|
|
[ Log In ] [ Register ]
 means the user is online now!
Happy Birthday and
FUCK YOU JIMMY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
At 2:43:48 PM on 9/13/2002, pteranofan said:
What the heck is that stuff that Isatari is typing?
At 9:42:30 PM on 9/7/2002, mega rex said:
Big as deal. This year was its 9th anivercery why is ten more special.
At 4:13:58 PM on 9/7/2002, jp-freak said:
JP's 10'th birthday dumbass
At 12:00:00 AM on 8/19/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Why is next year the year of Jurassic Park. I think 2005 would be since it is when Jurassic Park 4 comes out.
At 3:56:03 PM on 8/16/2002, Isatari said:
</font><font size=1 color=black><i><center>
At 3:59:59 AM on 8/9/2002, raptor7588 said:
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday to JP 3, happy birthday to you!
HAPPY B_DAY JP3!
At 3:56:01 PM on 8/3/2002, Ormau said:
Happy Birthday JP3
next Year is the JP year.
I´m so happy
At 10:11:14 PM on 7/30/2002, RaptorHiss said:
It's sad that an arguement breaks out on the anniversary:( I mean, it's a two sides fight, one saying "you fuck head bitch slut cunt, Jp3 ruled!", and the other side sayin g"you fuck head bitch slut cunt, Jp3 sucked!"
:(
At 12:22:25 PM on 7/29/2002, Mattman said:
I'm 23. I suddenly feel like an old fart.
At 2:54:20 PM on 7/28/2002, jp-freak said:
thanks man
At 7:51:12 PM on 7/27/2002, underdog738 said:
Im in Yr 8 and JP is for all ages and JP-FREAK it is ok for us to be here. Unless someones a 45 yr old slob who has nothing better to do but come to this site. But ur 12 and thats alright, so stuff everyone who gives u crap.
At 3:28:59 PM on 7/27/2002, jp-freak said:
does it really matter how old i am?jp is for all ages
At 3:28:09 PM on 7/27/2002, jp-freak said:
(sarcastic) funny!i am very offended
P.S im actually in 8'th grade
At 1:48:18 PM on 7/27/2002, bigoledork said:
I figured you were all 12. The atmosphere here is very 7th grade.
At 1:48:02 AM on 7/27/2002, underdog738 said:
JP freak thanks for that information. 12! I thought u were heaps older, and for the swearing...as kids go to High School (college, whatever the US calls it) kids will swear less. That's what happen in Australia.
At 4:16:43 PM on 7/26/2002, jp-freak said:
in my school grade 5s swear as much as me
At 3:05:55 PM on 7/26/2002, Raptor Strike said:
you're only 12?!? holy crap man... i thought you were older than that, since you swear so much on here.
At 2:50:48 PM on 7/26/2002, jp-freak said:
T-rex could probably run about 25 mph. thats my guess. but i do think that jp1,jp2 (not jp3) got the looks of the T-rex excelent.jp3's wuz terrible.i also think the t-rexes skin colour wuz ither brown,grey,black,red or a dark green.this is my guess but hell im only 12 so what would i know?i have studied dinos since i wuz a little kid and from what i have read and seen on tv t-rex could run about 25 mph.t-rex could not run 40 mph.thats probably about Allosaurus speed
At 12:12:06 PM on 7/26/2002, raptor2000 said:
yea an you are one
At 10:44:45 AM on 7/26/2002, the ARK said:
Swearing does not get anything done. People are fools to think that it does. The internet must have a lot of fools.
At 3:37:54 AM on 7/26/2002, underdog738 said:
Yeah, who were u guys agreeing with JP-FREAK or me. Hey im only 14 so tell me.
Anyhow i do no for a fact (after doing an assignment) that scientists can tell how fast a dino can run from looking at its bone structure and this what they said. "The t-rex' body was much too large to run at the speed of a car, only on short bursts. If it were to keep at a regular speed of 40kmh the dinosaur would trip and break the bones it its ribs and neck" Now for those of you who think this is absolute bull, dont blame me but its what i found on the net.
At 12:13:18 AM on 7/26/2002, Raptor Strike said:
i think that the scientists are guessing the dino colours by looking at modern day reptiles.
At 11:22:02 PM on 7/25/2002, raptor2000 said:
ok jimmy i want you to listen and repeat after me: Its a MOVIE. Its NOT REAL. It was made for your entertainment, not for you to stress how a freakin movie dinosaur runs to fast. Ok so the raptors were a little oversized, but they said in the making of JP, it was to make them scarier. they are not sayin thats their actual size. Its just a MOVIE. Now youre gonna tell me that Godzilla was too big in the movie, it wasnt scientifically possible for that fake movie monster to be that big. GET A LIFE JIMMY!!!
P.S. How the hell do scientists know how fast a dino ran by looking at its bones? for example: they say dinos skin was green or brown, when for all they know it was pink and purple! one more time, GET A LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
At 10:33:15 PM on 7/25/2002, Vinsfeld said:
yeah, i would hope trexes were strong enough to destroys a telephone poll and knock out someones call, but jimmy whats your point?
At 7:54:04 PM on 7/25/2002, Raptor Strike said:
to destroy a call??? wtf are you talking about?
