|
|
[ Log In ] [ Register ]
 means the user is online now!
I like thongs!!!
-Mr. O
At 6:31:59 PM on 6/10/2001, raptor88 said:
It is a spinosaures you idiots!
At 11:41:14 AM on 7/19/2000, graboid said:
it is sucho
At 1:12:42 PM on 6/29/2000, Arte Xanadu said:
I thought at first that the dinosaur was definitely a Baryonx. Now that I have seen a picture of a Suchomimus, and heard descriptions of it, I think the dinosaur is a Suchomimus. The noteable difference between the Bary and Sucho is that I have clearly seen a small "fin" going down the Sucho's back (like in the logo). Therefore, I say without a doubt that the dinosaur is a Sucho.
At 2:52:20 AM on 6/19/2000, sucho1 said:
does any1 know where i can download the original trailer for the lost world that apeared during the super bowl. Where they show they t-rex is in the rain?
At 1:13:53 AM on 6/19/2000, sucho1 said:
owen, you say they should have a trex, but people don't want same same same, so they wanted to have somethin different, like a suchomimus, which is as large as a trex and has more muscular arms
At 1:10:07 AM on 6/19/2000, sucho1 said:
does a damn mega rapter have a sail thing on its back, does it have a foot long thumb claw, no, it has a foot claw though
At 9:24:41 PM on 6/18/2000, TV Brains213 said:
No it's a mega raptor stupid. Its obvious.
At 2:41:21 AM on 6/17/2000, sucho1 said:
oh, and why the hell would they put a damn suchomimus on the logo, the main dino should be a carcarodontosaurus because it could waste any dino. The god damn suchomimus only ate some fish, mabey if the movie was about fish bieng attacked it would make sense. Even though the specimin found was 36 feet long and 12 feet tall that was NOT an adult
At 2:37:35 AM on 6/17/2000, sucho1 said:
ok. the damn dinosaur in the logo is a suchomimus. I studied it and suchomimus had a long slender and narrow skull, like the logo, it had a foot long thumb claw like the logo, and it had a sail like fin just like the logo. and how do you insert pictures here?
At 9:29:16 PM on 6/16/2000, TV Brains213 said:
Owen:
Youre wrong. It is owned by Spielberg and manufactured by him. I should know. It is also sponsored by K-Mart. Everyone knows that. FX!!
Ciaow, no, Chow, no, Ciao, no,I dont know
At 8:14:47 PM on 6/16/2000, Owen said:
But remember, that Dreamworks site is NOT official ! It has no connection to Spielberg, Universal or Dreamworks whatsoever. It is just a fansite. So it IS possible for them to get false info.
At 8:14:33 PM on 6/16/2000, Owen said:
But remember, that Dreamworks site id NOT official ! It has no connection to Spielberg, Universal or Dreamworks whatsoever. It is just a fansite. So it IS possible for them to get false info.
At 5:04:43 PM on 6/16/2000, Tango said:
Alright guys, I know I already posted this in the comments section under the "Jurassic Water" news, but guys come on. Why in the world would the toy line have a seperate JP3 logo? That doesn't make any sense. And second of all, why would we get a toy logo first over the movie logo, and why would the toy logo show up on the Dreamworks site without them telling us that it was the toy logo? Don't overthink such simple things guys. The toys will not have a seperate logo from the movie.
At 3:09:57 PM on 6/16/2000, sPitter said:
Oh, I don't know. Loox more like your mothers 2 me;) Hey guys. Long time no post.
WWWHHHAAADDDSSSAAAAAAAAHHHPPP?
Now what I'm thinking is if Sucho and Barry R both fish eaters, than Y R they're possible images occupying the main predator's logo? 2 B honest, I think Ceratosaurus was a waaaay sweeter predator than Sucho, Bary, Carno, rex OR raptor. It makes me wish those fake storyboards were real. *sigh*
Hey, is it just me, or does that Fossil Fuel Logo bear resemblence 2 this one?
At 3:00:02 PM on 6/16/2000, jonney claw said:
I think that the new logo is fairly cool, but deep down I don't think they would boot out the good ol' T-rex. I think this logo is a teaser logo, because the plot and info was all well know for the TLW before people saw it so I think they're going to keep the plot of JP3 a secret for a very long time.
At 2:54:57 PM on 6/16/2000, Siege_6 said:
OK, Tvbrains13. I'll forget and forgive for right now. But I'm not going to trust you completely.
At 1:54:55 PM on 6/16/2000, Carnotaur45 said:
Oh cool. I want that game, and the first one. I'm guessing that you're referring to the "pet the rhino picture?
At 6:54:58 AM on 6/16/2000, Katsura said:
Hi Carnotaur45,
Sorry I meant Dino Crisis 2 will have Carnotaurs. Or a very close relative.
It's got the distictive horn extrutions above the eyes, but the body seem a bit small...
Anyways, for movies and pics, try
http://www.dailyradar.com/previews/game_preview_738.html
At 5:38:58 AM on 6/16/2000, Owen said:
I hate to say this, guys. But I HATE the JP3 logo. However, I would have liked it if it had featured the T-Rex skeleton that we all know and love. This new dino just doesn't sit right. It just looks so...wrong. Hopefully this logo is just one Hasbro invented for their toyline. I honestly can't understand why they would change the well-known Rex image for this rather ugly looking thing.
At 8:26:36 PM on 6/15/2000, TV Brains213 said:
God I am so sorry,
My brother gets on here and like tries to anoy me and stuff. I have got some little brother cheeks to make rosie.
