|
|
[ Log In ] [ Register ]
 means the user is online now!
ahh yes, Raptor Strike, we did have some good times shutting that little shit down. where is he??
At 9:51:20 PM on 3/13/2005, Raptor Strike said:
Hey boys, lets not leave me outta this. I've picked many-a-fight with Jimmy back in the day. But t'was all in good fun.....well, no it wasn't. That kid annoyed the hell outta me.
At 10:44:10 PM on 2/15/2005, conor said:
VINSFELD AND CONOR ARE BACK TO KICK JIMMY ASS AGAIN!!
man, we've been bashing that kid as a team for like..two years now.
At 12:20:54 AM on 2/15/2005, Vinsfeld said:
yeah i miss kicking his ass, that piece of shit.
jimmy if u read this... go sit on daddys dick, faggot!
At 7:11:38 PM on 2/11/2005, conor said:
i miss him because i miss those freaking annoying shit comments. and i miss ripping him to shreds.
At 6:18:24 PM on 2/11/2005, raptor2000 said:
I don't see how you can miss him...he was so freaking annoying.
At 1:51:41 PM on 2/10/2005, conor said:
wouldnt that be fucked if he was dead? we'd never know.
At 12:09:32 AM on 2/10/2005, conor said:
cause jimmy sucks! and his sucking is timeless!
I do miss him though.
At 12:30:25 PM on 2/9/2005, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
Seriously, what's the point of that?
At 5:07:52 PM on 2/8/2005, raptor2000 said:
Some people can never let go of grudges.
I have something of a problem with that myself but jimmy hasn't even been seen on this site in monthes so that was pretty random and pointless. Bash on him all you want to when he says stupid stuff but when he hasn't said anything in monthes just drop it.
At 4:09:11 PM on 2/8/2005, PorterM7Z said:
And you announce this why?
At 10:07:48 AM on 2/8/2005, Vinsfeld said:
jimmy 345 can eat shit tonight
At 12:09:10 AM on 2/6/2005, raptor2000 said:
BigM, if you would freaking look down 2 comments you would see if there was any big JP4 news or not.
At 9:22:12 AM on 2/5/2005, Aragorn said:
Yeah, there is. Go to the JP section of the message board. it's beyond me why Dan hasn't posted anything on it yet.
At 7:41:38 AM on 2/5/2005, BigM said:
Is there any new news for JP4?
BigM
At 4:40:53 PM on 2/4/2005, raptor2000 said:
If this was true, that would be awesome, but I kind of find it hard to believe. Maybe if it was from a more reliable source.
At 1:16:02 PM on 2/4/2005, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/news.php?id=1727
JPIV casting rumor!
At 11:27:17 AM on 2/4/2005, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
What the hell are you on?
I hope it's good.
At 5:10:50 PM on 2/3/2005, Pazz Kat said:
I'll be your friend!!.... no, you wear glassy you geek. I mean, atleast I was smart to get laser eye surgery and stalk up on supplies of people, I knew this day would come -glares eyes- Ge'loz geeky, bwahahaha :3
At 5:08:56 PM on 2/3/2005, Pazz Kat said:
New Post: Dan creates a random new topic so we don't have to dawdle in a sad one. No, he doesn't even remember us *sobs* 372 feet is... mediocre... I could do bigger, AH HA, BRING IT GOD. WHAT'S THAT!? I'll stop there. >.>; boredom... nap setting in... zZzZ.... I'll see the last SW movie just to finish it for once, I mean God, watching all but 1. Did that with LOTR. Batman, what's with the sudden sparked interest in Batman again? A new batman cartoon series, and now movie, huh... how odd.
At 1:12:05 PM on 2/3/2005, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
Haha Geekgasm. Would such movies include Episode III: Everything's Fucked? And Batman Begins?
They do for me.
They do a lot for me.
Glad to see I'm not the only one left, broken glasses suck with no friends!
At 11:40:26 PM on 2/2/2005, PorterM7Z said:
Oh, and yeh I saw the Sound of Thunder trailer quite some time ago. Like summerish cos we used to have a September 04 release date for it back when I worked at that theatre, but alas, no dice. I'm looking forward to it cos I have vague memories of reading the Bradbury story in eight grade. If the effects are improved some post-trailer (which is why I'm hoping it's being delayed so long), it may have a chance to be quite the nifty treat in the already-dupped Year of the Geekgasm.
At 10:25:08 PM on 2/2/2005, raptor2000 said:
I'm still here as well...there's just seldom any new comments to respond to.
At 10:03:33 PM on 2/2/2005, PorterM7Z said:
And then your glasses break.
I'm still here kinda. Still read all the new posts on the main page. I just didn't wanna post under this topic cos it was kindof a downer and my posts are usually happy and shenanigan-like. So that's why I've been quiet. But aye, I'm still here.
At 11:42:43 AM on 2/2/2005, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
Hello? Is anybody here?
I guess I'm the the only one left.
Well at least I have my books.
At 2:40:10 PM on 1/28/2005, conor said:
I guess eh!?
At 1:52:06 PM on 1/20/2005, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
Yeah, that definitely sounds like a modified raptor sound from JP.