At 5:56:43 PM on 7/25/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
For once I agree all three have huge faults but they are all still awsome. Even though I think the first is the worst of the trilogy I still love it. I do disagree about them being stronger and faster then they really were. Scientist say t-rex was actually strong enough to destroy a call with its teeth and the raptors were probably as fast as cheetahs.
At 3:52:21 PM on 7/25/2002, jp-freak said:
I agree TOTALLY!!!! Lets give him a round of applause.u have sum really good points so lets just stop fighting about what jp movie wuz the best and say all of them are good because they are.everyone has their own point of view.i like jp1 best.jimmy likes the other 2 better.so what?lets just agree their all good but they all had their faults.
At 5:44:00 AM on 7/25/2002, underdog738 said:
I no there are some HUGE faults in the JP series but i simply look at it as this and it lets me enjoy the movie without protesting out fake the something is or something or other.
The dinos, were faster and smarted than needed be and had extar features all in one reason that was perfectly described by Ellie and Grant. They were genetically modified anything could have happened, increased IQ etc becuase like Grant said "we have no idea how these creatures will react" we dont even no if they were like that and how they should behave. This works for me as it distracts me from rubbishy crap like the spino, t-rex fight which was nonetheless awesome to watch but a load of &*^%. This is just my idea of it, feel free to submit whatever u want.
At 12:43:32 AM on 7/25/2002, iiiiii said:
Hey guys, I don't mean to side with Jimmy, but he's right about bats. My second cousin works for the smithsonian, and he knows a shitload about bats. The majority of them have better eye sight than humans do, and echolocation is just to verify its location since light does play tricks.
At 11:24:37 PM on 7/24/2002, jmock5 said:
Trev, I was talking about how they looked not how they acted. The JP3 raptors were a bit too smart though.
At 7:29:32 PM on 7/24/2002, Trev said:
JP3's Raptors were over-done. They went on, and on about how 'smart' they were, when they were only in 4 or 5 scenes in the entire movie.
At 6:29:30 PM on 7/24/2002, jmock5 said:
Mattman, I couldn't agree more. The raptors in JP1 were too grayish. JP2's were better but still not as good as JP3's.
At 6:19:16 PM on 7/24/2002, Driveshaft said:
I agree that JP3 was total garbage, except for 1: Sam Neill (he is the man, JP3 or not), and 2: the spino T-rex fight (even though rex died). The original is still the best, and always will be.
At 4:19:06 PM on 7/24/2002, jp-freak said:
jp2 t-rex could not go into the bridge on the boat, eat everybody and go back into the cargo place where he wuz being stored before he attacked the bridge.also,there would be sum wreckage in the bridge.all u saw were body parts,how the hell did the rex get in the bridge without destroying anything?In jp3 the spino wuz made out to be way more than it wuz in real life as i said before.spino wuz just a 45 ft fish eater with practicly NO jaw strength and practicly NO inteligence.in jp1 the Dilopho wuz cool and had a few extra sweat ass features to make it better.in jp2 a little car wuz pulling up 2 huge trailers.in jp2 the dinos at the end of the movie were about 70 ft away from eachother but they wern't even looking at eachother.in jp3 Billy wuz attacked by a few pteranadons and he wuz being ripped to shreads and being gored by them yet he escaped with a broken arm and a few little scratches and somehow he managed to get Grants hat back.in jp2 a girl kicked a full grown raptor into a spike need i say more?in jp3 the spino was burned by fire,almost killed by a small T-rex,probably shot a bit by the guys when they first arrived on the island and he wuz gored by a large plane propeller.how wuz it still alive?in jp3 pteranadons opened a steel door that wuz shut.in jp1 there were just 2 probs.the t-rex eye thing which wuznt shown much and a few extra cool features on the dilophosaurus.in jp3 the spino seemed to change size from about 30 ft to 50 ft because of screwy computer animation.i rest my case Jimmy u ass ramming dick muncher
At 4:04:24 PM on 7/24/2002, Mattman said:
I think I like 3's raptors the best, because they were the most bird like. The first film's raptors looked too much like lizards, imho.
At 12:27:46 PM on 7/24/2002, Trev said:
Jimmy, you only have five friends...go get more, fag.
At 12:20:19 PM on 7/24/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
I agree the raptors were to smart in all three films. I meant effects wise the raptors were more realistic and I loved the raptors feather crests. They should have had more feathers then that but some feathers are better then nothing.
At 9:01:58 AM on 7/24/2002, jpvengends said:
Jurassic Park = the Original, and still the best.
Lost World = worthy sequel
Jurassic park 3= Total garbage.
At 4:35:58 AM on 7/24/2002, underdog738 said:
Um you guys im confused but u no when Grant did that thing with the raptor chamber and the raptors left but here is how a percieve it. I dont know if u do as well so here goes:
When Grant blew the thingie the raptors poised because they were confused, one raptor wished to attack but the Alpha Male denied it (was it the A male) Paul said 'call for help' then Grant imitated their call for help. Again the raptors were confused and as they heard the helicopter whirrs in the background they thought that one of their own was in trouble (remember they probably thought a helicopter was a carnivore) and so they left them. To me imitated call from Grant sounded distant but i am hearing impaired and it may have been louder.
