|
|
[ Log In ] [ Register ]
 means the user is online now!
Unlike you I know what I am talking about.
At 4:32:51 PM on 9/15/2002, jp-freak said:
and i care what u think WHY???
At 4:38:35 PM on 9/14/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Best Lightsaver fights in Star Wars
1. Yoda vs Dooku (Attack of the Clones)
2. Luke vs Vader (The Empire Strikes Back)
3. Quigon and Obiwan vs Maul (The Phantom Menace)
4. Anikan and Obi Wan vs Tyrnass (Attack of the Clones
5. Luke vs Vader (Return of the Jedi)
At 3:49:56 PM on 9/14/2002, jp-freak said:
And for the record... Jimmy's a dumbass. Just had to throw that in...
I agree TOTALLY.Yoda fight best LOL!!!I LAUGHED MY ASS OFF!!! TFM had the best Lightsaber fight 10 times over AOTC
At 2:40:33 PM on 9/9/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Yoda fight was the best lightsaver fight in the Star Wars series.
At 8:34:55 PM on 9/8/2002, Nick Van Owen said:
There was one scene in JP where I couldn't tell the dinos were CGI - When the T-rex is eating the tire of the explorer.
As for Attack of the Clones, although I knew what was CGI and what was not, Zam in Clawdite form and Yoda were the only ones that looked fake to me.
And for the record... I... enjoyed, yes that's it, TPM more but thought AOTC was a better movie...
TPM's Saber Duel - Best Duel Ever
And for the record... Jimmy's a dumbass. Just had to throw that in...
At 2:15:53 PM on 9/8/2002, jp-freak said:
and how the hell did the clones look like Dinosaurs?not enough Jar Jar?LOL!Yoda with three ears?thats just fucking gay.
At 2:13:14 PM on 9/8/2002, jp-freak said:
Just ignore him,there used to be a guy named mega-rex but then this guy used his name and he wont stop using his name.i would know.i wuz mega-rex.stupid name copying guy
At 12:25:26 PM on 9/8/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Man Mega Rex you are such an idiot. I have heard some crazy arguments against Attack of the Clones but this really bad.
At 11:31:34 AM on 9/8/2002, Oviraptor said:
Not enough Jar Jar? LOL!
At 1:14:43 AM on 9/8/2002, raptor2000 said:
who are you and what are you smoking
At 8:56:25 PM on 9/7/2002, mega rex said:
Reasons why AOTC sucked
1. Not enough Jar Jar
2. The Clones looked like dinosuars
3. Natalie Portman was ugly
4. Yoda should have had three ears instead of two.
5. Anikan should have been a Gun gun
6. Padme should have had a prostitute.
So in conculsion Attack of the Clones sucked. It was almost as bad as The Empire Strikes Back.
At 3:22:06 PM on 9/7/2002, jp-freak said:
Yeah AOTC wuz just SOOOOOO much better than JP.u just cant addmit most other movies were better than AOTC.yes i am obsesed with jp but hell, this is a jp site dumbass.ok, u wanna talk about SW fine then.i dont like any of the Star Wars movies that much and ill leave it at that.i dont even know why im arguing with u about what SW movie was worst or best or whatever.i dont even like SW!!
P.S Jurassic Park isnt an action movie, its a Science Fiction movie dumbass.BTW its the number 1 science fiction movie for making the most money.
P.P.S Jimmy dont start arguing about how u think AOTC is better than JP ok?
At 12:57:28 PM on 9/7/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
First of Mega Rex is just trying to dissagree with me. He always will. He will hate me forever. Jp freak you just are so obsesed with Jurassic Park you can't admit there are better action movies.
At 7:54:35 PM on 9/6/2002, jp-freak said:
she aint ugly mega rex.and jimmy u dilwad,im saying what i think.im not saying its crappy.im saying in my opinion its a piece of shit movie that licks monkey balls and makes star wars look bad.
P.S Jimmy if u EVER say the CGI in AOTC wuz better than the CGI in any of the JP movies again i will insult u soooo much your life on this site will become a living HELL!!
At 3:46:38 PM on 9/6/2002, Oviraptor said:
You're nuts.
At 9:30:41 PM on 9/4/2002, mega rex said:
Natalie Portman is ugly.
