|
|
[ Log In ] [ Register ]
 means the user is online now!
lmao
Nicely done.
At 2:15:43 AM on 12/8/2004, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
Hahahaha that's awesome!
Porter, you never fail at making me laugh.
At 8:11:47 PM on 12/7/2004, PorterM7Z said:
However I'm convinced that Shumacher kindof accidentally made B&R suck so bad. After seeing Phone Booth, Tigerland, Lost Boys, and just the teaser for Phantom of the Opera, I'm convinced the guy's a decent director. He must've made some kind of side bet with a friend back in 1995:
Pal: "Damn, Joel! I can't believe Warner Brothers let you put nipples on the costumes!"
Shumacher: "I know, dude! I was totally kidding when I suggested that too! I just said, 'Hey, since they've already got the rubber pectorals, why don't we give them rubber nipples to boot?' and they were all like, 'Genius!'"
Pal: "I don't think you'll ever be able to top that."
Shumacher: (thinks) "Hmmm.... Maybe I can, pal.... Maybe I can."
(Shumacher and Pal down enough wood alcohol to declare themselves legally dead. Then, as Pal titters, Shumacher picks up the phone and dials a number.)
Shumacher: "Shut up, dude, it's ringing! (snicker) Hello, Warner Brothers? This is Hollywood's Joel Shumacher here. And I'd like to discuss some ideas for my next Batman movie. (snicker) First, I want the nipples to come back.... Except for on Batgirl. (snicker) And eventhough it's called 'And Robin', I think Robin should totally dress up as a rubber-roided version of Nightwing.... Huh? Oh, Nightwing, he's Dick Grayson after leaving the Bat behind.... Who's Dick Grayson? Dick Grayson is Robin.... Okay. Also, I want the bad guy to be Mr. Freeze. But I want him to be like the '60s camp version, with the bad puns and stupid-looking costume.... Who should play him? Umm....."
Pal: (drunkenly shouts) "FUCKIN' ARNOLD, DUDE!!!"
Shumacher: "Arnold Schwarzenegger!.... Huh? Box office gold, you say?... Huh." (awkwardly) "Okay, well, I also want Bane in it but he should just be like a parrot.... You like?.... What else do I got? Uh, well...."
(Shumacher looks at his Pal, who pops open another bottle.)
Pal: "Let's get to work on the script."
At 12:32:55 PM on 12/7/2004, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
Damn! We were so close too...
Batman will rock the house. Chris Nolan's behind it, and I really don't see any way he could screw it up, unless Joel Shumacher was behind it. Which he's not.
At 10:44:08 AM on 12/7/2004, raptor2000 said:
not anymore :-D
At 10:16:33 AM on 12/7/2004, PorterM7Z said:
Not actual JP news, but we were still just a day shiy of three months without an update.
At 6:25:26 PM on 12/6/2004, raptor2000 said:
As for Batman Begins, all I have to say is I hope it is better than Batman and Robin.
At 6:23:49 PM on 12/6/2004, raptor2000 said:
I know what the fucking conversation is about, I started it dumbass.
At 5:15:06 PM on 12/6/2004, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
Porter, thanks for making the bucket more ummm...satisfying?
That sounds bad but oh well.
My most anticipated movies of 2005 are: Everything's Fucked, Batman Begins, A Cold Case
I know there's more but eh.
At 11:55:08 AM on 12/6/2004, Aragorn said:
And we're not even really comparing the titles. We were saying why teh titles in that series changed.
At 11:54:38 AM on 12/6/2004, Aragorn said:
We're comparing the titles, dumbass, not the movies. Maybe you should actualy read the conversation next time before replying.
At 10:47:46 AM on 12/6/2004, raptor2000 said:
Jason X isnt a good movie to compare JP to. Jason X was not only the worst Friday the 13th movie, it was also one of the worst movies I've ever seen. Granted, the scene where he kills the 2 girls in the sleeping bags was pretty funny, but the movie sucked. Comparing Jason X and JP3, or even TLW, both of the 2 JP sequels should be Oscar winners.
At 9:41:09 PM on 12/5/2004, DarthRex said:
Speaking of JPX... I should make you some more fan art...
At 8:44:15 PM on 12/4/2004, PorterM7Z said:
Say, speaking of Jason X, howsabout we show some of that sweet sweet lovin' to JPX:
DINOS IN SPAAAACE!!!!
?
Man, it's been a long long time since that's been mentioned. Oh, the memories.
At 8:36:58 PM on 12/4/2004, Rick Arnold said:
Except they didn't change it because they wanted to... they changed it to Jason because Paramont owns the 'Friday the 13th' title.
The 6th took place on Friday the 13th too.
3 and 4 couldn't because 2-4 all take place within 4-5 days.
At 11:22:08 AM on 12/4/2004, raptor2000 said:
Back to your reference of Friday the 13th though, they have already gotten away from that and started simply calling them Jason. For example, Jason X and Freddy vs. Jason.
I doubt they will ever change Jurassic Park though. Like you said, name reconition. Plus, unlike Friday the 13th, theres no main reacurring bad guy. Unless you consider the dinosaurs to be bad. Then I suppose if you really wanted to get away from the name Jurassic Park you could call it "Dinosaurs X" or "Dinosaurs vs. People".
And yes, we all agree the ending to JP3 sucked. That wouldve been the perfect opportunity for the T-rex to make his comeback ( a different one than the one the spino killed, of course)....allthough those army/navy dudes were pretty heavily armed, so they prolly coulda blown the shit out of any dino who showed up.
Anyway, I think they should always keep the title Jurassic Park, but instead of just adding numbers to the end they should but a new title in front of it, just like The Lost World:Jurassic Park. I mean heck, theres like 14 Land Before Times, and THEY all have different titles.
At 10:00:56 AM on 12/4/2004, PorterM7Z said:
::Sponges the bucket::
So, uh.... Happy late Thanksgiving?.... I'm not sure I can afford my road trip at the end of the year and that bugs me....
What does everyone want for Christmas?
And what're y'all's most anticipated movies of 2005- The year of the prolonged geekgasm?
Top five have to be Serenity, Everything's Fucked, Batman Begins, Sin City, and Hitchhiker's Guide. Anyone else?
A horse walks into a bar. Bartender says, "Hey pal, why the long face?"
The horse says, "Because my wife just left me."
At 2:13:58 PM on 12/3/2004, Aragorn said:
It's called Jurassic Park 3, because it's the third movie, where the first was called Jurassic Park.
It's like Friday the 13th. Most of those don't take place on Friday the 13th. Only the first, second, and 5th I think. It's just for regonition so people know that the movie is part of that series. The second movie IS NOT called The Lost World. It's called The Lost World: Jurassic Park, but that didn't feature a park either, so start bitching about that.