Feel free to submit ur own theories.
At 1:40:29 AM on 7/24/2002, Mattman said:
Thanks Vinsfeld for your advice, but I was siding with everyone's right to have an opinion. Maybe you should read my post again?
At 12:19:09 AM on 7/24/2002, RaptorVinny500 said:
At 7:40:33 PM on 7/22/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
The mainland invasion of Jurassic Park 4 should happen the same way it happen in The Lost World. What do you mean the raptors looked like shit. The raptors get more realistic with every new film.
the raptors get more realistic with every film?? the raptors are way too fucking smart in jp3. the raptors in jp1 had the perfect level of inteligence, and the ones in TLW LOOKED the best, so if they combined those 2, the raptors in jp3 would have been much better. and real raptors would probably kill the humans after they got the eggs back.
At 11:32:57 PM on 7/23/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Yes the sequals have problems. In the The Lost World it was Kelly. In Jurassic Park 3 it was where Billy survived that pteradon attack also the pteradons teeth. I don't care about the car thing and in no way did Spino ruin Jurassic Park 3. What about the dilophasaurs frill. We know they didn't have those frills so why did the movie give them those frills. Also the dilophasaurs spit looked like tar. The sequals have problems but not as bad as the first.
At 10:47:47 PM on 7/23/2002, mr elliesattler said:
Well said jp-freak. The first JP is the best ever.
At 8:47:56 PM on 7/23/2002, jp-freak said:
ooooooh!!big words little man!is jp1 to scary for u to watch or something.the vision thing wuz wrong and i addmit that but it did not even come close to ruining the movie.spino itself ruined jp3 and the fact 1 small car wuz pulling 2 huge trailers from a cliff ruined jp2.(of course these didn't ruin the movies but it makes about as much sense as Jimmy's exuse for not liking jp1 that much) i prove my point.case closed now Jimmy SHUT THE HELL UP!!
At 5:26:19 PM on 7/23/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Jurassic Park 3 is awsome so shut up.
At 12:58:26 PM on 7/23/2002, superdino said:
That's what watching Jurassic Park 3 does to you.
At 12:46:21 PM on 7/23/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
I never actually said suspense was a bad thing. I don't consider vision based on movement.
At 6:05:24 AM on 7/23/2002, underdog738 said:
I no this is my 6th or so post in a row but i am amzed at Jimmy, how old are you. I am just 14 and i can piece together the facts, the t-rex did not attack because 1) it had vision based on movement 2) It had eaten a goat and might have been full (i dont no how much they eat)
3) Suspense is a great thing in movies
and by the way JP-FREAK i forgot *clap* *clap*, great job in rebuttal.
At 6:00:43 AM on 7/23/2002, underdog738 said:
jp-freak, i can't believe it. Lol u manages to sum up every single fault in the trilogy (i think) except for when the pteranodon bursts through the door, i can't remember that one so next time u post can u tell me where that scene is.
At 5:57:20 AM on 7/23/2002, underdog738 said:
I dont know if u guys noticed this but Jimmy they knew the t-rex was coming when it burst through the wall. When they climbed the electric fence they heard a t-rex roar, now consider the scene between the and the t-rex-through-the-wall scene and it makes sense, the t-rex must go around building rather than climb them so it would take a fair while to reach the main center.
At 5:54:30 AM on 7/23/2002, underdog738 said:
Sorry Raptor Strike i copied u, but i hadn't read ur post so i didn't know u had already stated it.
At 5:52:27 AM on 7/23/2002, underdog738 said:
I know alot about echolocation Jimmy and its' a fact that a bat does not use its eyes, echolocation bounces of surrounding environment and through the ear canal and gives the creature a sketch of the area. And it is possible for a t-rex to have vision based movment in that movie, they cloned it with a frog and i think (remember i think) they can only see movement.
At 5:49:16 AM on 7/23/2002, underdog738 said:
Trev i think it's pretty cool you want to be a director, im gonna be a writer,hehehehe. Maybe my story could be a movie....(im thinking out loud)
At 11:27:16 PM on 7/22/2002, Vinsfeld said:
Mattman, side with jimmy, and you side with the devil. don't do that or suffer the fate of your father, you will.
At 9:23:09 PM on 7/22/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Exactly I like movies by how enjoyable they are and how much they make sense. Vision based on Movement makes no sense.
At 9:07:39 PM on 7/22/2002, Mattman said:
Trev, just cuz someone doesn't agree with your opinion doesn't make them wrong. Jimmy likes TLW and JP3 better than JP. His opinion is not wrong. You can't tell him that JP is better when he thinks the sequels are better. I don't happen to agree with him, but that is only MY OPINION. He has a right to his, I have a right to mine, and you have a right to yours. It's not a matter of right and wrong. It's a matter of preference.
Btw, I like them all.
At 8:19:19 PM on 7/22/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
They should have run. Standing in front of a t-rex and surviving is one of the dumbest ideas ever. It is so dumb that it ruined the first movie. Sure I didn't want the rex eating all the charactors but they should have thought of a better idea then giving it vision based on movement.
