|
[ Log In ] [ Register ]
means the user is online now! At 3:22:48 AM on 6/10/2000, Utahraptor said: Sicne Johnston si sos et on remaking TLW, he should at least come up with a better idea then Gilligan's Dino Island. People always said the 3rd film will suck withotu Speilberg directing. Who knew they meant plotwise. Well, we cna always petition for a real trilogy final film when this one bombs Unviersal into the biggest embarrassment in film history.
At 9:22:49 AM on 6/9/2000, Embryo said: Well I noticed that jurassicpark-embryo.com was registered by Universal. It was first rumoured this was the title back in December. Could it be true. Oh and is it true that Joe wants another TLW-type adventure? I'm sorry but that dissapoints me. I think it's confirmed that Sorna will be used for JP3. Joe said that the third film will be a lone sequel. Not much to do with the originals. Here is a possible plot:
Tourists are caught in storm while sailing around the islands. They wash up on Sorna. They know the VC is there but not sure how to get to it. And the rest is just TLW, trying to find it and avoiding dinos along the way. I hope this ain't true because it sounds very boring! IT BETTER HAVE A PLOT THIS TIME!
At 6:35:06 PM on 6/8/2000, Siege_6 said: Oh, I see.
At 11:28:41 PM on 6/7/2000, GoldblumRules said: You can't find the sites because there are no sites. That's not what this information was about. It was about how Universal has registered the domain names, so no one else on the Net can use them; it doesn't mean they have to put a site up with that domain name, it just means no one else is allowed to legally use the domain name, whatever it may be.
At 8:07:29 PM on 6/7/2000, Siege_6 said: Uh, I can't seem to find the sites, so was this a rumor or fact?
At 10:02:47 AM on 6/7/2000, TV Brains213 said: didnt we already know this??
At 3:35:26 AM on 6/7/2000, Utahraptor said: Perhaps they already registered the name? I believe Jurassic Park: Embryo and Extinction were already registered.
At 4:46:21 PM on 6/6/2000, Glen said: I'm sorry, what "newsflash" are you talking about?
At 4:44:50 PM on 6/6/2000, Glen said: I guess the real title will be registered by somebody working for Universal, and not by Universal itself. Because otherwise people like us could figure out the title of the movie
At 4:30:08 PM on 6/6/2000, Siege_6 said: Wait, he got rid of it? That news flash was fun. And GoldblumRules is right, it is disturbing to know that Universal doesn't have a name for the movie yet, unless they already do and haven't released it yet or thats just what it's going to be called, Jurassic Park 3 or Jurassic Park III.
At 1:52:53 PM on 6/6/2000, GoldblumRules said: Still it is a convenient mistake.
At 7:56:35 AM on 6/6/2000, Dan said: I didn't MEAN to get rid of it, I messed up. I overwrote the index.asp with an old version (whoops!). I'm going and try to get an old copy back today. -Dan
At 3:41:07 AM on 6/6/2000, Utahraptor said: Remember www.jurassicpark.com I think they sw that and want to keep the JP name fresh.
At 11:30:20 PM on 6/5/2000, GoldblumRules said: It almost sounds like Universal doesn't even know what the title is yet, which is disturbing. Maybe they secured both the traditionally numbered domain and the Roman-numeraled one because they didn't want someone putting up a site like "www.jurassicpark-III.com" so they registered that, while still holding onto www.jurassicpark-3.com." Oh, and thank you for getting rid of the news flash below, Dan. I promise to be more responsible on this one and I hope others can follow this example as well. JP3 guys, JP3!
Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment
|
|
Add DJP3P to your newsreader!
|