At 4:38:59 AM on 12/3/2004, mrprongs said:
It was on Sorna. That's the only island with dinos anymore. InGen had two, and destroyed eveyrthing on Nublar. Bye bye nice dinos. And the UN controlled the island. Why Mark believed Ellie? Well, why would she lie? As for the ending, all those military men are there, and no dinos attack or show themselves? That's not plausable in a movie. That was the perfect time for a chamelon type Carontaurus to appear next to a vehicle and attack.
At 6:08:57 PM on 12/2/2004, Pazz Kat said:
I was just wondering, rereading the title critisism, can you even CALL it Jurassic Park anymore? There is no park, but the "Jurassic" is still there, Jurassic Park was a good title, The Lost World is a better title then JP: 3 especially since there is no PARK in JP3. Just a question though, regarding JP3, since there were no remaining islands of InGen that HAD dino record/dinos, why did the script writer of JP3 set it on a new island, especially one with an Aviary. It just makes it seem as if it were set on Nublar again. Although, since Sorna did not have an Aviary I suppose you could argue that it was a different breeding site..but then again, the InGen corporation had no genetics / embryos for a lot of the dinos that appeared in JP3, one should set it back on Sorna, that's still a fully functional dino place with disease running rampant, the carnivore / herbivore / omnivore ratio imbalanced yet keeps the dinos in check. --- Don't get me wrong,JP3 wasn't a HORRIBLE movie, I just couldn't help but shaking my head and wondering why they made such a corny ending... why would the army/marine/airforce go INTO Costa Rican (presumable, or other countries') territory, that's just asking for war.. and why would they even BELIEVE her..? As I said it wasn't bad.... it just wasn't good IMO, so please don't like, yell (caps) at me, please. =/
At 5:57:45 PM on 12/2/2004, Pazz Kat said:
Hey, we've borrowed some 'water' to satisfy us from the StarWars department, and little various other places, but, I suppose you're right, the bucket IS dry... and them leaving us like this isn't even suspense, it's insanity.
At 5:50:25 PM on 12/2/2004, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
I have a game I think we all should play. It's called "How long can we keep ourselves entertained while the JP news bucket continually runs dry?"
We're almost at 3 months!
At 12:29:33 AM on 12/2/2004, Pazz Kat said:
-They need to incorporate an Edit button into these posts-
What am I thankful for? Jurassic Park. Yeah...that's all I have to say.
At 12:27:35 AM on 12/2/2004, Pazz Kat said:
No holiday is decent without one showing of JP. What am I thankful for? On the 5 channels my grandmother got in her RV, Jurassic Park showed during Thanksgiving. ^_^
At 7:53:52 PM on 12/1/2004, raptor2000 said:
It's better than "Jurassic Park 3"
At 2:19:37 PM on 12/1/2004, Aragorn said:
Yes, cause 'The Lost World' is such an original and imaginitive title...
At 10:50:30 AM on 12/1/2004, raptor2000 said:
He'll have to make it so the adress stays www.dansjp4page.com instead of going back to JP3. Or, if they decide to get, oh, I dont know, imaginative again and instead of just naming it after the original and popping a number after it give it an original name (Ex. The Lost World: Jurassic Park) then it will be something like www.danstlwpage.com with the initials of that movie in place of TLW.
I suppose it really doesnt matter though. The only decor change needed is at the top of the page changing the /// to IV
At 10:19:27 PM on 11/30/2004, DarthRex said:
Well, raptor2000... considering what happens when you type in www.dansjp4page.com now, I didn't think I needed to bother with logistics... but if, when you type in dansjp4page.com and it still comes here, I would guess that THIS site will get a new decor when it comes time for dansjp4page to emerge. Maybe just to save space? I'd guess that it would be easier just to convert this from jp3 to jp4... I would guess, since it's already both dansjp3page AND dansjp4page.
Enough triffle. Must go read Sandman.
At 3:51:27 PM on 11/30/2004, ellersaur said:
A couple of nights ago I had a dream about a JP4 teaser trailer, and OH MAN did it look kick ass.
If only it were real...
At 10:29:47 PM on 11/29/2004, raptor2000 said:
I agree, however at this point in both TLW and JP3's developement, there was already a page for each.
At 5:41:46 PM on 11/29/2004, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
Amen. We're bored as hell.
At 5:44:05 AM on 11/29/2004, mrprongs said:
I'll settle for a confirmed JP4, then JP4 news, then Dan's JP4 Page. Because right now, what we're doing is exactly what we'd be doing on DJP4P.
At 10:23:57 PM on 11/28/2004, raptor2000 said:
Considering this is a website for a movie released almost 3 years ago (that is insane....seems like just yesterday we were getting pre-release JP3 news), I doubt it will ever pick up again. Now if there was a Dan's JP4 page, that would be cool.
At 10:10:39 PM on 11/28/2004, DarthRex said:
Don't get me wrong... Ian was my favorite character... bu t When I said that he was kinda stupid for a genius I wasn't just referring to the T-Rex incident.
You did know that right?
:P
I might be asking too much, but hopefully this page'll perk up when 2005 comes around.
At 4:54:07 PM on 11/28/2004, conor said:
Exactly raptor2000...there must be some solution.
At 4:19:00 PM on 11/28/2004, raptor2000 said:
I agree with conor.
Buy an American translation book....or take an English language class....or something.
At 8:30:37 PM on 11/26/2004, conor said:
ENOUGH, Big M, enough.
At 12:28:02 PM on 11/26/2004, BigM said:
Made a mistake,never ask a taliban about atombombs!
you only get trouble!!
BigM
At 2:52:51 PM on 11/25/2004, Rick said:
My God, I'd forgotten... why I never read the news page comments. 0_o
-Rick
At 2:32:34 PM on 11/25/2004, Jaab said:
U2 is the best driveshaft!
uno, dos, trčs, quatorze!!!
At 2:04:48 PM on 11/25/2004, BigM said:
Ask the idiots of the Taliban!
BigM
At 8:30:32 PM on 11/24/2004, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
Does anybody know how to dismantle an atomic bomb?!?!
At 11:28:02 AM on 11/24/2004, BigM said:
Hmpf, the only thing i was to let people now is that: JP4 has GOT to be BETTER than JP3 at some points!!
BigM
At 10:57:19 AM on 11/23/2004, raptor2000 said:
Will you shut up about Jurassic Park 3 already? We are talking about JP4 and Star Wars Episode III...we are dont with the "JP3 shoulda been longer" conversation.