At 7:44:55 PM on 7/22/2002, Vinsfeld said:
Jimmy, did you not watch the movie at all? What happened when they all ran? they all got eaten in some form or another. What happened in jp when grant and kids didnt move, they survived. So don't talk unless your being chased down by a gigantic, small armed, enormous jawed dinosaur (and im not talking about your grandma) and you run like the pansy that you are.
At 7:41:34 PM on 7/22/2002, Vinsfeld said:
well said, lets give jp-freak an applause *claps hands*
At 7:40:33 PM on 7/22/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
The mainland invasion of Jurassic Park 4 should happen the same way it happen in The Lost World. What do you mean the raptors looked like shit. The raptors get more realistic with every new film. In Jurassic Park a man was able to stand in front of a t-rex without being eaten. Though the human charactors did unfortunly and stupidly meantion vision based on movement it didn't have the rex stand there and not attack the way the first did because the charactors did what they should have done. RUN.
At 6:43:57 PM on 7/22/2002, jp-freak said:
P.S dont change the subject just because your WRONG!!!
P.P.S it would not make "senese (as u would say) to put the dinos in the mainland.How the hell would they all get there?
P.P.S your a monkey seducer that dips nachos in cum and eats shit spread on bread
At 6:40:58 PM on 7/22/2002, jp-freak said:
Jimmy u fucking retard!!by the looks of it u havn't even watched jp1.In jp2 the raptors looked like shit,in jp3 they made spino out to be WAY more than it should have been.in jp3 Pteranedons opened a steel door.in jp2 the t-rex on the boat would not go into the bridge, eat everybody and go back into the pen.in jp2 a tiny car was pulling up 2 HUGE trailers from a cliff.in jp3 a kid survived on a dino infested island for what, 9 weeks?!?!,in jp2 at the end of the movie all the dinos were about 60 feet away from eachother and they wern't even looking at eachother let alone fighting,in jp3 a fish eating dino killed a powerfull T-rex with its flimsy hands at weak mouth (used for scooping fish),in jp2 the rexes vision wuz also based on movement (didn't u wonder why Malcom kept on saying dont move?) its just everyone wuz running,need I say more?
At 5:45:22 PM on 7/22/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
I love the San Diego scene that scene rocked. Dinos terrorizing the city is the coolest that scene is how Jurassic Park 4 should be. It also makes senese and is the best ending in the Jurassic Park series by far.
At 5:41:15 PM on 7/22/2002, mr elliesattler said:
Jimmy shut up! The whole idea of the t-rex not being able to see non-moving things is used in maybe two scenes! It does not ruin the movie! And I can't remember how many times people have argued about the rex and the visitor center thing on this site. It's not a big deal. Besides, it beats the hell out of the gay San Diego crap in TLW!!!
At 5:36:43 PM on 7/22/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
One problem doesn't make Jurassic Park a bad movie it just makes the sequals better.
At 5:18:07 PM on 7/22/2002, Trev said:
GOD DAMNIT YOUR SO FUCKING RETARDED!
In a commercial for JP, they show the Rex busting through a hole still being constructed on the side of the building.
AND IF YOU DON'T WANT TO SEE ANY MUTANTS, DONT WATCH JP MOVIES, JACKASS!
At 5:15:32 PM on 7/22/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Raptor Strike that just shows that the Jurassic Park t-rex isn't a real t-rex it is a genetic mutant. I want a real t-rex not a mutant.
At 5:11:51 PM on 7/22/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
I care about the dinosaurs. What the first movie did to the t-rex was stupid, unscientific, and inexcusable. If you care about plot I consider that a plot hole. Jurassic Park ruined the t-rex. The Lost World had the rex being the awsome unstopable hunter I wanted him to be. Also how can a t-rex walk into the vistor center without making a sound or being noticed. PLOT HOLE.
At 5:09:45 PM on 7/22/2002, Trev said:
Damn straight, Raptor Strike, damn straight.
At 5:06:34 PM on 7/22/2002, Raptor Strike said:
*frog not frod
At 5:06:00 PM on 7/22/2002, Raptor Strike said:
*is not us
At 5:05:10 PM on 7/22/2002, Raptor Strike said:
Jimmy, bats can't see well at all. That's why they use echolocation. It's a proven fact that when bats are returning to their cave they wont use echolocation because they know where everything us, therefore if you change something around in their environment they will fly into it. And many frogs and toads have vision based on movement. That's where the whole concept came form. That does make sense in the movie because they used frod DNA to fill in the gene sequence caps.
At 4:45:11 PM on 7/22/2002, Trev said:
All you do to judge a movie, is body count, and CGI, THAT ISN'T RIGHT! THATS BULLSHIT! THAT IS NOT WHAT A MOVIE IS!
You don't appreciate movies for what they really are, and it pisses me off.
At 4:38:47 PM on 7/22/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
I make my opinion of a movie by how much I enjoy them. I to appriciate filming as an art. What does that have anything to do with how much you enjoy a film.
At 4:35:14 PM on 7/22/2002, RaptorVinny500 said:
Jimmy is such a fucking retard. everyone except you agrees JP1 was the best of the series. everything about it was better. and the reason 20 people got killed in TLW is becasue of 1. the t-rex in camp scene, 2. the raptors-long grass scene, and 3. the san diego incident other than that only eddie and the compy guy (deiter?) died.
