|
|
[ Log In ] [ Register ]
 means the user is online now!
WHY DOES DAN THINK WE GIVE A SHIT ABOUT THIS!!!!!!
At 3:21:57 AM on 3/17/2001, Utahraptor said:
Since some dinos were found with skin impressions indicating scales (Carnotaurus?), I'd say mroe proof for scaly dinos than feathered dinos.
At 1:37:04 PM on 3/16/2001, Mallon said:
If we have the skull, if we have the body proportions, if we have fossil evidence proving Universal wrong, then we can say that their dinosaurs aren't accurate. We have all these things.
(And why do you doubt feathered dinosaurs so much? In the same regard, who's to that the scaly creatures were real dinosaurs?)
At 9:22:48 AM on 3/16/2001, Seth Rex said:
actually nobody's accurate considering we have absolutely no official 'proof' of anything we say the dinosaurs did back then, nore can we say what they looked like. We can't even officially prove that the creatures with feathers were real dinosaurs.. i mean come on guys, this is a world full of speculation. nothing we say can really be taken seriously since there's no actuall evidence. the things we call the proof are only remnents of what could have actually been.
At 5:02:44 PM on 3/15/2001, ih8wasps said:
my thoughts exactly Mallon.
At 3:48:09 PM on 3/15/2001, Mallon said:
There goes Universal talking about how 'accurate' their dinosaurs are again. Liars.
Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment
|
|
Add DJP3P to your newsreader!
|