At 3:58:57 AM on 11/23/2004, BigM said:
JP3 was to short!! Its a great movie!! But after the Spino T-Rex fight was the exciting a level lower. A bit of more dino fights in JP4 will be an great variety.
With a running time of 2hrs at minimum will be great!
And i hope that the sound on DVD will be just as good as Starwars and L.O.T.R
BigM
At 3:29:14 AM on 11/23/2004, mrprongs said:
It's been 2.5 months. How long is almost complete to Stan anyway?
At 3:01:04 PM on 11/22/2004, krazykid3001 said:
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzz
At 2:42:48 PM on 11/21/2004, raptor2000 said:
Excuse me, CHAOTICIAN. :-P
At 2:42:08 PM on 11/21/2004, raptor2000 said:
That was going to be my argument. Malcom was not an expert in dinosaurs or even animals in general. He was a mathematician.
At 1:49:21 AM on 11/20/2004, mrprongs said:
Well, let's see how smart you are after a T-rex seriously injures you to the point of nonescape. Fear rising, blood loss, possible infection. I'm sure you'd try any half baked scheme to protect yourself from another attack. Since meat eaters don't like plants, covering yourself up hides you from sight and smell. You'r enot going to be thinking about a dino's nose. Especially if you're not a paleotonlogist.
At 11:26:12 PM on 11/19/2004, DarthRex said:
Yeah, he WAS kinda stupid for a genius...
At 3:36:29 AM on 11/19/2004, mrprongs said:
But did Malcolm know that?
At 8:39:18 PM on 11/18/2004, raptor2000 said:
I doubt a leaf is going to block the scent from a creature with such a powerful sense of smell.
At 4:16:38 AM on 11/18/2004, mrprongs said:
He was probably masking his scent.
At 3:08:16 PM on 11/17/2004, Jaab said:
Just saw JP1 again and noticed something I never did notice before. When Ian is being chased by the Rex, just before Donald gets eaten, he falls and is burried under leaves. Later when he's found by Ellie he's still burried, but he has put on a tourniquet. So the thing I never noticed before is that he must have re-burried himself under the leaves. That's my guess anyway. Funny character Ian is.
At 7:26:36 PM on 11/16/2004, raptor2000 said:
The lines mustve not been as long as when I was there. :-P
At 6:12:56 PM on 11/16/2004, Pazz Kat said:
I agree, if youy can make it, the movie, good for its length, good! Keep it. But, if you have a few good moments, then the rest of the movie loses the audience, what's the point, you're just gunna end up losing a ton of money.. But then, movies with sequels, have fans..like us, who froth at it nothing to get stuff with the movie's name in it. Everytime I go to Universal Studios Hollywood, I always break away from my family and go single rider JP, awed at it, everytime, as if it were the real thing, and I was just seeing it.... this past time I went 20-30 times in a day. ^_^;
At 10:59:07 AM on 11/16/2004, raptor2000 said:
If the movies gonna be crappy yet they are going to make it anyway, I'd rather it be short. If it's going to be good for its entire running time, then it can be longer.
At 10:58:15 AM on 11/16/2004, raptor2000 said:
We all know how long JP3 was....why are you so obsessed with the problems with JP3?
At 7:11:54 AM on 11/16/2004, BigM said:
I hope JP4's playtime will be longer than JP3!! That was a quiky, with a play time of 1hr and 30 minutes!!
BigM
At 3:44:21 PM on 11/15/2004, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
I stand corrected.
But Anakin's still a whore.
Just kidding!
At 11:04:46 PM on 11/14/2004, raptor2000 said:
lol.
dont look for jango's head cuz you wont see it. Right after Mace Windu cuts his head off and you see his helmet bounce away, if you watch closely you'll see not one but 2 shadows falling away.
go to this link, it should answer your question.
http://www.starwars.com/community/askjc/jocasta/askjc20020820.html
At 8:05:05 PM on 11/14/2004, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
I lied, it's www.dvdanswers.com
My fault.
At 8:03:19 PM on 11/14/2004, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
I'll have to look for Jango's head next time I watch Episode II. And I know Anakin's not a whore, even though the acting skills weren't that great.
After seeing the elaborate tracking of changes to the Original Trilogy on dvdnews.com, I must agree with you that I like the Special Editions better, though some things (like Jabba) are mistakes and even though they help make us understand more about the movies, sometimes lines need to be drawn, and Lucas refuses to draw any.
And I do know that Episode I was in pre-production when the Special Editions came out, I was really just being a dick and trying to justify my reasoning.
[Over]
At 6:37:50 PM on 11/14/2004, raptor2000 said:
Episode I was already in pre-production at the time the Special Editions came out. All special edition was in reality was getting people back into Star Wars so they would be pumped in 1999 when TPM came out. He's done something like that before and after every prequel.
Before Episode I - Special Edition trilogy in theaters and on VHS
After Episode I/Before Episode II - Episode I on VHS, original trilogy on VHS again in new box, Episode I on DVD (it came out much later than the VHS)
After Episode II/Before Episode III - Episode II on VHS and DVD, original trilogy on DVD, Ewok movies on DVD, Ewok show on DVD, Droids show on DVD
Regardless though, I still like the special edition better than the original.
And as for what you said....Anakin is not a whore, he just cant act....and Jango's head does fall out of the helmet. Notice when it falls to the ground there is a second shadow seen falling away from the shadow of the helmet. Think about it: the helmet was made to slip easily on and off his head, not to hold on to it.
At 4:28:07 PM on 11/14/2004, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
Yeah I was about to say I thought he went crazy in about 1995 when he got this wacky idea about the Special Editions and decided why not stop there? Let's make Episode I: Anakin's a whore, and Episode II: Jango Fett's head doesn't fall out.
I like the movies but agree that Lucas has lost his edge.
But I'm still hopeful that this last one will be what we've all searched for before Episode I came out.
At 2:15:26 PM on 11/14/2004, raptor2000 said:
>>It would be kinda cool if George went crazy with this film. Oh well, distant dream. Anyways, chao!<<
I think thats what he's done on the past 2 movies and thats why they sucked. Well...I can't say that, cuz I do like the Phantom Menace. But still, he went crazy with these 2, while the original 3 were structured and organized (and werent 99% CGI) which is why they are so good.
He needs to re-examine what he did right with the originals and do that again...not that it matters, they are already putting finishing touches on Episode III.