At 6:25:28 PM on 9/4/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Check all the reviews go to Amazon and read all of the consumer reviews. Though many are negative virtualy all of them prefer Attack of the Clones to the Phantom Menace. One of the reviews is mine. Just find out that you are the only one who thinks that Attack of the Clones is better then The Phantom Menace.
At 7:49:34 PM on 9/3/2002, jp-freak said:
A New Hope
The Empire Strikes Back
Return Of The Jedi
and the rest r shit
P.S i would check the reviews but u know....im lazy
P.P.S u think the SW movies had better CGI then the JP movies?!r u fucking crazy?!ur a nutcase if u think that!!Everyone i have ever talked 2 in real life Hated AOTC!better than JP my ass. Jimmy, for once in your sorry life u actually pissed me off!!if u like AOTC soooo much go to a AOTC chat instead of dans jp3page u cum guzzling dick ramming bisectual shit eating prick!
At 6:58:07 PM on 9/3/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
First of all the CGI was much better then any of the Jurassic Park films. I didn't know that the clone troopers were CGI while I was watching it. The Best Star Wars in order
Attack of the Clones
A New Hope
The Empire Strikes Back
The Phantom Menace
Return of the Jedi
By the way you have to be the only person alive who likes The Phantom Menace more then Attack of the Clones. Read all of the reviews and find out I am right about this.
At 5:38:07 PM on 9/3/2002, jp-freak said:
TFM=TPM=The Phantom Menace
little mix up again
At 5:36:37 PM on 9/3/2002, jp-freak said:
Jimmy, whenever 1 person agrees with u on something u say most peole agree with u.thats just fucking queer.The graphics were 1/5 as good as jp's and the acting wuz just plain crappy.the story made no scence and most people i talked to hated AOTC.for gods sakes it wuz funny when Yoda got in that fight.i laughed my ass off!I didn't much care for TFM but compared to AOTC TFM rocked!the older SW movies were better.Jimmy, u just like AOTC better cuz its newer.u dont appretiate classic movies like Star Wars, Jaws or Jurassic Park 1.u just like everything shiney and new.
P.S i'v seen hotter than Amidala
At 2:42:18 PM on 9/2/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
It definutly was
At 11:55:10 AM on 9/2/2002, Oviraptor said:
AOTC is the best SW's film ever!
At 8:06:01 PM on 9/1/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Most people agree with me the Attack of the Clones is better then the Phantom Menace. Here is my rating.
Graphics - great
Story - Very good
acting - OK
Action - Absolutly awsome
Girl - Major Hottie
Lines - OK
All - Best movie Ever.
At 5:31:27 PM on 9/1/2002, jp-freak said:
AOTC worst SW movie EVER!!
Graphics=poor
story=very poor
acting=very poor
Girl=OK
Lines=poor
all=poor movie
At 11:45:37 AM on 9/1/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
The end battle was absolutly amazing. There is nothing I would have changed. That end battle is cinema genious. George Lucas is and awsome director. It had a plot that is explaining the original trilogy. It was the perfect way to set up the original trilogy. Its plot was dark, original, and well done.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/31/2002, underdog738 said:
hold on a moment. AOTC had a plot!? My god i couldn't tell, maybe because the acting and script dfrew me away from it or there was no plot at all. Just crap about protecting padme and figuring out clone crap, that is enought to fill 2 hours of film. More like 2 pages of a book. Leia was a grown woman u moron, the other girl was in her twenties or less.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/31/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
You can't judge a movie on acting. Attack of the Clones and better acting then The Phantom Menace and Return of the Jedi. As far as acting goes A New Hope is the best Star Wars movie. Everything else Attack of the Clones is best. Padme is much hot then Leia ever was. The effects are the best of them all. It is very dark and has a well paced plot. The action is so incredible. The end action sequence is the best action scene in the history of movies. It was awsome and amazing.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/31/2002, jp-freak said:
st=sw
sw=star wars
little mix up
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/31/2002, jp-freak said:
the 4 other st movies were much better.JP was just so much better than AOTC it wuz incredible.hell even jp2 wuz better than AOTC in my opinion.the acting wuz terrible, the lines sucked and the graphics were a bit cartoonish.face it Jimmy, u dont know what a good movie is
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/31/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
The acting was fine. Though some lines were corny most of the time Attack of the Clones acting was fine. It had several lines that forshadowed the original trilogy like:
"It is a good thing they didn't find plans for the ultimate weapon." the geonosian
"When I think of not being with you I can't breath" Anikan
"Clones are better then droids." alien creature
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/31/2002, underdog738 said:
Jimmy add this to ur list of what could of changed in aotc, BETTER ACTING! and it was a bit cartoonish and as for the person who posted before me. CGI Billy? You've got to tell me where it is because i did not even know there was one.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/30/2002, Darknodin said:
AOTC was good... but saying it's a masterpiece is stretching it a bit...
