|
[ Log In ] [ Register ]
means the user is online now! At 3:22:11 PM on 5/14/2001, Tyler-2000 said: How many feet tall was the T-Rex? Brach? In the trailer where the spino was running along the fence, it didn't look any bigger than the T-Rex.
At 8:43:55 AM on 5/14/2001, Jurassiclaw said: 65 FEET ? Horner is drunk or somethin'. Maybe they meant 45, TOP 55, but 65 ???!!! Damn, BIG!!!
170 shots ??? Told ya guys don't worry, that's a LONG movie !!!
At 6:21:27 AM on 5/13/2001, Sture! said: Hmm 65 feet that is almost 20 meters. Hmm that's maybe a little tall...?
At 6:05:25 AM on 5/13/2001, Evilgrinch said: It's pointless to have a film that is all effects, and little else.
At least Jp had an entertaining story as well.
At 5:49:37 AM on 5/13/2001, Sinorsis said: yeah, but what's an "fx film" without substance? What is anything without substance?
Beware of growing comfortably numb to this superficial world.
At 3:28:05 AM on 5/13/2001, spinovstrex said: AND YES IT DOES MATTER IF THERE ARE MANY FX IN THIS DAMM FILM,AND HOW DARE YOU THINK NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THIS IS JURASSIC PARK FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!!!!!!! ITS AN FX FILM!!!!!!!!!
At 11:28:11 PM on 5/12/2001, Drakkenfyre said: spinovstrex, why is every post you make an idiotic ALL CAPS post?,
-Drakk )))
At 11:08:00 PM on 5/12/2001, mrjoanofarc said: I can't wait... 170... :-)
Who says graphics aren't everything?
http://www.geocities.com/spinocentral/
At 10:47:56 PM on 5/12/2001, Horizon said: I think that the Visual Effects won't make the movie, But I also think that VFX won't harm the movie either. As long as its got the plot tightly secured and the characters well developed. It should be really good. As for the Typo, heh, the media always do that, they call it "Creative Writing".
I'm just glad that most of the CG effects shots (from what I've seen) are in broad harsh daylight, so we can see all the glorious detail and skinning that ILM put into their Dinosaurs. In the previous films most of it was at night and hardly seen.
At 10:01:51 PM on 5/12/2001, Sinorsis said: exactly...
used in the wrong way "The Force"....(or in this case, CGI), ...can be deleterious.
At 9:12:38 PM on 5/12/2001, Tyrannosaurus said: 65 feet tall, lol.
At 8:45:06 PM on 5/12/2001, kiyone said: Yes, SW:TPM had many more effect shots... but with so many of them involving Jar Jar Binks, what's the point?
At 8:10:16 PM on 5/12/2001, Oviraptor said: <i>It's a typo, the biggest one in the world.</i>
At 7:43:45 PM on 5/12/2001, T-rex Man said: At least 20ft up.
At 7:40:31 PM on 5/12/2001, T-rex Man said: The spino can't be 65 foot tall, impossible!!!
At 4:53:59 PM on 5/12/2001, Sinorsis said: it's not about how many cgi shots you have, it's how you use them that counts. You can either use a book to keep a fire going, or you can use it to change your entire perspective on life.
At 4:43:46 PM on 5/12/2001, Tyrannotaur said: Its all about the gore there must be GORE!!!!!!!BWHAHAHAHA!!!!!
At 12:39:32 PM on 5/12/2001, Chapter_11 said: Calm down. Effects mean nothing. If it has a good plot and story, it will be a hit. Look at Pearl Harbor. Lots of explosions and nothing else.
At 12:28:18 PM on 5/12/2001, spinovstrex said: SHUT UP YOU BUNCH OF GAYS!!!!!!!!! YOU THINK THAT THIS MOVIE WILL BE A VISUAL EFFECTS FEAST!!!!?????!!!!! GIVE ME A BREAK,STAR WARS HAD OVER 2,200 SPECIAL EFFECTS SHOTS IN IT!!!!!! IM SURE THE MUMMY RETURNS IS A MUCH BETTER MOVIE IN TERMS OF SUMMER SPECTACLE AND HAS LOADS MORE SPECIAL EFFECTS IN IT!!!!!!1
At 12:08:26 PM on 5/12/2001, Tango said: Wow 65 feet. Nice typo.
At 11:17:23 AM on 5/12/2001, Cheetah167 said: Leaps forward and gobbles!?! That is so cool!
-Mr. O
At 10:51:16 AM on 5/12/2001, Mallon said: 65 foot tall _Spinosaurus_, eh? Seems that thing gets bigger and bigger all the time!
At 10:34:26 AM on 5/12/2001, dinohunter said: That's supposed to say comment
At 10:32:11 AM on 5/12/2001, Evilgrinch said: Poor old John Diehl.
At 10:29:22 AM on 5/12/2001, dinohunter said: I'm the first commoeny
Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment
|
|
Add DJP3P to your newsreader!
|