At 12:42:30 PM on 11/13/2004, Jaab said:
Maybe a url comes in handy when making a request like that :)
www.the-outburst.nl
At 12:43:58 AM on 11/13/2004, Pazz Kat said:
Don't remind me that little kids were attracted to JP even with a PG-13 logo. I remember, when I was four or five, or however old, I got sooooo scared at the kitchen scene, I ended up burying my head in my dads arm for the duration of the scene. He always told me "Count 1,2,3, and the scary part will be over, LIES!!! Everytime I looked it was a raptor going crazy on the kids. ~_~ Anyways, about episode three, I dunno if I'll see it. I mean, the last episode was just....dumb. He totally lost me, although I did beleive the StormTroopers were awesome. People are getting tired of movie after movie after movie (In a series, trilogy, w/e) good proof of that was Seed of Chucky which, someone said "See of Chuck was...it was...Incredibles was better." =P As for the rating....be prepared to have moms storm the theaters with pitch forks and torches, demanding the rating be upped to PG-13. Lucas has a lot of money, and if he still has the 'moves' then the rating will be PG. It would be kinda cool if George went crazy with this film. Oh well, distant dream. Anyways, chao!
At 2:33:30 PM on 11/12/2004, Jaab said:
Not JP related, but I just finished (at least kinda) the site for my band "the Outburst". Maybe someone wants to give his opinion on how it looks?
At 11:48:51 AM on 11/12/2004, raptor2000 said:
Wrath of Khan is the best Star Trek movie there is.
As for Darth Maul and Qui-gon...well that wasnt too bad. No blood or anything. Sept for that red "haze" when Obi-wan cuts Darth Maul in half.
And in Episode 2, I only recall one beheading (which, again, was not bloody) and I dont remember any dismembering...
If A New Hope could have an arm cut off and shown with a pool of blood and still get PG (despite ratings getting more loose since then) then Episode 3 should be able to have some of that stuff.
And again, I agree with mrprongs, PG-13 probably attacts a larger audience becuase little kids think its "cool" to see a "big kids movie"
At 4:34:13 AM on 11/12/2004, PorterM7Z said:
I think you're right, Drive. I'm pretty sure I've read too that Ol' Georgy is contractually obligated to deliver a PG rating on 'Everything's Fucked'. But I wouldn't fret: TPM featured some wicked lightsaber-torso action in the sense of Liam Neeson and Darthy McMaul getting sliced in half; and AotC had at least two decapitations and a nice dismembering. The key seems to be just don't show blood and try to keep it quick.... And sleep with someone in the MPAA- that's the big one.
I know my kiddie sports movie will have a hard time delivering a PG rating, but it has to because it's supposed to be a kids movie. There'll have to be an alternate 'Unrated' (cough-moderate PG-13-cough) edition on DVD because I really can't sacrifice all the better jokes forever.
On a side note, Ricardo Montalbon is the Man. And I've never even seen Wrath of Khan.
"Join the Die Hard Ric Olie Fan Club!
It's a CLUB!
For FANS of RIC OLIE!
Who are DIE HARD!"
At 3:41:38 AM on 11/12/2004, mrprongs said:
Jurassic Park was PG-13. And that sure didn't stop little kids from seeing it. We wouldn't be here today if it did. Actually, it seems to have enouraged kids to go see the cool older kid oriented dinos.
At 10:18:01 PM on 11/11/2004, raptor2000 said:
It needs to be PG-13 to make it good.
And I highly doubt the rating would lose any audience, unless it is R of course, which wont happen. Anyone can still see PG-13. Plus, Star Wars is popular enough people would still see it. In fact, a higher rating might even attrack more of an audience, as the older generation would be much more likely to see PG-13 than PG. Oh well, heres to hoping Revenge of the Sith is as good as 4, 5, and 6
At 7:18:36 PM on 11/11/2004, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
I don't know Raptor, I've heard rumors of someone having seen the rough cut and claiming that it's right behind Empire Strikes Back.
As far as redeeming movie, it needs to be for Lucas. There's no other choice, otherwise his semi-credibility will definitely collapse.
And the rating thing, someone raised a good point on theforce.net: if it were to get a PG-13 rating, some of the merchandise probably wouldn't be aimed towards kids...I could be wrong on this but it seems Lucas would lose a lot of money and deals if the film went PG-13, and knowing Lucas he wouldn't dare lose any money to his precious franchise. Who can blame him? But maybe he'll cut a deal with the MPAA and get a lower rating on it, which is the kind of bartering that Matt Parker and Trey Stone are going to sue the MPAA for (after this season wraps up on South Park).
Those guys have balls!
Anywho, I'm hoping Episode III will be PG-13, but maybe that's setting my hopes too high. Then again, who knows?
At 9:43:03 PM on 11/8/2004, raptor2000 said:
Supposedly Episode III will be better than the other 2 prequals....but I highly doubt it will be as good as any of the original trilogy.
At 8:55:41 PM on 11/8/2004, Pazz Kat said:
I dun think this says Dan's SW5 page.... but then again, I have been wrong. >_> Just to prove my point in the books (Which I consider to be more of the 'truth' then the movies, games, etc. The Costa Ricans (After being totally ticked off) napalm the whole island, which means the plants (if not all dinosaurs) die/perish/sleep eternally whatever you want to call it. No plants, no dinosaurs. Even if plants remained, they would lack the neccesary amount of plants (four to five hundred pounds per dinosaur) for a monthish or day, I can't remember the time amount, as stated in the book. If you want to discuss it with me, AIM me, same as my s/n here. Anyways, the third movie will be...eh. Star Wars is kinda...gone now. After the first two episodes came out, it just kinda spiraled. (I thought the Yoda fight was lame) but oh well. Chao you smelly ewoks.
At 12:22:05 PM on 11/7/2004, raptor2000 said:
well I watched both the entire movie and the deleted scenes....nope, no evidence to say Nublar is gone. but Driveshaft is right, we've debated this a hundred times and it always goes the same way, and frankly I'm tired of it. So let's all STFU and wait for JP4 to decide. We arent making the movies, our opinions mean nothing.
But anyway, I think the Episode III trailer was awsome too...then again, I thought the Episode II one was cool as well and it ended up kind of sucking. So in terms of Lucas' redeeming movie, I dunno, I think he's lost it, but he will have to actually try to make this movie worse than the last 2 for it to happen. If you think of all the loose ends from the prequels that arent in the original trilogy, plus all the new plot lines, characters, etc introduced in Episode 3 that arent in Episode 4, they have got a ton of stuff to pack into a 2 hour long movie. And from what I've seen, it's doubtful this movie will be able to get a PG like the other 5. I think we are looking at possibly the first PG-13 Star Wars movie. Which is fine by me. I think they need to add in that extra stuff(other than sex and language, which Star Wars does not need, nor will Lucas put it in.) that pushes it up to the next rating. It's supposed to be a dark movie....the death of all but 2 of the jedi, the corruption of Anakin/Vader, the rise of the Empire...they need to go for PG-13 to get the whole effect....and they might need to try to make the movie a little longer than the other 5....like go for LOTR:ROTK's length....3 hours should fit it all in enough that it doesnt feel too rushed.