now... i got to say that I haven't seen Stuart Little but from whut i seen in the commercials, that lil rat is well done.
now who I think shoulda won (in a best CGI contest) any CGI character that you can't tell it's CGI at first glance...
1. The CGI Spino in the end of JP3 (in the dark) was incredible... but it was easy to tell in the daylight shots...
2.The CGI Billy was great... and I never woulda known if I hadn't listened to the commentary
3.A CGI Peter Park (in the beginning, when he climbs to go after Ben's killer). That one... even as I watch it now, i dun believe it's CGI
4.Anything in Final Fantasy... especially the bird in the end (if it's CGI... not certain at all)
5.the dragons in Dungeons and Dragons... THEY WAS THAA BEST~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/30/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
I am not a geek for loving Attack of the Clones it is awsome. Words can not describe how much of a masterpeice that movie is. Awsome action, great effects, a dark and well done plot, and an extremly hot girl in a main part. What else does a movie need.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/30/2002, jp-freak said:
graphics (cant believe i spelled it wrong 3 times
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/30/2002, jp-freak said:
graphic!
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/30/2002, jp-freak said:
ya well Jimmy's a geek.geeks do geeky things.im probably gonna get blasted for saying this but personaly i didn't like aotc that much.in my opinion the graohics looked to much like some sort of CGI cartoon.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/30/2002, underdog738 said:
That's pretty geeky.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/28/2002, jp-freak said:
think what u want
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/28/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
I loved the CGI Yoda. The way he fought was perfectly done and totally awsome. I am really glad Yoda won. I have seen Attack of the Clones 4 times and will buy the Widescreen DVD the day it comes out on November 12. November 12 can't come fast enough.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/28/2002, jp-freak said:
Scrappy wuz the bad guy?hes a good guy!thats just fuckin gay.anyway, Jimmy, lovable does not mean good graphics.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/28/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
This is most lovable poll not most revolutionary. If it was most revolutionary yes t-rex should have won. Most lovable is definutly Yoda. Yoda was awsome.
"Begun the Clone Wars have"
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/28/2002, Zap Madrigal said:
About the only thing funny in Scooby Doo the movie was the spoof Batman trailer. I have a 7 year old stepson and he has no interest in seeing it. If it aint appealing to kids - who the hell is seeing this pile of crap?
PS. Agree with what most people have said about CGI characters.
The 3 most groundbreaking where definitely The water tendril from the Abyss, The T-1000 and the T-Rex. Remember before these 3 (in tat order) the most spectacular CGI was in Star Trek the movie - which is laughable now.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/27/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Spoiler alert - Not only is Scrappy the villan but in the movie wierd looking monsters begin to steal peoples souls. The Scobby Doo movie is not funny and ruins the cartoon. The CGI is also very fake. I say the movie could not have worse. They are even making a sequal but can the world survive another Scobby Doo movie.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/27/2002, underdog738 said:
Damn, that is way off. Scraggy Doo or whatever is a pup in the cartoon so that is just really, really wrong!
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/26/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
The new Scooby Doo movie was nothing like the cartoon. Spoiler alert: The villan of the new movie was Scrappy Doo. He turns into a giant monster and trys to kill them. That really pissed me off.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/26/2002, jp-freak said:
what chat r u on?i guess most now means 3 or 4 people.in my opinion (key word opinion) the Tyrannosaurus wuz best. I still want to know wuz this a public vote though? I do understand how sum people might think Yoda wuz actualy best but in my opinion The T-rex wuz best.
P.S wuz Scooby Doo that damn bad? I never saw it but i want to know about this craptacular movie. From what i saw on the preivews it looked pretty shitty. Jimmy even though i havn't seen the movie from what i saw on the Preivews i tend to agree with u.