Good call.
I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
At 8:36:14 PM on 1/19/2005, raptor2000 said:
I mean 372.
By the way, I just watched the trailer...the beginning sucked, looks too much like a futuristic version of TLW. Hunters going back in time to hunt the greatest predators that ever lived. Plus the dinosaurs look pretty fake. You can tell they are CGI. However, the rest of it - however unoriginal the messing with history and throwing off the present/future may be - looks like it could be good if it's done right.
Also...is it just me, or does that thing at the very very end of the trailer sound alot like a raptor screech from JP?
At 8:30:01 PM on 1/19/2005, raptor2000 said:
Yeah I was about to say, 600 km is like 312 miles lol.
At 6:03:35 PM on 1/19/2005, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
Still though, I think A Sound of Thunder is worth looking at. I think everyone here shares the loves of Dinos, and even though the Land Before Time (1-500) may not be up to snuff, a CG dino flick other than JP just might have a shot.
Disney's "Dinosaur" was the last attempt other than a JP movie, and talking Dinosaurs ("A-Lan!") wasn't a great idea.
But this? Looks like a "The Mummy," so it might do well.
At 5:41:34 PM on 1/19/2005, fordprefect said:
Wait...What am I typing?
600m not Km...
Yeah, that's the mix up.
At 5:37:19 PM on 1/19/2005, fordprefect said:
Uh...the ocean is 7 miles deep at its deepest point.
There have been tsunamis 600km high in the past.
At 3:23:17 PM on 1/19/2005, raptor2000 said:
I don't know about 600Km high....the ocean isn't even that deep at it's deepest point.
At 1:36:46 PM on 1/19/2005, fordprefect said:
'You can go through one though'
Some Tsunamis have lengths over 100 km from head to tail.
Try going through that. These Mega Tsunamis get up to 600Km high.
At 10:09:51 PM on 1/18/2005, raptor2000 said:
No fictional dinosaur movie has ever been good except for the Jurassic Parks. Unless you count King Kong, I suppose.
At 9:08:36 PM on 1/18/2005, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
Or this year rather...
At 6:16:47 PM on 1/18/2005, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
Has anyone seen the trailer for A sound of Thunder?
A dinosaur movie? Next year?!
HELL YES!
At 5:08:15 AM on 1/15/2005, Contica said:
I think we got it explained pretty good. And Driveshaft, you're in fact hinting that I'm saying the oposite of what I really am saying. Guess I could have been more clear. But yeah, not dangerous before it gets a chance to build up. So If an earthquake happens in the middle of the atlantic or something, it could very well just fade away before it reaches the shore, and nobody would really notice anything. If it gets close to land while still being strong, that's when things start to happen
At 10:19:07 PM on 1/13/2005, raptor2000 said:
You can't go under a wave...it goes all the way down. You can go through one though. But you're right, all that happened was they got moved a little bit.
At 9:04:19 PM on 1/13/2005, krazykid3001 said:
The divers are fine because they were under the wave. There was water all around them so the force wasn't that great, they did get moved a little but nothing big.
its the same thing as a regular wave. Go under one and you won't get hit as hard as if you were above the water.
At 8:55:29 PM on 1/13/2005, Pazz Kat said:
No, here's the thing, a Tsunami starts when a large underwater force occurs, at that moment, a shockwave is sent out in the form of a wave which is not big. Given its location, the tsunami can take hours and hours to reach anywhere. The tsunami at start, in the deep ocean is small, with all of its power on the surface for the main part, since it's so far down to the bottom of the ocean. As soon as it reaches the continental drop, going inland, the wave starts to build tremendous force, which at this time the force also starts to go deeper, to the ground in order to support and move a fast moving wave. Of course, it doesn't have to hit anything but the chances of that are generally very slim.
At 5:48:28 PM on 1/13/2005, raptor2000 said:
Driveshaft is right...a tsunami is a tsunami regardless of whether it is on land or not.
At 5:05:03 PM on 1/13/2005, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
Hate to break it to you Contica, but a Tsunami is defined as a very large ocean wave caused by an underwater earthquake or volcanic eruption.
So what do you mean it's not a tsunami until something hits against it?
At 5:01:52 AM on 1/13/2005, Contica said:
Well, now I didn't really mention how far out you have to be, but no, I'm not wrong.
Off course you couldn't be close to the shore, but remember this. Shores can be pretty big, and the waves will start building up pretty far away from dry land. I guess I could have been more clear. But the fact remains: The tsunami doesn't become a tsunami before something hits against it.
At 9:14:29 PM on 1/12/2005, Pazz Kat said:
So... I was right. Although I didn't take it in so much in depth.
At 3:59:10 PM on 1/12/2005, fordprefect said:
'As for divers being okay, there's an easy explanation. no matter how great a wave like this, you can barely notice it when you're at sea or under water. It's when all the pressure hits something shit starts to happen. So when the wave meets the shore or rocks it will start to rise and become dangerous (or so the scientists say:)'
That's untrue. For this to have been the case, the divers would have had to have been pretty far out.