Pardon His French
Sincerely,
John Aikman Williams III Junior Esquire
At 8:00:38 PM on 6/15/2000, Carnotaur45 said:
D'OH! I meant to say Chriton said it wouldn't be a PREQUIL! Not sequil! Yes Dan, do something about him! please!
At 6:21:33 PM on 6/15/2000, Siege_6 said:
And what was that e-mail about? I didn't open it. I'm not that stupid.
At 6:19:41 PM on 6/15/2000, Siege_6 said:
OK, lowly is a word. No. I don't have a hamster, and oh yeah, your not mature. Ask anyone else here. Please Dan, do something about him.
At 6:10:28 PM on 6/15/2000, TV Brains213 said:
Siege6:
Go Wank Off Your Sister. I am mature. Lowly isnt a word. BUFALLO. I am in love with your hamster
At 5:55:33 PM on 6/15/2000, Tango said:
I believe Crichton said that it wouldn't be a sequel to Jurassic Park, but a sequel to The Lost World. It was announced by them (Crichton, Spielberg, Johnston) awhile back.
At 5:34:01 PM on 6/15/2000, Carnotaur45 said:
But it's been said by Chriton(sp?) himself it isn't a sequil, so...yeah. I had to get off the net last night, I wanted to keep talking, but i couldn't. Anyway, I found a rather cool point to be made about the cloning dinosaurs from amber thing: They could clone a dinosaur that's fossilized remains haven't been found yet. so this dino could just be a variation of a Sucho or Barynox (I will never be able to spell it!)
On another note, Dino Crisis has Carnotaurs!? Have any screen shots? Please?
At 5:12:43 PM on 6/15/2000, Tango said:
It isn't a prequel. Spielberg, Crichton, and Johnston have already stated that. I do admit that the spine in the logo starts a little early, like Spinosaurus, but I still think its Suchomimus because of the skull. But either way I will be extremely happy. I CANNOT WAIT FOR THIS MOVIE!!!
At 3:51:41 PM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
sup? anyways, the crocodile i was confusing it with was saurosuchus....it was a crocodile compared to suchomimus---the dinosaur. sorry for the mix up.
(hey, the names are pretty close, give me a break)
im starting to doubt that it is a baryonyx, but i still dont think its a suchomimus.
Im not sure what to think. When i saw it, the first thing i thought, baryonyx. Our conversation and a good nights sleep has remedied my views a bit, but not to the point that i believe its a suchomimus. Anyways, it would probably be a dinosaur that has been documented for a while, consideringJp and jptlw came out in mid 90's. The suchomimus was discovered in 97, same as jp tlw. That's another thing that would make me believe otherwise, cuz this movie could very well be a prequel/
At 3:06:12 PM on 6/15/2000, Siege_6 said:
OK, Tvbrains13, what is your problem? Go wank off? Yeah, thats really mature of you. We don't even know each other, we can't say something. And anyway, I guess you could say "you won" because i'm not about to stoop down to your lowly level and start telling people to go to hell, and go wank off.
At 11:44:11 AM on 6/15/2000, TV Brains213 said:
HEY KATSURA:
DONT FORGET TO PUT ON YOUR LIST OF GAMES---TWL: CHAOS ISLAND
THAT'S PRETTY COOL
At 11:08:59 AM on 6/15/2000, Tango said:
Hey Katsura! Welcome back. My fav JP game is Warpath. I love the variety of dinos. It even has Suchomimus :) Its true what you say about the logo cherrypicker, but ya gotta admit he's got that sail-spine thing goin' on.
At 9:58:05 AM on 6/15/2000, Katsura said:
Thanks Tnago and Siege.
I realise it's only certain individuals.
Well I am a big dino/ JP fan and it's great to find a great site like this.
Now my view is that logo dino is Suchomimus. However knowing JP, they may end up calling it whatever sounds cool/ deadly.
Well, I don't know if this thread belongs to here (is there a main BBS?)
But I'd like to ask: Do you play JP games? and which is your fav?
Here's a list of what was out:
Jurassic Park (PC/ Amiga)
Jurrasic Park SNES
Jurrasic Park MD/ MS/ GG
Jurrasic Park Sega Arcade
Jurrasic Park 2 SNES
TLW PSX/ SAT
TLW Tresspasser PC
TLW: War Paths PSX
TLW Sega Arcade
I liked the SNES and the TLW arcade game - Why Sega ported HOTD instead of this game onto Dreamcast is beyond me...
Needless to say, there will be new JP3 games for the consoles.
What type of game do you want to see?
Persoanlly I think Capcom's Dino Crisis games are fun, almost like Jurrasic Park Adventure.
In latest footage of Dino Crisis, it looks like they have featured Carnotaurs.
Cherry, the croc you are thinking of might be the gaint
Deinosuchus?
At 1:44:39 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
sorry, back for the last time for sure, when it said the sail reached over the hips by two feet, well thats at the hips. it must be a good 15 feet from the hip to the neck where the sharp incline in the spine is shown in the logo. Anywho, the logo may turn out to be a fake and we would be disputing over nothing.
well, ciao for now and for good...maybe
At 1:41:36 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
Im back but this is my last post for sure tonight
I saw that quote at National geo, and i think i have the magazine upstairs somewhere, but thats not the point. when i watched the video, i did see a sail, but it ws not like the sail in the logo, it was kind of like a single ridge of stegosaur plates that were parallel and flat ont he top.
anyways...bye...again
At 1:40:35 AM on 6/15/2000, Tango said:
And here's one more:
The foot-long (30-centimeter-long) thumb claws and powerfully built forelimbs were used to snare fish and other prey as the dinosaur waded in rivers; the thin, bony sail along its back, which reached a height of two feet (0.6 meter) over the hips, may have been brightly colored for display.