P.P.S STUART LITTLE?!what were they thinking?
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/26/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
1. Scooby Doo was one of the worst movies ever. It was so bad that I wanted to gak.
2. Thanks for telling me why Gandalf is still alive. I was really confused so I feel much better now that I know. I usualy am not a fan of spoilers but I really had to know. Thanks again.
3. Yoda was the best CGI charactor and most agree with me on this.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/26/2002, underdog738 said:
Remember people, its most lovable! I understand why Scooby mad it on and Stuart Little, t-rex was exactly the 'most lovable' as he wasn't a childs character, meaning he wasn't cute and cuddly etc. But i do agree t-rex should have gotten better than Yoda.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/25/2002, Nick Van Owen said:
Actually I love JP, why else would I be here? Have my SN named after a character from a JP movie? Hmmm?
Just because you like the T-rex more doesn't mean it's more realistic.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/25/2002, jp-freak said:
ok mr jp hater think what u want.in my opinion the T-rex wuz best by a country mile!The Yoda thing sucked ass.as far as im concerned the Rex wuz the best one there and therefor should have won.
P.S Scooby Doo?Stuart Little?what were they thinking?!
P.P.S wuz this thing a public vote?
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/25/2002, Nick Van Owen said:
Jimmy, the puppet Yoda looked more realistic because it was real. The CGI Yoda looked and acted cooler but he wasn't more realistic than te puppet.
"from what i saw the T-rex wuz best.The Yoda (no offence to Star Wars lovers) wuz to easy to tell it wuz CGI.the point of CGI is to make things look REAL.Jimmy get that through your dick licking head!Yoda wuz cool looking but it didn't look real.T-rex should have won no questions asked."
The T-rex is even easier to tell it's CGI. In my opinion as far as realism goes Yoda deserved it more than the T-rex. In Groundbreaking: T-rex. And I don't know which I'd choose for Favorite.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/24/2002, underdog738 said:
Jimmy if you want to know how Gandalf survived look below
****SPOILER****
While Gandalf and the Balrog fell the fought each other, after some time Gandalf got on top of the Balrog just as they landed in water at the bottom. The Balrog's flame was exstinguished and so they foughtt some more until the Blarog fled. Gandalf followed it and it led him to an exit.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/24/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
I made a typo sorry
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/24/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
I saw the trailer for The Two Towers I have never read the book so I was extremly confused on how Gandalf is alive. He fell off a cliff. I how they don't just say.
"He is a wizard so he lived"
That would suck I hope The Two Towers gives a good explaination on how Gandalf lives.
Plus the CGI Yoda is way more realistic then the puppet. The puppet was good for the early 80s but now we got the awsome new stuff
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/24/2002, underdog738 said:
Balrogs are cool, but i wouldn't put them on there.
I think Yoda looks even more fake in the new trilogy than he did in the old. A puppet does alot better job, Yoda was too fake.
PS: *****SPOILER****
In the TWO TOWERS of LOTR, many of you who have read the book would know Gandalf is alive. In the book it retells how Gandalf defeated the Balrog while he was falling from the bridge. Hopefully this will be included in the movie and we will see the Balrog once again.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/24/2002, pteranofan said:
That's true, the Pteranodon in TLW was EXTREMELY well done. I remember when I first saw it I thought,' wow that is terrific cgi.'
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/24/2002, jp-freak said:
Yoda looked fake as hell.cartoonish.The thing from The Abyss wuz good.what about the Pteranedon from jp2.u only saw it for a sec but it wuz done great
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/24/2002, pteranofan said:
It's a shame the water creature from 'The Abyss' didn't make it. It came before T-Rex and T-1000 and still looks cool today. This list obviously reflects public opinion and does not reflect how groundbreaking and amazing the effect was, otherwise the water creature, T-1000, and T-Rex would be at the top of that list, for sure.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/24/2002, mega rex said:
I think it should go to Jar Jar Binks. Thats what Mesa tinks.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/24/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Yoda rocks and was not at all fake. It looked and moved alot better then the puppet. Like I said the puppet Yoda can't fight.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/24/2002, jp-freak said:
from what i saw the T-rex wuz best.The Yoda (no offence to Star Wars lovers) wuz to easy to tell it wuz CGI.the point of CGI is to make things look REAL.Jimmy get that through your dick licking head!Yoda wuz cool looking but it didn't look real.T-rex should have won no questions asked.