At 3:27:36 PM on 7/22/2002, Trev said:
Jimmy, your so goddamn retarded, it hurts my soul. I ask you that question, because you dont appreciate films for what they really are, AN ART!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Now, go fuck yourself, you stupid faggot.
At 3:24:18 PM on 7/22/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Bats can see very well. Blind as a bat is an incorrect term. Bats also use echolocation that allows them to see there position using sound. If a bug goes in front of a bat the bat can see it and eat it. Same with all predators who actually hunt or scavange. Dead animals don't move how would it scavenge. As for your question it is such a dumb question. Your question should have been "Why don't you know what a good movie is" not real film thats the stupidest thing I ever heard.
At 1:26:32 PM on 7/22/2002, Trev said:
ANSWER MY QUESTIONS, YOU STUPID FUCK! I say something about your opinion, and you completely change the subject. Damn you.
BTW: "Its just commen sense that in order for an animal to hunt it must know where it is going"
What about bats?
And btw: ITS SUSPENCE YOU STUPID QUEER, AND THE VISION BASED MOVEMENT IS ONLY IN THE MOVIE FOR 10 MINUTES!
At 12:27:17 PM on 7/22/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
I would say that all three were equal if there was no vision based on movement. I hate that idea because it is stupid and there is absolutly no chance of it being true. Its just commen sense that in order for an animal to hunt it must know where it is going. Even if that vision movement crap is true which its not the rex would have smelt them and eat them. It would not stand there.
At 9:44:45 AM on 7/22/2002, Trev said:
Jimmy, REAL movies are the following:
Plot
Acting
Directing
Emotion
Suspence
Love
This is what YOU consider what a real movie is:
Action
SFX
NO-suspence.
Your an idiot. You argue about things, which can't be argued. I <i>want</i> to become a Director, so therefore I know about what film is. I dont know what the fuck you want to be, and I could really care less, but it's obvious that whatever it is, it has NOTHING to do with American Film.
Now please, if your going to argue about American Film, do it with your five friends...
At 4:52:47 AM on 7/22/2002, underdog738 said:
I loved JP1 for the suspense, i liked the sharp shocks (when the raptor jumps out at Ellie in the electric room, thingie) and the graphics. Of course i saw it when i was 5 but i still like it today, it is GROUND-BREAKING everyone says and they're right. I just wish for JP4 to be as equal as JP1.
At 4:47:31 AM on 7/22/2002, underdog738 said:
Trev u r right! Movies are about, plot, emotions etc. And just so you no i'd like to tell you i think JP1 was better than all. JP3 i liked and same with JP2, onlyif a movie absolutely fails to fill such important categories such as the ones mentioned then i classify it as half a star.
At 4:45:07 AM on 7/22/2002, underdog738 said:
Trev remember we are worlds apart, im in Australia and ur in the US. There may be different reveiwers ya no and here in Aus the reviewers said JP3 was better than TLW. US may be different i dunno but that's what our ones said.
At 1:37:57 AM on 7/22/2002, Raptor Strike said:
shut the fuck up.
At 11:34:46 PM on 7/21/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
I don't understand that question. It is a very stupid question. I understand what a real film is. A real film. Everything that is filmed is a "real film" unless it is imaginary and the movie doesn't excist then it is not a "real film." LOL
At 10:24:56 PM on 7/21/2002, Trev said:
Jimmy, why do you NEVER seen to answer my questions?
Answer this:
WHY DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT REAL FILM IS!?
At 10:23:35 PM on 7/21/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Graphics ,action, and less vision based on movement. A major factor is also number of deaths. The more death the better. The Lost World advantage over the other two is in 1 and 3 four people get eaten in The Lost World over twenty guys get eaten. Jurassic Park 3 was the most fast paced of the three which is its advantage.
At 10:02:16 PM on 7/21/2002, Trev said:
Jimmy, you like sequals for the following reasons:
Graphics, and action.
It is FACT, not opinion, that JP, is better than JP3. Your opinion is that of a 12 yearold, that gets straight F's. You have NO idea what film is, and stop wasting your time on a film site...
At 9:06:03 PM on 7/21/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
I have listed so many reasons why the sequals are better yet when I list one reason at a time you always say that is the only reason I think so.
At 8:08:28 PM on 7/21/2002, Trev said:
THE SPINO IS A FUCKING FISH EATER, YOU DUMBASS PIECE OF SHIT!
Who gives a fuck if the dinosaurs look better? JP's graphics were groundbreaking.
BTW, Jimmy, I now officially hate you with every fiber of my being.
At 8:00:03 PM on 7/21/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Spinosaurs is not a fish eater. The t-rex was male if the rex had been female it would have won.
At 7:58:45 PM on 7/21/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
By realism I mean how realistic the dinosaurs look not the story.
At 7:34:15 PM on 7/21/2002, Trev said:
Jimmy, faggot, homo, enemy, you REALLY think JP3 had more realism than TLW and JP?
So a child living 8 weeks on a dinosaur infested island, is realistic to you?
A man jumping off of a small cliff, opening a parachute, and flying over to pick up a kid on another cliff, is realistic to you?
