|
[ Log In ] [ Register ]
means the user is online now! At 8:15:09 PM on 12/6/2000, GoldblumRules said: 40% of Jurassic Park is the finest adventure novel of the 20th century. 40% of it is science and details which are really interesting and coherent for layman's terms. Then there's a good 20% that does in fact drag the pace down too much for its own good, such as when Crichton delves into the history of fossilized dino dung which lasts 2 or 3 pages.
At 5:26:05 PM on 12/6/2000, eggy said: It takes a lot of hard work to write a good book. I know. I've tried. You write the book, then you rewrite it after reading it, than do another rewrite, than send it to publishers just for them to tell you to rewrite it... horrible.
PS: Stephen King kicks ass
At 5:01:53 PM on 12/6/2000, Dan said: I think Crichton writes too freaking slow. He takes WAYY too much time, and then comes out with mediocre work like "Timeline". I say writers should just pump books out.. (like Stephen King) -- every once in awhile they get it right. -Dan
At 2:43:37 PM on 12/6/2000, FrogDNA said: Probably no one knows what it's about. If he is working on a book, he probably just started. It took him eight years to write Jurassic Park. Actually I think Michael Crichton writes at good speed, I mean all the research he has to do and putting the storie together can be a lot of work for a author. He makes his stories blend together perfectly. So if he is making a new book, it won't be out fot at least 2 years.
Also, If any of you think it's going to be Jurassic Park 3, don't count on it. We all know how much Crichton hates sequles, which is somthing I do agree woth him on.
The only reson Im going to see Jurassic Park 3 is because of the new dinos.
At 1:33:56 PM on 12/6/2000, Seige_6 said: Does anyone know what it's about?
Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment
|
|
Add DJP3P to your newsreader!
|