At 1:33:50 AM on 6/15/2000, Tango said:
Well even though I ddin't catch you in time tonight, here is still a direct quote I found at National Geographic.
“A dinosaur trying hard to be a crocodile,” is the way paleontologist Paul Sereno describes the 36-foot (11-meter) spinosaur he and his team discovered in a remote part of the Sahara. The animal’s long skull resembles a crocodile’s, and so do its hooklike teeth, which were adapted for eating fish. The animal had huge, muscular forearms, used for grabbing things as it walked on its hind limbs. A sail—probably used for display—ran down its spine.
At 1:31:06 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
ok, well, im going....sleepy..finished exams today. All i can say is that the logo is ambiguous. It has features of a wide range of creatures. It doesnt really resemble suchomimus in the spine department, its more like the spinosaurus, but it physically resembles baryonyx or suchomimus. Whatever happens in the movie and whatever it turns out to be, im sure it'll look great. If you are right kudos to you and whoa nelly to me. If im right, well thats great. Anyways, i'll speak yo you fine people at another time.
Bye
At 1:26:30 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
ok, i just watched parts of the real media. i fast forwarded to the showing of the animal, and the spine shown is definately there although it in not like what is shown in the logo. Im still not convinced. It was only a foot or so high and compared to the size of it as well as with the logo the spine is really not there.
At 1:15:54 AM on 6/15/2000, Tango said:
Well even though I can't show this to you, I have on tape an interview with Sereno from National Geographic Explorer. It shows Suchomimus in all its glory, spine and all. Keep in mind that this spine is not as huge as Spinosaurus' but it definitley is there. This link however will show you a clay model of Suchomimus with his spine. I suggest you watch the video on this site as well. http://www.nationalgeographic.com/dinorama/spino.html
At 1:11:44 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
let me ammend this statement again (long messages not to mention the fact that it is 1:15 makes me a little confused)
the angle doesnt matter. in the logo, there is a sharp incline which starts where the neck ends and spine begins. If you can see the angle of the spine as it rises in the logo and using data from other dinos with spines, you can sort of extrapolate how high the spine would be. You would be able to see the spine over the back of the neck and head in the picture if it was there, not to mention that the image showing the spine at the chicago site was released about a year before the photo in question was taken
At 1:09:09 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
let me ammend this statement
the angle doesnt matter. in the logo, there is a sharp incline which starts where the neck ends and spine begins. If you can see the angle of the spine as it rises in the logo and using data from other dinos with spines, you can sort of extrapolate how high the spine would be. You would be able to see the spine over the back of the neck and head in the picture if it was there, not to mention that the image showing the spine was released about a year after the chicago site anounced the discovery
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At 1:07:02 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
well, two if you include the other subspecies
At 1:06:28 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
sorry, i clearly stated that there was one that i wasnt sure about
At 1:05:46 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
the angle doesnt matter. in the logo, there is a sharp incline which starts where the neck ends and spine begins. If you can see the angle of the spine as it rises and using data from other dinos with spines, you can sort of extrapolate how high the spine would be. You would be able to see the spine over the back of the neck and head in the picture if it was there, not to mention that the image showing the spine was released about a year before the photo was taken
At 1:04:08 AM on 6/15/2000, Tango said:
Spinosaurus aegyptiacus,
Spinosaurus moraccanus,
and Irritator challengeri had the lip curl too.
At 1:02:38 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
i'll believe you once you provide me witha photograph clearly showing a spine with a link to a site clearly saying SUCHOMIMUS. otherwise, it is impossible for u me or anyone to say for sure what it is. u have evidence backing up your statements, but i have photographs and encyclopedias and im pretty well versed in paleontology myself, but probably not as much as you considering im only 17
At 1:01:10 AM on 6/15/2000, Tango said:
Heh, I'm sorry man but the simple fact is that you cannot see the spine at the angle the picture is taken in. It is there though, I don't think paleontologists would lie.
At 12:59:10 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
did u check the site?
At 12:58:28 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
there are only 3 or four known dinosaurs with that curled lip thing....
dilophosaurus
baryonyx
suchomimus
another one (dont know name)
it has to be one of those
At 12:58:09 AM on 6/15/2000, Tango said:
I don't need you to. I have around 18 years behind me of studying paleontology that I know enough about both animals to convince me that the animal in the JP3 logo is Suchomimus.
At 12:56:46 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
tango, check out this site
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/science/DailyNews/dinosaur981112.html
thats a near complete suchomimus....no spine
At 12:55:17 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
no, i was talkin to carnotaur45, noy u tang, but since you're here. i have a feeling it is a baryonyx and not a suchomimus. if u want i can go into greater detail
At 12:55:04 AM on 6/15/2000, Tango said:
Huh, I dunno what to say man. That picture clearly shows Suchomimus with an elongated spine. The thing is man that Suchomimus' spine is not as large as Spinosaurus'. It's nothing madeup. It is something that is recognized and has been said many times by paleontologists, especially Sereno.
At 12:49:18 AM on 6/15/2000, Tango said:
Hypocrite? Don't know where got that from, and I never sent you an article to look at. But mistakes are mistakes, so sorry if I seemed harsh. No hard feelings, k? I'm sure you're fine at dino info.
