|
|
[ Log In ] [ Register ]
 means the user is online now!
they NEVER used TLW logo in the film. They still used the old Jurassic Park one - and i very much doubt that the JP3 logo will feature in the film - i mean, how could it?
At 3:16:48 AM on 6/25/2000, Utahraptor said:
Well, thta doesn't make it a TLW prequel, unless said specifically. But yes, the lot doe sound like a TLW prequel,a s I mentioned. BUt maybe we're reading too much into it.
At 10:37:50 PM on 6/24/2000, Embryo said:
Well it *IS* a prequel to the Lost World. That is 100% confirmed.
1) Johnston said that the movie would *not* be a prequel to the *first* movie.
2) The set at Site B is being cleaned out slghtly so it doesn't look as old.
3) Probably for the Site C.
At 7:48:35 PM on 6/24/2000, jonney claw said:
I have a question about the logo: If they have changed the logo then will the logo also be changed in the movie? Because in the other two movies they used the same logo of the Rex and i can understand why the logo was differnt in TLW because it was supposed to be o;d and ruined. But i can't possibly think of how such a drastic change could occur for JP3
At 5:09:05 AM on 6/24/2000, Why said:
That the stage is rebuilt, is probably beacuse it's a prequel?
At 11:10:35 PM on 6/23/2000, Embryo said:
WWW.JURASSIC PARK.COM!!!!!!!!!!!!! I KNOW IT ISN'T RELATED BUT THE SITE OPENED!!!!!!!!! YOU CAN'T ACCESS IT BUT IT HAS A COOL SPLASH IMAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
At 10:54:12 PM on 6/23/2000, Embryo said:
1) If the set is being re-furbished, then this movie is a prequel of sorts.
2) They obviously don't want any plot leaks because of such high security.
3) When will IngenNet be up again? Hehe.
4) I watched the movie again, and compared it to the VC pics at IngenNet. Have you noticed how so much was removed. All the trees, skeletons, grass on the ground, even a lot of the set was taken away. Couldn't it have been left the way it should've?
Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment
|
|
Add DJP3P to your newsreader!
|
