fun. But I guess all the questions about the t-rex and spino fight are answered and the T-Rex won't return at the end!!
At 1:01:12 PM on 7/6/2001, ParkerP82 said:
For god sakes don't post every freakin review that gets made,I think the movie will be better than JP and even if it is shorter I don't care,look at Scream that was the shortest out of the series and it rocked.The new tvspot is the best yet,wow!
At 12:43:07 PM on 7/6/2001, JP Animal Control said:
A short movie. Darn it. Oh well, I will still like it. Only 12 more days!!!!
At 12:40:26 PM on 7/6/2001, Avimimus said:
Of sourse it isn't as good as the first. The first will always be the best, cuz it's a classic and has the best plot.
Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment
|
|
Add DJP3P to your newsreader!
|