A fish eater, with a less-capable jaw, snapping a T-Rex's neck, is realistic to you?
Your a dumbass, Jimmy. Your an idiot when it comes to film, and an even bigger idiot when it comes to natural sense...
At 7:15:33 PM on 7/21/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
While I agree with you guys in saying Jurassic Park 1 had the best acting of the three. Every new Jurassic film has twice the realism of the previous one. If you think the first had best effects you are either blind or retarded or both.
At 7:07:55 PM on 7/21/2002, Raptor Strike said:
despite the fact that there wasn't a lot of realism in JP3. the spino was a fish eater so i don't think that he would have been able to snap the rex's neck, the raptors are still way to big, the pteranodons didn't have teeth in real life, etc.
At 7:05:12 PM on 7/21/2002, jp-freak said:
so a good movie means nothing to u?jp1 wuz more realistic that the other 2 by a country mile!jp1 had the best graphics, acting, ending and story then the other 2.jp1 also had more suspence too.
P.S Im glad yer not dead but yer still a cum for brains pig fucker.
P.P.S In case u didn't know im lickmaster/mega-rex and im gonna insult u more than ever because u made me look like an ass.i said i wuz glad u were dead and everyone got pissed off at me.
At 6:50:00 PM on 7/21/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
So action, realism, and number of dino shots, and scientific accuracy, mean nothing to you people. Those are the factors I look at first.
At 6:40:27 PM on 7/21/2002, Trev said:
I dont wish he was dead, but I wish he realized his stupidity...
At 6:20:31 PM on 7/21/2002, RaptorVinny500 said:
hahahaha trev remember he has 5 friends! lmao
we all wish you were dead.
At 2:37:28 PM on 7/21/2002, Trev said:
Shut up, Jimmy, your a dumbass. You know NOTHING about filmmaking.
At 2:34:36 PM on 7/21/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
I go to Six Flags for a few days and everyone thinks I am dead.
At 2:33:04 PM on 7/21/2002, Raptor Strike said:
that's so pathetic that it's not even funny. just because the rex has the vision based on movement thing, doesn't mean that the other 2 movies are better. you must be one of those people that thinks that mindless and retarded action movies are the best in teh world.
At 2:32:51 PM on 7/21/2002, Trev said:
ITS SUSPENCE YOU DUMBASS!!!
And you just basically proved everything I said before...
At 2:27:36 PM on 7/21/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
The sequals have more action, better effects, and less vision based on movement which I hate so much. I hate what the first movie did with the t-rexs vision that drives me nuts. The first still has best acting but I like to see people get chased by dinos not people standing in front of the t-rex and it not attacking. In the sequals when they meet the t-rex it chases them it doesn't stand there.
At 1:45:40 PM on 7/21/2002, Trev said:
Where the hell do you get reviewers said JP3 was better than TLW?
They were considered the same.
<a href=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/JurassicParkIII-1108705/>JP3's reviews</a>
<a href=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/TheLostWorldJurassicPark-1077068/>The Lost World's Reviews</a>
Now, my views on JP3 are pretty bad:
Whatever happend to movies being more than crappy fast-paced action? I dont know, and it's pretty obvious Joe Johnston doesn't either. Jimmy, and others, you guys need to learn, movies arent about action, they're about showing a piece of emotion. They're about telling others what you feel. And as of late, movies haven't done that in a LONG time. Today, the movies that have the most action, get the most money...is this a good thing? FUCK NO.
Now, I'm sure Jimmy doesn't care about acting, or plot, I'm sure you could just have 7 people appear on an island, and have dinosaurs chase them, and he'd think it was the coolest damn thing he's ever seen.
I CARE ABOUT PLOT/ACTING/DIRECTING/SCRIPT! It's what makes a movie, and it's what makes a GOOD movie. JP3 had NONE of this.
TLW isn't that much better either, but, the plot was there, and so was the directing.
So, if you think TLW and JP3 are better than JP, because of graphics, and action, you can go fuck yourself, because TLW AND JP3, ARENT REAL MOVIES.
At 12:35:36 PM on 7/21/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
The Lost World and Jurassic Park 3 are better then the the first Jurassic Park in my opinion.
At 12:08:03 PM on 7/21/2002, jmock5 said:
If they could make JP4 up to standards with what JP1 brought us, I would be simply amazed.
At 11:00:39 AM on 7/21/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
One year wow. I have seen Jurassic Park 3 like 20 times this year. It is an awsome fast paced film.
At 1:04:12 AM on 7/21/2002, underdog738 said:
jmock5, ur completely right. Reviewers said that JP3 was better than TLW. BUt that is only minor, if they can get the same formulaic movie like JP1 than i am pretty sure it could rival some of the best movies ever.
At 10:42:16 PM on 7/20/2002, jmock5 said:
I thought JP3 was great. Yeah it didn't have a plot but still it was much more fun watching it than The Lost World. No if they could only mix action WITH plot.
At 9:58:24 PM on 7/20/2002, underdog738 said:
Also it could means ur a smart person but ur ACTING like something else. You get wat im saying.
At 9:57:39 PM on 7/20/2002, underdog738 said:
Trev i didn't say u WERE a dickhead i said u r acting LIKE a dickhead. Meaning that you acting something that ur not which therefore means (which way ur see it) i am complimenting you.