At 1:15:13 AM on 1/12/2005, Pazz Kat said:
Untrue with tsunamis. Unlike a regular wave where all the energy is on top, a tsunami has energy all the way through the wave, which allows them to gain so much momentum, that and their sheer size when they start to collapse. I *used* to be able to sense trains when I was like, 1-4 years old like 5-10 mins before they actually arrived near my house. I've heard that elephants broke free of their chains *oh help us the chains ain't strong enuff* grabbed children and ran for the hills, saving the parents as well.
At 5:05:14 PM on 1/11/2005, raptor2000 said:
Yeah....if I'd seen all the animals suddenly running for higher grounds I would thought "hmmm...maybe I should follow them"
At 7:19:56 AM on 1/10/2005, Contica said:
Some speculate in that no animals were harmed because they can sense things like this. It's the same as when dogs or horses or whatever get uneasy when the weather is getting bad. If I remember correctly all of the animals ran to the hills and safety. Kinda strange if nobody noticed how all the animals suddenly fled.
As for divers being okay, there's an easy explanation. no matter how great a wave like this, you can barely notice it when you're at sea or under water. It's when all the pressure hits something shit starts to happen. So when the wave meets the shore or rocks it will start to rise and become dangerous (or so the scientists say:)
At 9:49:58 PM on 1/7/2005, Matthew said:
Will be praying for him, his family, and the other victims of the tsunami.
At 12:54:37 PM on 1/4/2005, BigM said:
My symphaty and compassion for the family.
BigM
At 1:24:36 AM on 1/2/2005, Brer Human said:
Get real, people. Just because they mention one person dying (westerner or not) it does NOT mean they (the media?) do not care about the other people that died. I offer no apologies for knowing who Richard Attenborough is and for not knowing (yet) the names of every other single person on the planet. But I do sincerely believe that every single person on the planet is just as valuable as everyone else.
At 2:15:31 PM on 1/1/2005, raptor2000 said:
I agree with Neelis.
Anyway, I still think it is bizarre that there were hardly any animals killed/found dead from the tsunami, and how a pair of divers diving in the are were unharmed.
At 1:29:33 PM on 1/1/2005, Neelis said:
I think that, although it is tragic, the media give too much attention to western people who got injured or died, while we should focus on the local people who are hit by this: they have no house, no food, no water, no work, no money. The tourists from Europe, America, Australia etc: what happened to them is tragic, but they will come back home and be surrounded by loving family members and friends who will be there for them: they will get professional help: they might even get money. The locals will stay behind without anything. It's more important to focus on them than on the tourists.
At 9:59:30 PM on 12/30/2004, CeratosPit said:
In regards to krazykid, I personally do not pray for the dead or the living for that matter. Que sera sera. I only ask things through prayer out of desPeration.
I do find it interesting, however that no wild animals were harmed in the making of this natural disaster.
At 7:04:59 PM on 12/30/2004, raptor2000 said:
That's why I said "all these people" instead of specifying anyone.
At 6:27:19 PM on 12/30/2004, krazykid3001 said:
How about we pray for the hundreds of throusands that most likely died. News stories like these piss me off. Let's report on one persons's death, or that 7 Americans are dead. Frankly who gives a shit, these people are no different then the ones that lived there and died. 5 million or so people have lost everything by this event and we will worry about one family, or just the Americans? Or Europeans? It sickens me.
At 5:07:02 PM on 12/30/2004, raptor2000 said:
Yeah I understand about the expectations to double. They only label someone dead if they find the body, which is why so many people are still listed as missing....but most of them are never found because their bodies are swept out to sea. But yeah, I really do feel sorry for all of these people. Keep them in your prayers.
At 9:14:23 AM on 12/30/2004, CeratosPit said:
Whoa...
I'm generally pretty cold and unaffected when it comes to huge tragedies (possibly from being desensitized to violence by TV) when it happens to nobody I know.
But my heart goes out to poor Sir Attenborough and thus vicariously to all those in Indonesia and Malaysia and Phuckit and all the other places affected. What an awful thing to happen. EsPecially right after Christmas.
At 7:11:09 AM on 12/30/2004, mrprongs said:
Tragedy, Jimmy. And some 80,000 with expectations to double in the end.
At 12:54:31 AM on 12/30/2004, Jimmy 345 said:
God Bless them and all of the victems of this terrible tragity. Whats the death toll now?
At 3:05:54 PM on 12/29/2004, Dan said:
Oops, dont tell my grammar teacher ;)
-Dan
At 3:04:34 PM on 12/29/2004, conor said:
that's really sad.
At 2:16:46 PM on 12/29/2004, fordprefect said:
It's 'Affected' Dan, not 'Effected'.
Thanks for the mention, and my condolences to the family.
The town is pronounced foo-ket
At 10:35:40 AM on 12/29/2004, raptor2000 said:
Holy shit....that's terrible. I will pray for the family.
Interesting town name though....Phuket. Sounds an awful lot like....something else, but I'm sure that's not how it's pronounced.
Anyway, my condolences to the Attenborough family.
At 10:30:13 AM on 12/29/2004, Phily said:
damn... condolences..
Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment
|
|
Add DJP3P to your newsreader!
|