At 5:58:19 AM on 11/7/2004, PorterM7Z said:
"The trailer is incredible!"
Punny stuff. Did you download it or did you go see Incredibles? Good movie, by the way. And, yeh, I'm looknig forward to Episode III aka 'RotS' aka 'Abolishment of the Jedi Amendment' aka 'Everything's Fucked' too. Is still being edged out in my mind by Serenity (barely). Just my puny geek brain processing the idea of Serenity makes me giddy.... and very very nervous. I really hope it's great. And that all our heroes remain in one piece.
At 7:03:48 PM on 11/6/2004, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
Isn't this the millionth time that we have debated this same exact topic? No really, I urge you to look in past posts, randomly pick one out of 5...I think that's how much we've debated this topic.
Speaking of smelly Ewoks, Episode III I think will be George Lucas' redeeming movie. The trailer is incredible!
At 5:55:11 AM on 11/6/2004, mrprongs said:
>And besides, I've watched >those scenes many times and >they never say the island >was destroyed.
So dismantleing the park, includeding the biological life forms, is not destroying them? So, they're in storage now?
Of course Malcolm was surprised there were live dinos still around. He knew they had no Lyscine and would all be re-extinct. He was not surprised more existed. More would give less of a shock. He'd be used to dinos still existing.
What movies were you watching?
And deleted or not, they're still a part of the continuity until evidence shows they cut to allow an alternate plot later on. Since TLW and JP3 all follow the Sorna only mindset such a deleting did not occur. It was cut for time or pacing. Watch them again. pay attention. You'll see they can't be on Nublar.
At 11:11:53 AM on 11/5/2004, raptor2000 said:
By the way, sorry to burst your bubble Dan, but I think its time to change your poll....sorry, your man lost.
At 11:09:46 AM on 11/5/2004, raptor2000 said:
Those scenes were DELETED.
And besides, I've watched those scenes many times and they never say the island was destroyed. They are talking about lost items that were left on the island and people who died there.
In TLW, Malcom is shocked because he now knows there are not one but two islands with dinosaurs now on them...double the dinos.
Anyway, I never did have an SNES, but I did and still do have a Sega Genesis and for it I have the original Jurassic Park game, Jurassic Park: Rampage Edition (which is actually a continuation of the original game), and The Lost World.
All 3 games are really fun...the 2 JP games are awesome sidescrollers and I still play them often cuz they are really fun....I like being the raptor so I can eat people :-P But being Grant is fun too. I like desentigrating compys, dilophosaurs, raptors, etc. with the shocker gun thing.
And the TLW game is fun too, especially with 2 players.
At 7:10:49 AM on 11/5/2004, mrprongs said:
Watch the TLW DVD deleted scenes, or a TV showing with the deleted scenes already included in their proper places for all your proof.
Also, watch JP 3, with the reaction to the fact that there's 2 islands. Because everybody knows of Sorna, the dino island. Very few outside of paleo circles and JP related fields knows there was 2 islands, a showroom and a factory.
Not to mention TLW's kept scenes at the beginning, where Hammond goes on excitedly about Site B. Because Site A's dinos are gone. Malcolm's overwhelming shock that dinos still live, not a second island with even more dinos still live. And as been pointed out before in several JP circles, the tag line Something has Survived means Nublar is dinoless.
Really, it's ridiculous to think Nublar still has dinos, considering everything we know of the set up, and watching TLW/JP3.
At 6:19:43 AM on 11/5/2004, PorterM7Z said:
Alas, I didn't get to play too many of the JP games very much: I remember playing the original Sega game, the NES game, and the PS1 Lost World game, but that's all. I do wanna get OG though.
In other news, I've now seen Seed of Chucky.... and Incredibles twice. Seed of Chucky was..... well.... it was..... Incredibles was really really great.
At 8:57:51 PM on 11/4/2004, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
Holy shit! Rex, that game was the best JP game ever! I remember playing it for hours, it had freaking awesome music and was as close to the JP Sega Genesis game there was (Rampage or something). JP Part 2: The Chaos Continues for SNES is well worth the time and money!
I fell in absolute love with that game and though OG was good, Chaos Continues is still my fave!
At 3:44:00 PM on 11/4/2004, krazykid3001 said:
I guess you don't know anything. Site B was made to make dinosaurs that went to Nubar. The reason why the dinos were free was because everyone ditched after what happened at the park.
At 11:00:25 AM on 11/4/2004, raptor2000 said:
>>[ Post ] [ Log Out ] [ User Settings]
means the user
is online now!
At 3:16:02 AM on 11/4/2004, mrprongs said:
The video games are not the movies either. And Nublar was dismantled in the movies. It's dinoless, get over it. Thta's the whole reason Site B was created, to allow dinos to still be alive. And there's no Lyscine on Nublar. That's the whole point the dinos flourished on Sorna. It was a one shot deal.
<<
That's the point I was trying to make. None of the forms of JP - books, games, movies, etc - are necessarily connected. And yes, there is lysine on Nublar, thats how the herbivores survived, not just after they broke out, but while they were still in cages. Then the carnivores eat the lysine-rich herbivores and so on.
And if you give me any proof whatsoever from the movies that Nublar was dismantled or destroyed in the movies, I will believe you, but as of yet no one has been able to.
Btw, thanks for agreeing with me DarthRex...and no I don't seem to remember that game....might have to look on ebay or somethin.
At 3:16:02 AM on 11/4/2004, mrprongs said:
The video games are not the movies either. And Nublar was dismantled in the movies. It's dinoless, get over it. Thta's the whole reason Site B was created, to allow dinos to still be alive. And there's no Lyscine on Nublar. That's the whole point the dinos flourished on Sorna. It was a one shot deal.
At 12:05:40 AM on 11/4/2004, DarthRex said:
I agree with you Raptor2000. Do you remember the game JP2: the Chaos Continues? It was completely different from The Lost World. Alan Grant and some black dude came back to Isla Nublar. It was a pretty sweet side scroller. It even had some cool cut scenes (at the beginning anyway). It kinda reminded me of Contra. Anyway, the point was that I agree about the books not being movies. I also think that if Michael Crichton were to make JP3 into a novel, that it would be changed completely.
At 10:28:53 PM on 11/3/2004, Pazz Kat said:
I agree,Ewoks are too cute to be smelly anyways! =P But with the whole Nublar situation, some would survive surely, but the imbalance of the species....would not be happy for the poor starving dinosaurs. So....there would be no surviving species. (Although I wish) Nublar is a lost hope, so we would basically have to look at Sorna (They should have NEVER killed Muldoon in the movies) Sorry I keep ranting. Anyways, let's just hope the script cannot be even in the slightest way be related (except for dinos) to this one that we have now.