At 12:43:05 PM on 7/20/2002, jp-freak said:
jp 3 wuz good now if u exuse me i have to listen to Hulk Hogans music "I am a Real American"
At 11:48:58 AM on 7/20/2002, Trev said:
You say it's not a hostile remark, yet you use dickhead? Riiight.
I came here, I said what I wanted to say, you contradict my opinion, your gonna get it smeared in your face again. That simple.
(BTW: What happend to movies being an artform?)
At 4:53:52 AM on 7/20/2002, coder78 said:
The worst movie i have ever seen and thought was pointless was The Scorpion King. JP3 did rely to heavily on action and had no brains to support. But everybody had an opinion and fine say u hate it but it won't change America (US, whatever) or the rest of the world.
At 4:51:41 AM on 7/20/2002, coder78 said:
Trev if you are awaiting a JP4 then they have an entire section on JP4, go there if you want and there is no need to act like a dickhead. It wasn't a hostile remark even if you may have read it that way. (this is not a hostile remark as well)
At 2:41:49 AM on 7/20/2002, Driveshaft said:
Jp3 was probably one of the worst movies I've seen out of the past 10 or so I've seen in the theater.
At 12:21:45 AM on 7/20/2002, KillerRaptor said:
<i>Love it or hate it, you gotta admit that 90 minutes spent watching JP3 is more entertaining that 90% of the movies out there these days. </i>
I hate JP<i>///</i>. And I strongly feel that the action movies deaing with more dialogue, plot, and character interaction then just heavily relying on action and sound are better then JP<i>///</i>. Movies like JP<i>///</i> that only go by action <i>suck</i>.
At 11:47:02 PM on 7/19/2002, nublar said:
I´m very happy about the fact that this site continues gathering JP fans and I wish it will last for many years more!
HAPPY BIRTHDAY JP3!!!!
I´m also happy because tomorrow (july 20) is the 9 anniversary of the first time i saw JP back in 1993 and I have loved all about JP since then.
¡Felicidades a las 3 películas de JP desde México!
At 11:26:03 PM on 7/19/2002, Trev said:
1) I registered at this site 2 years ago, awaiting JP3.
2) I'm here awaiting JP4.
3) Your an idiot.
At 7:16:39 PM on 7/19/2002, underdog738 said:
Was JP3 that great....to me yes. A great thrill with new sequences (because of spino)and the interesting adaptation of pteranodons from JP1 (THE BOOK) to JP3 so it was well done. However, the plot wasn't so great some of the acting was really bad (Will H. Macy on the plane, you can see him actually wanting to fall off the plane)but he didn't do that badly, Trevor Morgan' screaming seemed a little awkward but yeh the JP did well with this one but next time i advise...to GET A BLOODY SCRIPT. JP3 is my favourite of the franchise, JP1 coming in second.
At 7:10:08 PM on 7/19/2002, underdog738 said:
Trev is JP3 sucks so much then 1: why did you sign up to this special JP3 site and 2: Why r u on it.
At 4:51:23 PM on 7/19/2002, jp-freak said:
and i hope he isnt dead.again i apologize.as i said before i thought it wuz a stupid dumb fucking rumor that sum shit headed ass ramming dick muncher started.I know if a member of my family died i would be incredibly sad.Jimmy,if yer out there im sorry
At 4:44:02 PM on 7/19/2002, jp-freak said:
what, did he actually die or something?i thought it wuz just sum stupid rumor going around.if he did i apologize
At 1:16:02 PM on 7/19/2002, iiiiii said:
I know, that stupid fucking prick. I hope a rabid chimpanzee with a dull rusty blade castrates the fucker! Remove his impotence from this earth that shit mark.
At 10:43:06 AM on 7/19/2002, bigoledork said:
Respect is a lost art, and nowhere more so than on the Internet.
At 8:24:30 AM on 7/19/2002, iiiiii said:
Jp-freak, next time you say some IGNORANT shit like that, imagine if it was you <b>GAPING VAGINIA</B> mother. You inconsiderate shit. Just cuz no one cares about him here, doesn't mean he doesn't have his family, a g/friend ad friends. Asshole, I'll be awaiting <font size="4">YOUR</FONT> car crash....
At 8:24:19 AM on 7/19/2002, iiiiii said:
Jp-freak, next time you say some IGNORANT shit like that, imagine if it was you <b>GAPINH VAGINIA</B> mother. You inconsiderate shit. Just cuz no one cares about him here, doesn't mean he doesn't have his family, a g/friend ad friends. Asshole, I'll be awaiting <font size="4">YOUR</FONT> car crash....
At 4:09:54 AM on 7/19/2002, Neelis said:
JP-Freak: that is not a very nice respons on the (possbile) news that someone has died. I think you should apologize. And I do hope Jimmy has nót died. This world is bad enough after all.
At 2:08:58 AM on 7/19/2002, Raptor Strike said:
You're happy? Come on, that's not right. Yes he may have been a pain in the ass, but he was still a person.
At 10:46:04 PM on 7/18/2002, joey-trib said:
Dan, I think maybe you are being too generous to JP3, I mean, even Gosford Park did better financially.