At 12:48:46 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
we would both be wrong then
At 12:48:25 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
and for all we know, when the movie comes out, it could be a spinosaurus/suhcomimus/baryonyx hybrid
At 12:46:17 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
Another apology
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/science/DailyNews/dinosaur981112.html
a complete skeleton was found of suchomimus, but u should check this site out. the skeleton doesnt have a sail
At 12:37:02 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
_____________________________
"First off, I'm completely shocked to see someone who claims to have knowledge of dinosaurs say that Suchomimus is not a dinosaur. Suchomimus IS a bipedal, carnivorous dinosaur of Niger. Second off, that dino in the picture below is a Suchomimus, no questions asked, and the animal biting it is a croc! "
______________________________
I agree about what you said here and i apologize for my mistaken information, but let me assure you that i am no slouch regarding these matters
At 12:34:43 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
im not trying to sound cocky about information, i apologized about my mistake, the crocodile is however a massive reptile with a similar name. Everyone makes mistakes, but that doenst make me wrong and you right. maybe you should read YOUR OWN article and get YOUR OWN facts straight. Im not trying to be rude, im just trying to make you less of a hypocrite than you are.
At 12:31:31 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
and actually, if you read the first paragraph of the article at
http://dinosaur.uchicago.edu/Suchomimus.html
, your link, it says only a claw and skull were found which means the spine was added for decoration by the artist. it is uncertain whether or not the animal had a spine.
At 12:31:27 AM on 6/15/2000, Tango said:
Wow, I'm sorry cherrypicker, but as much as you say you know about dinos, you are completely wrong on this one. First off, I'm completely shocked to see someone who claims to have knowledge of dinosaurs say that Suchomimus is not a dinosaur. Suchomimus IS a bipedal, carnivorous dinosaur of Niger. Second off, that dino in the picture below is a Suchomimus, no questions asked, and the animal biting it is a croc! How can you tell me that the animal biting the Suchomimus is a Suchomimus? Go to the zoo sometime and check them out. I'm sorry but if we had more people that knew about dinos in here then I would be backed up with no doubts. You sound pretty cocky about your facts, but before you say anything, you've gotta get your facts straight. Now listen: Baryonyx and Suchomimus were both fisheaters. Suchomimus had a large spine (like the one in the picture below) and lived in Niger, an environment where there were very large crocodiles.
At 12:27:38 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
i should also point out that those spines are very hard to preserve. no complete skeleton on a baryonyx has been found - only a few specimens exist- i have a feeling the suchiomimus spines are added for effect like the frill on the diliophosaurous (spelling?) and its small size in JP1
At 12:23:47 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
If you read down a bit on your link, it mentions that suchomimus was a close cousin of baryonyx. It is fairly possible that we are both right. It was my mistake on stating the suchiomimus as the crocodile, i was mistaking it with another with a similar name, so an apology there, but i still hold that it is a baryonyx. And...we made this post go from 45 to 73. cool
At 12:11:50 AM on 6/15/2000, Carnotaur45 said:
Yay! I found the link! Happy day! (ok, that was lame)
http://dinosaur.uchicago.edu/Suchomimus.html
I miss-quoted, though, it's: "It was a dinosaur trying hard to be a crocodile."
At 12:08:59 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
well actually, that logo embellished the spine. Spinosaurus didnt have that type of skull, it was a member of the family spinosauridae. those dinosaurs had skulls much more like an albertosaurus but less rigid and smaller.
and ill be back with more info on suchiomimus in a second
At 12:03:58 AM on 6/15/2000, cherrypicker said:
you might be talking about a charcahrodontosaurus, gigantosaurus or a Deinocheirius- that thing was like a massive gallimimus, but this things arms were 8 feet long each. probably bigger than a trex but no complete skeleton has been found
At 12:02:56 AM on 6/15/2000, Carnotaur45 said:
I totally agree with you there man! Carnotaurs and Ankleosaurs ALL THE WAY!! YES! I can't believe I've found a place where I can have an intelligent conversation about dinosaurs with someone!
At 12:00:11 AM on 6/15/2000, Carnotaur45 said:
Wait a minute, you just posted those pics and said that they were the Barxonyx (did I get it right?), correct? Well, by doing so, you proved yourself wrong, because your dinosaur has no spine-frill-thingy. Suchomimus does. And it WASN'T a crocodile. I quote: "The Suchomimus was a DINOSAUR trying verry hard to be a Crocodile..." Where the hell was that page!?
At 11:59:25 PM on 6/14/2000, cherrypicker said:
oh, and you're right about onthing, there has got to be some carnotaurs in that movie, although, there were carnotaurs in Dinosaur and that sucked ass. We need some dinos that have never been seen-
archyopteryx (bird/dino)
oviraptor
diplodicus
ankylosaurus
iquanodon
gigantosaurus
charcharodontosaurus
- and for non dinos
suchiomimus (for an underwater scene)
Charcharodon megalodon (giant great white sharks)
At 11:55:18 PM on 6/14/2000, cherrypicker said:
At 11:55:11 PM on 6/14/2000, Carnotaur45 said:
I'm going to look like a fool unless I can back that up....where was that page? Hmmm....as soon as I find it I'll post the quote. There's a Carivorus Dino that was a whopping 60 feet long! Why don't they use that for the bad guy...? Where was that site??
At 11:54:39 PM on 6/14/2000, cherrypicker said:
ok, listen it is a baryonyx. a suchomimus isnt even a dinosaur, its a crocodile. Look at the picture near the bottom of the one witht he pterosaurs and the thing in the water. If you look closely, the crocodile coming out of the water is the suchomimus. It was bigger than a trex (suchomimus).