At 11:25:17 AM on 11/3/2004, raptor2000 said:
Ewoks probably smell just like the humans of Star Wars, or even better. Notice their fur is clean and free of sticks and junk. Chewbacca, that's another story.
And like I continue to say, with Jurassic Park, the books ARE NOT the movies. Yeah, Nublar was bombed at the end of the JP book...but then again, Hammond and Malcom were dead at the end, and Muldoon was alive. And the TLW book was nothing like the movie. So whatever happened in the book doesnt necessarily happen in the book. Nublar can and should come back. Not to mention, if you ever played the Jurassic Park/The Lost World game Chaos Island, it shows that some of the dinosaurs on Nublar survived then reproduced.
But if this script is real (which it isnt) it doesnt look like we will see much if any of either island.
At 12:01:31 AM on 11/2/2004, Pazz Kat said:
Sorry for the double post but, why are we discussing what an ewok smells like? Whatever it does it smells moldy and what not because they never take baths (Do they bathe themselves?) Go find some trailer dude who doesn't work or bathe and then you'll have the smell.
At 11:56:40 PM on 11/1/2004, Pazz Kat said:
I've been kinda a watcher, reader, but now I'm getting into the forum spirit (Please shoot me.) But if he wrote a third book, it would HAVE to take place on Isla Sorna (For those of you who read the books you'd know why) But Isla Nubla gets nuked and Isla Sorna is the only other place with dinosaurs after blah blah blah... Anyways, it just wouldn't work out. I tried thinking of a plot for my game (StarCraft) there just seems to be none. ^___^;;; Anyways, this fourth movie seems...scary...from what I've heard....men training dinos to fight dinos, if you're going to reduce JP to that..just stop. =/ It will be interesting to see what happens (Did the site go down for like a week or two for any of you?)
At 12:57:47 PM on 10/31/2004, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
Porter, any chance you'll be stopping by Denver/Boulder?
You should, if you're not.
Otherwise doom on you!
You smelly ewok.
At 6:42:44 AM on 10/31/2004, PorterM7Z said:
Geez, I always assumed an Ewok would smell something like a wet dog.... but your description is much more in-depth. Good on you, sir!
In other news, I'm planning on a trip from LA to AZ at the end of the year with a few friends of mine.... So if any of you live in West or Central TX and would like to help supply lodging for a group of mild-mannered citizens for a night, let me know.
Oh and Hppy Halloween! Who'se dressing up? I'm going as Wash ala Firefly/Serenity.
"Join the Die Hard Ric Olie Fan Club!
It's a CLUB!
For FANS of RIC OLIE!
Who are DIE HARD!"
At 1:01:09 AM on 10/27/2004, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
I can only imagine that an ewok would smell like burnt dog hair (the way that it smells) with the combination of Dilophosaurus spittle from JP (I KNOW it's not accurate) and perhaps that aftertaste of root beer (or better yet beer) in your mouth when you burp. The one so bad it burns your nose hairs.
That, my friends, is what an Ewok smells like.
Or so I'm guessing.
At 12:03:23 AM on 10/27/2004, DarthRex said:
Like Ewok feces and Mynok spit...
and they taste like chicken. But what doesn't...
air... air... airplane food...
what's up with that...? Am... am I right...?
Am I right?
At 11:50:19 PM on 10/26/2004, PorterM7Z said:
Nothing wrong with smelling like an Ewok, Drive.... Wait, what does an Ewok smell like exactly?
At 8:18:53 AM on 10/26/2004, Genius said:
It appears Dan has left this board...
At 12:14:08 PM on 10/25/2004, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
Thanks for the status update, Dan. I figured maybe you didn't like me, or that I smell like an Ewok.
At 10:47:10 PM on 10/24/2004, DarthRex said:
Congradulations.
At 3:44:10 PM on 10/22/2004, Dan said:
Several people sent me the link to the Nature article in question. However I talked directly to the guy quoted in that article, who said that his comments were just speculation based on some of the dinos in JP3. He is not a member of the crew or a consultant.
-Dan
At 8:28:51 PM on 10/17/2004, raptor2000 said:
I'd say it's bullshit.
At 12:16:27 PM on 10/15/2004, Driveshaft 2.0 said:
Did anyone else see the news posting on Dark Horizons that someone has seen the completed first few shots of the film and that the dinosaurs definitely now have feathers?
I sent this info to Dan, but I'm shocked to hear of this news, considering that I don't think there's even been a PRESS RELEASE for JP IV has there?
Or am I, dare I say, driving the wrong way??
At 7:10:01 AM on 10/15/2004, DarthRex said:
I figured as much Porter. The only reason I'd see Taxi is to see Gisele Budchen. And, Yes, I must whole heartedly agree that Shaun of the Dead is worth Multiple times. I even downloaded it off Shareaza. On A 56K. That's how much it ruled. Zombie movies are fun. By the way... how are your movies coming along? I've been busy so I haven't gotten around to any Dinos IN SPAAAAACE Fan art lately... but as soon as I get some I'll send it to ya.
At 4:50:50 PM on 10/13/2004, raptor2000 said:
But he's not going to write them, so there is no point in griping about it. Not only will he never write another Jurassic Park book, but it looks like he won't be writing much more at all.
By the way, The Lost World is the only sequel he has ever written.
At 7:33:43 AM on 10/13/2004, BigM said:
Just what Mr.Darth Rex said: Once upon a time,
If Michael Crichton wrote Jurassic Park 3 and 4 I would be happy.
The End.
Big M
At 12:41:39 AM on 10/13/2004, PorterM7Z said:
Afraid to pay for a movie you think might blow? That's what I'm here for! Huzzah!
Movies worth seeing right now-
1. Shaun of the Dead (multiple times)
2. Team America: World Police
3. Garden State
4. Ladder 49
Movies worth avoiding like the plague they are-
1. Taxi starring Jimmy Fallon
2. Taxi starring Queen Latifah
3. Taxi directed by Tim Story
At 4:34:43 PM on 10/12/2004, raptor2000 said:
Thats true....ticket prices are so high nowadays that I dont want to pay to go see it unless I know its good.....problem is, the critics will say a movie is bad when it's really good, and visa versa.