At 9:37:20 PM on 7/18/2002, jp-freak said:
but if he did im happy
At 9:37:02 PM on 7/18/2002, jp-freak said:
no
At 8:29:47 PM on 7/18/2002, Vinsfeld said:
i got an email from someone saying jimmy 345 died thats why he hasnt been posting, i was just asking to see if anyone else got emails.
At 7:59:58 PM on 7/18/2002, jp-freak said:
HAPPY FIRST BIRTHDAY JP3!!!!!
At 7:39:06 PM on 7/18/2002, joey-trib said:
gross
At 6:40:14 PM on 7/18/2002, AREX said:
De parte de toda la comunidad hispana aficionada a la saga Jurassic Park:
Felicidades JP3!!!
At 5:33:44 PM on 7/18/2002, mr elliesattler said:
JP3 is awesome!!!!!!!!!!!!
At 5:13:00 PM on 7/18/2002, Mattman said:
I loved JP3, and totally agree with Dan's statement. I've found it difficult to be anywhere near as entertained by the movies this year. JP3 is a fantastic thrill ride, nothing more, nothing less. It's not trying to be Dances With Wolves.
At 1:09:51 PM on 7/18/2002, Neelis said:
Someone died? That's bad.
At 1:04:22 PM on 7/18/2002, pteranofan said:
Happy Anniversary JP3. The acting was simple, dialoge was cheesy, the plot was stupid, and the ending wasn't exactly equal to JP1, but heaven help me, I still love this movie.
P.S. Vinsfield, what do you mean when you say Jimmy died in a car crash?
At 12:43:22 PM on 7/18/2002, General Rancor said:
<font color=red>1 year since the spino ate Tea Leoni...</font>
At 12:25:56 PM on 7/18/2002, jpvengends said:
I think we should be in mourning, not celebrating, Jurassic Park 3 killed a great series.
At 10:59:02 AM on 7/18/2002, heeheemonkey said:
Happy Birthday JP3!
At 5:19:49 AM on 7/18/2002, underdog738 said:
Oh yeh, sorry can't pay yeh. I'm in Australia.
At 5:18:25 AM on 7/18/2002, underdog738 said:
Raptor hiss i'll bak u on that one. Lovers vs haters. Let the war begin, hey lets see if we can get to 100 posts before say....7:00PM tomorrow
At 4:26:01 AM on 7/18/2002, Vinsfeld said:
*ps is it true jimmy died in a car crash?
At 4:25:36 AM on 7/18/2002, Vinsfeld said:
happy new year!! (sort of)
At 3:49:17 AM on 7/18/2002, Aussie Embryo said:
yeah, doesnt seem like 1 whole year at all.....probably coz i didnt see JP3 till august 31.
At 2:30:53 AM on 7/18/2002, Drakkenfyre said:
I cannot believe it has already been a year, it does not feelt like it, does it?, a year ago I was standing outside the theater at 7 in the morning waiting to get the first ticket, which I still have, and see the first showing, I went on to see it 4 more times that day and did not watch the final showing simply because I ran out of $, (actually, it will be one year in a few hours, but I am not going to be posting here then, lol)
-Drakk )))
At 11:41:40 PM on 7/17/2002, Trev said:
This will be the first, and LAST comment I post on this section:
JP3 sucks. Its crappy action, with no acting, or plot.
Ovi is fat. Real fat. With no friends, and no life.
And if you don't like TLW, than you suck.
At 9:51:17 PM on 7/17/2002, RaptorHiss said:
Five bucks says this comment section turns into a Jp3 haters vs. lovers
Any takers?
I only take personal checks, money orders or credit card payments. Out of country payers, a small fee will be added
At 8:37:14 PM on 7/17/2002, the ARK said:
Yeah!!!
At 8:32:12 PM on 7/17/2002, Oviraptor said:
Dan didn't even do one for TLW's Birthday, guess that shows how he feels about it.
At 7:38:57 PM on 7/17/2002, Icebreaker said:
<font color=steelblue><i>Love it or hate it, you gotta admit that 90 minutes spent watching JP3 is more entertaining that 90% of the movies out there these days</i>
I think you meant people gotta admit that 90 minutes spent watching JP3 is nowhere near as entertaining as 90% of the movies these days...</font>
At 6:14:50 PM on 7/17/2002, JPExciter said:
happy movie b-day. I raise my glass to Sam Neil.
At 3:49:40 PM on 7/17/2002, Sinraptor said:
Happy B Day JP3!
At 2:55:17 PM on 7/17/2002, Mr Goodbytes said:
I feel silly for wishing a movie happy birth day, but I'll do it anyway. Happy B Day JP3!
At 12:54:34 PM on 7/17/2002, bigoledork said:
So, do you love John Diehl or hate him? And why?
At 12:54:12 PM on 7/17/2002, _jurassiraptor_ said:
Eloquently put, Dan.
Here's to JP3, looking forward to JP4.
At 12:14:03 PM on 7/17/2002, Evilgrinch said:
I could sit there watching John Diehl die all day.
JP3 ROCKS!!!!
-Evilgrinch
Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment
|
|
Add DJP3P to your newsreader!
|