Trust me. Your're arguing with the wrong person. I know im not wrong
At 11:47:33 PM on 6/14/2000, Carnotaur45 said:
You know, it wasn't. I don't care what your book says, but T-Rex is 42 feet long, and that Barynyx (whatever) is only about 36 feet. It's a Suchomimus. Trust us. Now they just need a couple of Carnotaurs...
At 11:34:55 PM on 6/14/2000, cherrypicker said:
ok, here are my pics. if they dont show up, its cuz i dont know how to post them, so just follow the url if they dont work
"http://sites.badassgames.com/dbzdimension/1.gif"
"http://sites.badassgames.com/dbzdimension/2.gif"
these are images i scanned out of my encyclopedia
At 11:12:45 PM on 6/14/2000, cherrypicker said:
and actually, if you look carfully at the picture, the suchiomimus is the one that is coming out of the water, eating the baryonyx. It was longer than a Trex you know.
At 11:11:08 PM on 6/14/2000, cherrypicker said:
i know this for a fact because i have an encyclopedia in my hands (dino encyclo) and plus i have models, and i did a project on dinosaurs recently. trust me. i'll post an image in a few minutes.
At 11:09:27 PM on 6/14/2000, cherrypicker said:
and as for those pictures below with the pterosaurs, it is showing a baryonyx. It is a type of spinosaur...part of the same family.
( A suchomimus was an ancient crocodile, not a dinosaur)
At 11:02:46 PM on 6/14/2000, Tango said:
So how do you know this for a fact?
At 10:58:37 PM on 6/14/2000, cherrypicker said:
I know for a fact that that is the skeleton of a Baryonyx.
Its a pretty kool dino. It was like an alligator/dinosaur. It had a shrp thumb spike that was used to catch fish. I know this cuz i know everythig about dinosaurs. Im serious.
I can wait to see this movie cuz if they put a baryonyx, then for sure its gonna have some other cool dinos.
At 10:40:19 PM on 6/14/2000, dinoherder said:
It's a spinosaurus, look at the fanned back, the number of claws, the nose, it is clearly a Spinosaurus.
At 9:43:30 PM on 6/14/2000, Tango said:
Damn. Thought we could have intelligent conversation for once amongst JP fans without having any children trying to be heard over the adults. But anyways. Hey Carnotaur, it is true that the dinos could be mutants but like we've both said, I highly doubt it. Plus I figure Hammond would probably have the freaks killed instead of putting them on an island. And Trillian, the Suchomimus in the logo is not supposed to be 50 ft. tall. It's just a logo. Do you really think the T-Rex in the original JP logo is that tall? It's just art and not supposed to represent anything with an accurate measure.
At 9:03:55 PM on 6/14/2000, TV Brains213 said:
Siege:
buffallo buffallo buffallo buffallo buffallo buffallo buffallo buffallo buffallo buffallo buffallo buffallo buffallo buffallo buffallo buffallo buffallo buffallo buffallo buffallo buffallo
Aw I am glad I got out of that spell!... How do buffaLLo taste??
Go wank off
At 9:01:59 PM on 6/14/2000, TV Brains213 said:
Dear Siege 6 And Tango And Katsura,
Siege: Go to hell
Tango:Join Siege
Katsura: Leave Now Leave And I saw you looking at my daughter's bum, Stacy Triland
Ha!! I know who you are!!
At 8:38:38 PM on 6/14/2000, Trillian said:
Yeah that's a nifty lookin dino alright, and especially that third pic matches with the logo, but why the hell does it have a claw and why the hell is it about 50 feet tall in the logo? Not to say there's mutant dinos cos a plot like that would just turn out daft, but either the logo is real but doofy or its fake and really really doofy.
At 5:35:09 PM on 6/14/2000, Carnotaur45 said:
"Anyway. Guys, don't bet your luck on this movie bening about mutant dinos. That would be stupid because its not real, and would make the audience think that these mutant creatures actually existed. And don't even think about JP: Chaos Effect being the toy line of JP3 a full three years before the movie actually comes out. Who thought of that one? :)" I did! I did! Anyway, it could verry well be about mutant dinos, because there is no way Hammond would be able to create 100% perfect dinos all the time. There had to be some mutants. But it's highly improbable(sp?) that mutant's are what the film is about. But anyway, this is one bad ass dinosaur. I read it's 36 feet long, and 16 feet tall. Not as big as a T-Rex, but I sure as hell wouldn't want that thing chasing after me. Would you? ALSO, the first two movies had two bad guys, Big boy Rex, and little but deadly Raptors. The Big boy of this movie seems to me the dino on the logo, so what might the little but deadly dinos be? *crosses fingers* Carnotaur with color changing ability like in the Lost World book....
At 4:29:15 PM on 6/14/2000, GoldblumRules said:
For Digalot: Awhile back I posted a topic on the message board about the chances of Laura Dern being in JP3. I think it was a few months ago. Just scroll down and you'll find it.
At 4:25:30 PM on 6/14/2000, Dilophosaurus said:
i'm not saying it's fake, but the TM is really easy to do, it's just text put in, and then once someone knew the domain they could have just made the logo up. I see how that easily could have been made by someone who does graphic design such as myself, but I'm hoping it's real just like the rest of you! I want to give it more time though, I'm still kind of weary after the script thing a couple of weeks ago. However, I guess some of you don't know much about dinos (or aren't up to date on the newest ones), but that is without a doubt a Suchomimus, and why it is over the land, that's a good question, but if you want to get really detailed, the Pterosaurs are flying under it. Suchomimus everyone, Suchomimus.