At 12:31:04 AM on 10/12/2004, DarthRex said:
Yeah that too. Well, I'm sure that a third novel wouldn't be as dissappointing as the third movie... but that's just me. And to go along with that, I'm also pretty sure, raptor2000, that I don't wanna see anymore novels unless they're "Good". But I'm not always so sure that we all feel the same way about the movies though. I don't wanna see JP4 (in theaters that is) if it's gonna blow... know what I mean? Why should I spend $8.00 to watch a movie that's script belongs to a movie that barely deserves to be on the sci-fi channel?
At 8:34:19 PM on 10/10/2004, raptor2000 said:
If he wrote them and they were GOOD, then I'd be happy.
At 8:04:50 PM on 10/10/2004, DarthRex said:
Once upon a time,
If Michael Crichton wrote Jurassic Park 3 and 4 I would be happy.
The End.
At 2:32:51 PM on 9/25/2004, krazykid3001 said:
Because he's smart enough to relize you can't just change the end of the book so half the people get one and the other half get another, that's lame.
PLus maybe he wanted to fill in more of the holes about the animals on the mainland, and had an idea for the third book that was 100 pages but he wanted more. I don't know it was just a rumour years ago.
At 9:18:51 PM on 9/23/2004, raptor2000 said:
>>At 6:52:21 PM on 9/23/2004, conor said:
BigM, WHAT are you talking about? i dont know anyone who understood that post.<<
I agree.
I say again, take an English class BigM. A good one.
And yeah...he wrote the book, how could he not end it the way he wanted to? And if he came up with a new idea after it had been published, he wouldnt have written an entirely new book just to have that new ending, he just would have rereleased the original with the new end put in.
And I personally thought the TLW book was pretty good. Not as good as the JP movie/book, but infinately better than the TLW movie.
Pansy Ian Malcom goes and gets himself incapacitated....again....andgets high on morphine.....again, in the TLW book...just like in JP.
At 6:52:21 PM on 9/23/2004, conor said:
BigM, WHAT are you talking about? i dont know anyone who understood that post.
At 4:44:10 PM on 9/23/2004, krazykid3001 said:
Yes it is a rumour, I don't remeber hearing it, but I thought he said after the boook came out he thought of a better ending for the series and was going to write a 3rd book. Oh well the 2nd book wasn't that great anyways.
At 8:16:56 AM on 9/23/2004, BigM said:
I remember a rumour that he wrote 7 JP books!!But it where only 2.So it is a real rumour now!! He only has written 2 books, so isn't it also a rumour that he didn't let end the book like he would?
BigM.
At 5:36:50 AM on 9/23/2004, mrprongs said:
He wrote the book. How could it not end the way he wanted it too?
At 10:45:38 PM on 9/22/2004, raptor2000 said:
>>At 9:12:02 PM on 9/22/2004, krazykid3001 said:
Didn't he say that JP-The Lost World book didn't end the way he wanted and that he was going to write a third book? Whatever happened to that?<<
I dont recall that....but if he did, I suppose it never happened. :-P
At 9:22:22 PM on 9/22/2004, krazykid3001 said:
My new song...
Teenage Mutant Ninja Dinos… Teenage Mutant Ninja Dinos… Teenage Mutant Ninja Dinos… Heros in a lame ass movie, Dino Power!
At 9:12:02 PM on 9/22/2004, krazykid3001 said:
Didn't he say that JP-The Lost World book didn't end the way he wanted and that he was going to write a third book? Whatever happened to that?
At 5:25:06 PM on 9/22/2004, raptor2000 said:
I think everyone hopes that.
At 12:59:24 PM on 9/22/2004, BigM said:
Thanks PorterM7Z english is not my first language.
And i now that JP3 was not based on a book of Chrichton.
But i realy hope that JP4 will be better than the rumours say!!
BigM.
At 10:27:09 PM on 9/21/2004, raptor2000 said:
Well Yeah I can agree with that. However, he said that there was a part never filmed for JP3 that was going to be used in JP4....which made no sense.
And he also said JP 1, 2, and 3 were based off books....well I guess thats true since 3 is kind of combinations of deleted book stuff from 1 and 2....but he still thinks there is a book out there by Michael Crichton called Jurassic Park 3....and there isnt.
At 7:53:43 PM on 9/21/2004, krazykid3001 said:
I think he means that parts of JP3 were found in parts of the JP books.
At 10:44:29 AM on 9/21/2004, PorterM7Z said:
Technically, JP3 wasn't based on a book, BigM, but I guesss you could say they still lifted bits from the first book.
And raptor, I think it's fairly obvious to all of us here that BigM's first language isn't English. I've never thought he sounded retarded: If he did, he'd have to use expressions like "LOL" and "u r gay!!11!" and "Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2003 is the best movie ever and it actually happened!"
.... Sorry. I've been on the IMDb boards too much recently.
"Join the DIE HARD RIC OLIE FAN CLUB!
It's a CLUB!
For FANS of RIC OLIE!
Who are DIE HARD!"
At 8:11:28 AM on 9/21/2004, BigM said:
There was a piece they filmed but didn't fit in the movie(JP3)and they mabey use it in JP4.Thats a rumour perhaps but a rumour that exists!And if the movie is gonna be like they said(the militairy shit)Than the movie is gonna suck!!JP1,2,3 was based on some thing(book) but a militairy Dino? Come on thats just like the cartoon Dino Raiders.It is an idea almost based on the cartoon Dino Raiders! So damn that movie because that script sucks!! And the movie will completely flop!!
BigM.
At 8:29:29 PM on 9/20/2004, the village said:
this movie is gonna suck sooooo much
At 11:55:50 AM on 9/12/2004, raptor2000 said:
Learn to speak English better, BigM. Cuz if I didnt know you were foreign and could barely speak English, I'd think you were retarded.
And if the piece was never recorder for JP3, how could it be used for JP4. And I've never heard that rumour before.
At 3:19:31 AM on 9/12/2004, BigM said:
So there is a piece never been recorded for JP3 and will be used in JP4 they said?
And a soldier who's training Dino's? Lets go Dino Raiders!!(stupid idea!!)
And whats the rol of the Spinosaurus and T-rex or will we not see them this time? If its so:Damn that movie!!
BigM.
At 4:47:39 PM on 9/9/2004, raptor2000 said:
>>At 9:47:55 PM on 9/8/2004, Dan said:
Plus Moriarty never said that the script he reviewed was final.. It's quite possible he got an older copy and changes are still being made. I don't have to remind anyone that the JP3 script was being changed up to and during filming. :)
-Dan<<
Good point. JP3s script was still being revised even after filming had already started......and you can tell.
Its suprising but alot of sequels start out with crappy scripts that get revised so many times into the final copy that you can hardly tell it is related to the original. By the time JP4 gets done with script revisions (if this one is even a true script) Im willing to bet the final script will hold little to no resemblence to this one.