P.S Jimmy why do u even post here?u dont seem to like JP all that much
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/24/2002, Nick Van Owen said:
I want a Balrog toy...
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/24/2002, Dan said:
I think the T-Rex should have won simply for the fact that it lead the way in CG creatures in films... ILM pioneered a lot of technology with JP, and without it, CGI Yoda would probably never have existed!
-Dan
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/24/2002, underdog738 said:
Did ANYBODY notice the 'most loved' title. Seriously who would love a Balrog toy staring at you while ur trying to sleep. Stuart Little is understandable as little kids and adults (jimmy) raved about him so it was only natural he would make it on.
Gollum deserves a spot definately and so do the raptors of JP3 and the t-rex. T-trex deserves 3 or 2.
(I in no way like Stuart Little and despise the little rat)
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/23/2002, Nick Van Owen said:
Jimmy, CGI is fake...
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/23/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
The CGI Yoda is fantastic. Just look at how much better he is then that puppet. I would love to just see if they tried to get the puppet Yoda to fight. It would be terrible. The CGI Yoda desreves top spot. It was in no way fake at all.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/23/2002, Nick Van Owen said:
You could tell the T-rex was fake at first site too...
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/23/2002, jp-freak said:
i saw those.the T-rex should have won.the Lord Of The Rings thing should have got second and the worm guys should have gotten 3.the jp raptors should have gotten in and gotten high too.in jp1 they tried to make the dinos look as much like real things as possible.Yoda did NOT deserve number 1.Yoda in AOTC wuz in my books pretty bad.u could tell it was computer animation at yer first look at it.
P.S I liked the Simone thing a lot.shes very hot even if she is a computer generated image
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/22/2002, Nick Van Owen said:
I saw them, pretty cool.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/22/2002, SeanArcher said:
Nick, I put those USC pictures up a while back.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/22/2002, Nick Van Owen said:
The Worm Guys kicked ass.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/22/2002, pteranofan said:
All I can say is if Stuart Little beat T-Rex, I would never read Entertainment Weekly again!
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/22/2002, raptor2000 said:
yes yoda did deserve it
gollum has a MUCH larger part in Parts 2 and 3 of LOTR if youve read the books, but for FOTR you never even got to see anything other than his face and hands
thank God the spinosaur didnt make it on that list, but the raptors i think deserved a spot
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/22/2002, Gamblers Ruined said:
Yoda did not deserve to be number 1 at all.
And the Worm guys? And Scooby Doo? WTF? What about Woody and Buzzlightyear, or the awesome CG characters in the (lame) movie Final Fantasy?
Also the Balrog shoulda kicked Gollum's arse.
But the thing that pissed me off was having Draco the Dragon in the Top 3 worst. EW sucks donkey balls.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/21/2002, underdog738 said:
Yeh, Gollum from LOTR was a bit cheap only have about 6 minutes of footage on him but in a away it makes sense but he was perhaps the most eagerly anticipated characer from LOTR to be seen in the movie.
Rex should have been about 3, 4 ish to me.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/21/2002, SeanArcher said:
Where is the list? I clicked on the link but a Simone thing came up.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/21/2002, Banning said:
I wouldn't even call that a people's choice list. While I agree all of those characers deservced to be on the list, the order didn't make sense. How could Gollum, a CG character VERY briefly seen in LOTR, be better then a dinosaur featured largly in two movies and another cameo in a third? While the T-1000 was good work, all it is is a liquid metal which forms itself against things. Come on, anything with actual skin and breaths with a pulse should be better than that!
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/21/2002, Pteranadon2003 said:
The Tyrannosaur should've been atleast #2. The Rex from Jurassic Park was the first computer generated Rex to have accually looked like a real animal. #5 my ass.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/21/2002, _jurassiraptor_ said:
Feh. "Meaningless" doesn't begin to describe this rank list.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/21/2002, Nick Van Owen said:
Yoda kicks all ass.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/21/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Number one went to Yoda from Attack of the Clones. Well done apparently I am not the only one who thought the CGI Yoda was awsome.
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/21/2002, Nick Van Owen said:
First! Haha remember those days...
Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment
|
|
Add DJP3P to your newsreader!
|