<img src="http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~luisrey/jpegs/256col/such.jpg" align="center">
<img src="http://www.chichildrensmuseum.org/IMAGES/DINOD1.JPG" align="center">
<img src="http://www.nationalgeographic.com/dinorama/images/photo_spin.jpg" align="center">
<img src="http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/210000/images/_213073_suchomimus_tenerensis_dinosaur_painting_300" align="center">
At 4:16:35 PM on 6/14/2000, D.Vader said:
Its a SUCHOMIMUS, plain and simple. I cant believe the people at AICN think its a raptor, or those at coming Attractions think its some dino-hybrid GIANT that dwarfs the pteranodons flying around like some huge new godzilla creature.
D.Vader =D
At 4:08:49 PM on 6/14/2000, Glen said:
This logo really looks real!
you can even see the small "TM" copyright-sign on the left:-)
and compare it's title (Jurassic Park III) with the website registered by universal (www.jurassic-park-III.com) :-)
Unofficial JP3 website
<a href="http://www.lascincomuertes.com">http://www.lascincomuertes.com</a>
At 3:29:45 PM on 6/14/2000, Siege_6 said:
OK, Katsura don't leave. Just ignore Tvbrains13. He's always like that. And to you mrconica. Whats wrong with kids?! I happen to be one. Plus I already knew about Mega Raptor, i've been looking at it for a while, and have been trying to figure out why they would call that a velociraptor. And finally, to Tvbrains13, learn how to spell buffalo. And if you are going through a "maturing" process as tango so nicely put, then either keep it to yourself, or take it out on someone else somewhere else. We're all trying to have an intelligent conversation and we don't need idiots like you insulting us, telling us to leave or otherwise.
At 3:21:09 PM on 6/14/2000, igetnews2 said:
hey sorry guys, my name is igetnews, but my damn password wasnt working, sooo..
hey utahraptor (love the name) i thought about them making the script they gave him with his name on it, he told me they do that sometimes, but, the script roaming around the net has the same name, so, its the real character's name in the movie (if they keep him).
i'll still try to get more info, i'll email him tomorrow.
-Chris
At 2:27:14 PM on 6/14/2000, Digalot said:
but then again velociraptors are only realy 3 feet tall not 6 so they might have just added the claw to make it look scarier
At 2:00:49 PM on 6/14/2000, Digalot said:
excuse me then the logo shows
At 2:00:05 PM on 6/14/2000, Digalot said:
Im looking at a page on the spinasaur and it dose not havt the big huge claw on the middle finger, and the sail connects much further down the neck then the picture shows.
At 1:47:32 PM on 6/14/2000, Roksx said:
It makes no sence at all, the first two movies had a t-rex, and the 'last one' has a 'spinosaurus'. They should have made all the logo's different, or the same.
At 1:47:17 PM on 6/14/2000, Mr Goodbytes said:
Trillian, It is not the T-Rex streched out. It has more teeth and totally different bone configuration.
At 1:40:46 PM on 6/14/2000, mrContica said:
Hi, I'm another new guy.
anyways, what I was going to say:
There actually WAS a larger and meaner Velociraptor kinda dinosaur. I don't think that what's in that logo is that dinosaur, it looks like a spinosauriade of some sort, but there was a 30ft long dromaeosaurid called Megaraptor.
just so that you know.
some underwater scenes with dinosaurs would be cool tho, makes me remember that scene in Alien ressurection.
But what I don't get is why they can't listen to the fans just a LITTLE bit and keep those stupid kids OUT of the movies...
Contica
At 1:40:45 PM on 6/14/2000, Digalot said:
I just had a funny thought guess who was in October sky laura Dern. maybe a cameo by Dr. Sattler is in order
At 1:39:15 PM on 6/14/2000, Digalot said:
The logo ( if true) kingd of squashes out the idea of a kid as the main role, i mean it looks more like a hoar logo then a andventure logo. but you also have to take into effect that most of Johnsons movies have kids as the main part/jumanji/october sky
At 1:27:49 PM on 6/14/2000, Digalot said:
It has some truth to it. If you notice the bottom has flying dinosaurs and in a interview with Joe Jonhston he said there would be lots of flying dino's in the movie
At 1:21:48 PM on 6/14/2000, Trillian said:
A) Jurassic Park /// (trying to approximate the dramatic slash marks there) surely is not the real title, they'd give it some subtitle. Or make JP3 subtitle like on TLW.
B) The logo is kinda cool anyway but is it just me or does it look like they just squooshed the original Rex's head to make it (other than that funky spine thing of course)
And if it is a fish-eater why is it towering over the land menacingly?
At 1:11:38 PM on 6/14/2000, Tango said:
No, but I really doubt that that is the case. Its most likely a clever fake or the real deal for the movie.
At 12:41:33 PM on 6/14/2000, Digalot said:
Hello new commer
Has anyone of you thought that it might be just a slogen for the toys and they have all the logos with different dino's on them. after all was taken from the nyc lisence convention ( for the toys)
At 12:02:34 PM on 6/14/2000, Tango said:
hey Katsura, don't leave! You apparently are one of the few JP fans here who know what they're talking about when it comes to dinos. TVBrains213 is obviously going through some kind of maturing process. :) "Look at me! I am TVBrains213! I know T-Rex, raptor, and brontosaurus!" Sorry, but he left himself pretty open there. :)
At 10:56:16 AM on 6/14/2000, Katsura said:
Well thanks TV Brains213.
You know some of us do do this job for a living right?
Anyways, great bbs, won't be coming back soon, bye.