At 3:08:16 PM on 9/9/2004, juniorxxx said:
ANYWAY stan winston's puppets are MUCH BETTER than the snakes from ANACONDAS :THFTBO
---------------------------
my good we barely couldnt see snakes in the movie , and when we see them, they are like gelly....
At 2:23:18 PM on 9/9/2004, Varan101 said:
You know I think its time someone informed Stan Winston that his animatronic effects are out of date these days. Quite frankly the way they were blended with CGI in Jurassic Park III was awful.
At 3:39:57 AM on 9/9/2004, mrprongs said:
> I don't have to remind >anyone that the JP3 script >was being changed up to and >during filming. :)
JP3 had a script while filming? Really?
I still like that Judas Strain idea. I'll even tolerate the ban on amber. But that's it. I refuse to believe they'll have another Nick, when there's still every other name possible to pick from. And the rest of the script: Riiight!
You know, it sounds like a fan made short, like they do for Star Wars, only, not cool, like Troopers was.
At 12:04:58 AM on 9/9/2004, Oviraptor said:
Yeah the guy at Spielberg films said he remembered hearing the answer Winston gave but not the question that was asked
At 10:11:14 PM on 9/8/2004, JP4me said:
The JP4 comment did happen, it was after the forum was over and the question was yelled quickly from the audience and he quickly answered it. But keep in mind, just because Winston says the script is a few weeks out doesnt mean that Spielberg hasn't seen it yet. Its possible Spielberg is ordering re-writes of it before he gives it over to Stan and the rest of the crew.
At 9:47:55 PM on 9/8/2004, Dan said:
Plus Moriarty never said that the script he reviewed was final.. It's quite possible he got an older copy and changes are still being made. I don't have to remind anyone that the JP3 script was being changed up to and during filming. :)
-Dan
At 7:41:48 PM on 9/8/2004, raptor2000 said:
Wow. Read between the lines. No one said anything about the review being made up. What we have said is that the SCRIPT is bullshit, and that they reviewed it, believing it to be real. An easy mistake, without really thinking about how improbable it is that among other things, Spielberg...or any respectable director/producer for that matter, would endorse a script of that poor quality.
At 7:08:51 PM on 9/8/2004, JPLuNaTiC said:
"It's not AICN, despite JPL's love interest in the site owner's, DOES post fake news and reviews."
None of the staff have ever made up a review. Period. If you want to refute that, then give me a link; we all know I proved my point awhile ago, and until you have something to back your's up then please stop dropping my sole fucking name around! EvilGrinch and Host also happen to be among the other "rare" members, or as I like to refer to them, non-ignoramuses.
At 6:58:25 PM on 9/8/2004, raptor2000 said:
Wait a second now.
I thought we KNEW that bullshit script from a few weeks ago was the final script and that it was finished.
I dont care how reliable you thing a person or group is, everyone is bound to post something false, either on purpose or by accident, at some point, and I still stick to the strong belief that thats what happened on AICN, and that that script was fake and bullshit. Spielberg would not endorse something like that.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, you cant believe any JP (or any other) rumours until you are sitting in that theater watching the movie.
Heck, Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith is almost completely done, and fan sites such as TheForce.net are STILL getting fake rumours. If that movie is so close and is still getting tons of bullshit, think about how many bullshit rumours, scripts, and whatever a movie that hasnt even been greenlit yet will be getting.
At 6:28:12 PM on 9/8/2004, rodkeys said:
The question about JP4 DID hapen. The guy who made the rewiew had listened just to the answer of Stan Winston: "It's just a few weeks away". He already apologized on Spielberg Films JP Forum.
At 6:16:35 PM on 9/8/2004, Aragorn said:
"So who says the Dino training thing is true btw?"
It's not AICN, despite JPL's love interest in the site owner's, DOES post fake news and reviews. They did for AvP as well as The Village as well as Daredevil, just to name 3. Then after they get exposed, they try to cover their tracks. The site is shit and pretty much everyone on this site knows that and has experianced such things from that site, first hand. But then you'll have the rare member that seems to think 40-odd people on one site alone, is all wrong.
Even though I enjoy the script review on some level and actualy really love the first half (With some revisions), I gurentee the script review is fake. He doesn't even state how he got the script. If the people at Universal are so hush hush about the project, why would they just give away a script to a huge site reviewer, to let the cat out of the bag like that? I'm sorry, but the script review IS fake. I bet my life on it.
At 4:54:56 PM on 9/8/2004, DarthMaulSithLord said:
So who says the Dino training thing is true btw?
I think Spielberg would be stupid to use such a concept.
At 2:33:53 PM on 9/8/2004, Aragorn said:
http://www.spielbergfilms.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1410
"He actually did go into a couple of new projects, but no mention of JP IV.
Okay, got back tonight from the screening and it was awesome. This film holds up amazingly well and the print we got was virtually flawless. No breaks, no scratches. It was like instant time travel back to 1993. Even Stan sat through the entire movie, after which he told us that there wasn't a single scene that he felt could be done better today. And I agree with him. As far as CG and mechanical effects have gone, no film made since JP surpasses the perfect blending of visual effects to give the audience convincingly REAL creatures.
He spent a good bit of time answering questions. This is a guy who loves the stage and wants to spend as much time on it as possible. He would have kept going if the moderators hadn't stopped him. And I would have gladly sat through every minute of it.
He had a couple of old stories to tell and a couple I'd not heard before. He also talked a little about an upcoming pet project he's working on. He gave us the title, Me And My Monster, and said it would break ground in creature fx. But he wouldn't give us any story details, which is just as well.
All in all well worth the price of admission and then some."
At 2:31:54 PM on 9/8/2004, Aragorn said:
This is false. There have already been a couple professional reviews done up for this, and they have all said that there was no mention of JP4 AT ALL. Look at the review Ovi posted on the MB.
At 1:08:10 PM on 9/8/2004, Amber said:
oh goodness, i sure hope your right malcolm.
At 11:52:58 AM on 9/8/2004, Malcolm said:
Like I've said many times: that "script review" done by AICN was total bull shit.
Now soon Universal should be releasing REAL information about this project.
At 11:13:25 AM on 9/8/2004, JP4me said:
I'm Nate! I've been sending news bits to Dan for a few years and I am a huge fan of the JP Series. I moved out here to California in hopes to work on a JP movie because it is the first movie to inspire me and I would like to bring the same feeling of magic to others. So if anyone knows of someone on the JP Production Team looking for more help please let me know! JP3me@aol.com -Nate
At 7:59:24 AM on 9/8/2004, Dac said:
1. OK, good, we need to see about finding a copy
2. Who's Nate?
Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment
|
|
Add DJP3P to your newsreader!
|