At 10:54:18 AM on 6/14/2000, Tango said:
o....k... Anyway. Guys, don't bet your luck on this movie bening about mutant dinos. That would be stupid because its not real, and would make the audience think that these mutant creatures actually existed. And don't even think about JP: Chaos Effect being the toy line of JP3 a full three years before the movie actually comes out. Who thought of that one? :)
At 10:28:20 AM on 6/14/2000, TV Brains213 said:
I AM SORRY FOR THAT SHOW OF ANGER BUT I AM HAVING VIOLENT MOOD SWINGS.
sorry.
SIEGE6 EATS BUFFALLO!!!
At 10:27:14 AM on 6/14/2000, TV Brains213 said:
OH LOOK AT ME!! IM KATSURA
I SHOW OFF MY BRAINY TALENTS. BUT DEEP DOWN INSIDE I AM JUST LONELY. OH LOOK THIS IS A HAKD;HKALGHDALKGHA;LKJGASHG DINOSAUR THAT BELONGED TO THE ALJFALLKSAGHLKASD ERA AND A FAMILY OF ALKDFHLKADHGLKAG OH LOOK I AM KATSURA!!
At 10:25:06 AM on 6/14/2000, TV Brains213 said:
HEY ALL OF YOU!:
DO YOU REMEMBER THE TOY LINE THAT CAME OUT UNDER JP1 THAT HAD NEW AND IMPROVED LOOKS FOR THE PEOPLE AND DINOS?? THAT'S JUST PROBABLY WHAT CHAOS THEORY OR WHATEVER WAS. THEY WOULD BE GIVING AWAY TOO MUCH IF IT WAS A TOY LINE ABOUT THE NEXT MOVIE THAT WONT COME OUT UNTIL A YEAR. ALSO- SIEGE 6 EATS BUFFALLO!! :0
At 9:32:48 AM on 6/14/2000, Katsura said:
Hi everyone, this is my first time posting here ^_^.
I already had a discussion on another forum on the subject of the logo dino, so I'll cut and paste here:
Baryonyx walkeri vs. Suchomimus tenerensis?
Hi, just wants to say: good guess on Baryonyx. That is actually the first thing I thought of when I saw the logo. but upon more close inspection, I think it's not actually Baryonyx walkeri. Baryonyx was discovered in 1988 in Surrey, England, it belongs to Spinosauridae. Which is a unique group of carnival dinos with some distictive features: Like the crocdile looking jaws (maybe related to their diet). and more distictivly, sale fin like skin memberines on top of their spinal. Hence the name - Spinosauridae. Baryonyx is actually special in Spinosauridae that it (appears) does not posses the back fins. From the logo, one can clearly see that there are enlogated spinal fins. Also, the skeleton does not look like Baryonyx. Thus I'm putting my bet on this dino isactually one of the even more recent discoveries Suchomimus tenerensis (1998), which did appear to posses the spinal fins. It's about 11m long full grown, so, no, this is not T rex rival... Emm, an interesting fact is that one specie of the Spinosauridae is called the Irritator challengeri, let's hope the film does not irritate! As for name/ dino mess up in the film, well, thing is, the species we discovered is only a tiny small part of all dino species, who is not to say there might be a sub specie of Velociraptor that is 2 meter tall? It is only a film after all.
I think many ppl here already guessed the same as me, we will see when the film is released.
At 7:16:41 AM on 6/14/2000, GoldblumRules said:
Oh yeah, one more thing... Hammond is gonna be in this. For two minutes or five or eight, he'll be in it. He is the one returnee I have all faith in returning. Spielberg's character in the films was Hammond: the big entrepeneur with too many ambitions trying to make right what he has done. Very reflective of Spielberg. Malcolm and Grant are another case entirely. Malcolm would be most important to Michael Crichton to return, I mean he brought him back from the dead just so he could be in the LW book! Malcolm will get the token cameo, but much to my dismay and yours, Grant will likely be put on the backburner. If only we fans could write this... drool... mmm... t-rex tongue... OK, it's too late to write anymore. Bye.
At 6:57:32 AM on 6/14/2000, GoldblumRules said:
The logo looks pretty cool to me. If they're headed in a new direction with JP3, this is a good start. I would consider this logo to be official, unless proven otherwise. Sorry to be so late on this one...
At 2:58:47 AM on 6/14/2000, Utahraptor said:
Igetnews, could MIles' name be for the character? or else they put actors names on scripts to make sure the right one gets the right one.
At 2:57:09 AM on 6/14/2000, Utahraptor said:
I'm not sure that is a spine. It's above and below the body. Almsot looks like a sideways ribcage. But a fish eater who enevr met humans would go after humans, especially swiming humans.
At 12:49:40 AM on 6/14/2000, AGant(compy) said:
Heheh I beat you all too it, check the msg boards!
At 12:35:12 AM on 6/14/2000, Tango said:
Alright guys, I'll clear up some confusion. I know some of you guys may not study dinos and just enjoy the JP movies, but I do both. Baryonyx did not have a spine. Spinosaurus did, but this is not a Spinosaurus skeleton. Suchomimus' skeleton looks almost exactly like Baryonyx except for one big feature: it has a large spine! Yes Suchomimus does have a spine like Spinosaurus, just not as large.
At 12:31:40 AM on 6/14/2000, Igetnews said:
hey, belive it or not, i have a friend names "Miles" (yes oddley enough) who foes to homeschool with me, hes 13 years of age and does many things, he did the nasty kid in "Stuart Little" (the mean boat kid) walk ins on shows such as "Mad about you" and "3rd rock from the sun".
anyhow, he told me that he was auditioning for jp3, i was so shocked, (the serires is my favorite) i asked him what he had heard, he said all he had the script in his car. he brought it to me, and i couldnt believe my eyes! it looked official, he said he would give me any other news he would get. just now, when i was at comingsoon.net, i heard the news on this new poster, which led me to read the scripts on the news page, and it was the same exact three page script! another odd thing is that the script had his name in it, but not his last, so what does that mean? are they going to use him? if so, i dont know about him being the lead actor.. if you watch stuart little and others, hes kind of a little small kid, not a lead character (or is this what they want? a little dino freak?) i swear on my head that all i have told you is true! i'll try to fill everyone here on any news i get!
-Chris
At 11:09:49 PM on 6/13/2000, Dilophosaurus said:
Hey guys, geez, I guess I picked the wrong day to go out! I can't wait to see the message board. Deifnitly looks like a Suchomimus to me, this is such a great development, I'll give it time because I don't want to get my hopes built up in case someone's pulling a prank again...This may be real, but all this wolf crying has me waiting. Then again this is quite fun!
At 10:37:40 PM on 6/13/2000, KayMan2K said:
overall cool logo - but the dino looks to deformed to be the final logo. They will stick with the traditional T-Rex most likely.
At 9:59:52 PM on 6/13/2000, Pricyber said:
It makes sense that there are mutated dinos cause you know they couldn't possibly got them right the first time around... they had to experiement.
Any ways, I like how the logo looks more fierce and scarier than the last one, but I still prefer my Rex. Hopefully this one will take the part well.
At 9:44:00 PM on 6/13/2000, Bugz said:
Heres a good pic of what the dino in the poster probably is. I pretty much wrote off baryonyx since no sail on his back. Suchomimus seems to fit the skeleton to a T.
http://dinosaur.uchicago.edu/Suchomimus.html
At 9:37:34 PM on 6/13/2000, Carnotaur45 said:
Well, you know, Chaos Effect did come out for no real reason, so maybe the movie was supposed to come out shortly after the toy line. But you're right; I doubt it too, it was just a guess. But if it isn't a Baranox or whaever, and not a Spinosaurus, then it must either be a big oopsies, or a mutant dinosaur. It's building a mysteryyyy...
At 9:14:24 PM on 6/13/2000, Mr Goodbytes said:
They have never found a compleat Baryonyx. It could be a Baryonyx, but most likly it is not. I doubt it is Chaos Effect. A spin-off of a toy line??? I doubt that.
At 9:07:40 PM on 6/13/2000, Moreirasaurus said:
That IS a Baryonyx, but it's wrong. Baryonyx didn't have that spine. Spinosaurus did. But that's not a Spinosaurus skull.
So, it's wrong.
And if it's wrong, how could it be true?
-Moreirasaurus
At 8:47:34 PM on 6/13/2000, Siege_6 said:
I just look that baryonyx uo, and it didn't have that spine, unless they are all mutated dinosaurs.
At 8:44:22 PM on 6/13/2000, Siege_6 said:
Hey, I don't know. I was just going on what the spine indicated to me. And why would an underwater predator be the main dino? Thats just weird. I don't even know what those dinosaurs are. I never really studied dinosaurs hard. I was interested in them when I was young (like 4-11), and am just getting into them again.
At 8:40:40 PM on 6/13/2000, Carnotaur45 said:
Well, it has those Raptor claws on it's hands...so...maybe it's Site C for Chaos Effect? It could be the island that Hammond put all the mutant Dinos on, and the picture looks like a Raptor/Rex thing. Of cource, it could be those two you guys were talking about...
At 8:39:25 PM on 6/13/2000, Dan said:
Remember the news item a few months back about the Director of Photography on JP3? How he was an expert in underwater photography................. hmmmmmmmmm :)
-Dan
At 8:16:56 PM on 6/13/2000, Mr Goodbytes said:
Baryonyx is a fish eater also.
At 8:14:50 PM on 6/13/2000, Bugz said:
I agree..the look of the skeleton seems more like suchomimus than baryonyx. Really makes me wonder why they would pick this guy.
At 8:11:12 PM on 6/13/2000, wjw said:
Tango is right. Its a suchomimus or a barynox. I'm betting suchomimus because it is supposed the be the same size as a T. rex.
The only problem is suchomimus is a fish eater. I don't think they would go chasing after humans, unless the people are swimming.
At 7:58:41 PM on 6/13/2000, Tango said:
Dan this is either baryonyx or suchomimus. I'm betting it will be suchomimus, but the claws in the logo indicate baryonyx. We'll just see. Definitley not spinosaurus though.
At 7:58:08 PM on 6/13/2000, Bugz said:
This is what the dino is. Why this thing would be the main baddie, I dont know.http://www.dinodon.com/dictionary/baryonyx.html
At 7:44:37 PM on 6/13/2000, jonney claw said:
Hey, I've heard several rumors that they are introducing a new, larger predator to be the main dino in the flick and I believe it may be a hybrid of some kind, maybe a Rex and a raptor. I've also heard the title could be Jurassic park: Extiction. All sounds cool
At 7:42:13 PM on 6/13/2000, Siege_6 said:
Wow thats a sweet logo. And I think it might be a spinosaurus. I'm just saying that because of it's back. And I can't wait to hang that one up in my room with the other two posters I have! But i'm also saddened that if this is the real poster, then whats going to happen to T-Rex? And is that going to be the new main dino? So many questions about T-Rex!
Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment
|
|
Add DJP3P to your newsreader!
|
