|
|
[ Log In ] [ Register ]
 means the user is online now!
no
At 6:24:08 PM on 7/11/2002, lickmaster said:
u should probably just shut up now.yer making yerself look terribly stupid.yer a dumbass because of the 1970's thing now just shut up before u report u to a mental institution for being so fucking stupid ur considered mental
At 4:28:45 PM on 7/10/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Why does liking Spider-Man make me a dumbass.
At 5:42:08 PM on 7/9/2002, lickmaster said:
Jimmy yer a true example of a dumbass.
At 3:41:11 PM on 7/9/2002, Dark Element said:
Your a dumbass. They've been argueing about who's had rights to the movies since the 70's. They just found out who had rights in 1999, you mother fucking cum guzzler.
At 3:12:39 PM on 7/9/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
They would have made it back then but we didn't have the technology until the mid 1990s.
At 8:35:46 PM on 7/8/2002, lickmaster said:
since the 70's? ur not only a cum guzzling homo but yer a dumbass too. need i say more?
At 7:20:35 PM on 7/8/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
You are wrong. I loved Aliens it rocks I own the DVD. They are making a 5th film too. Dark Element you act like they didn't have enough time to make Jurassic Park 3. They had four years. As for Spider-Man they had that movie planed since the 1970s. You oviously aren't a fan of the TV show otherwise you would not be saying this stuff about Spider-Man.
At 4:36:48 PM on 7/6/2002, lickmaster said:
The Alien movies were fuckin wicked.Jimmy probably didn't like them.Jimmy has a weakness for horrible movies.
P.S the Xenomorph Queen in "Aliens" was the fucking coolest thing ever (at least untill jp 1 came out)
At 11:02:01 PM on 7/5/2002, Dark Element said:
I like action movies. I like action movies that are thought out, and not slapped together for a summer release (*cough*JP3!*cough*)
Like Alien, and Aliens, awesome movies!
Spider-Man's acting was so terrible, that it litterally hurt my soul.
At 6:41:42 PM on 7/5/2002, lickmaster said:
hahahahahaha U GOT 5 FRIENDS LOSER!!!what a cum bucket!
At 1:25:43 PM on 7/5/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Spider-Man was a very intelligent. It is not a dumb action movie. You just hate action in movies. All you care about is the acting. Spider-Man had fine acting too.
At 7:33:21 PM on 7/3/2002, Dark Element said:
Spider-Man is terrible. The only reason you get the backup here, is because Spider-Man is an action movie...and guess what? This is an action movie's message board!
BTW: You only have five friends!? WHAT A COMPLETE LOSER!!!! ROTFLMAO!
At 3:53:30 PM on 7/1/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Spider-Man rocks DVD coming November 15
At 11:37:07 AM on 6/30/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
It is spelt Spider-Man but you agree it rocked.
At 6:35:35 PM on 6/29/2002, mikeymike said:
i know i mayu hate this but.
i aggree with jimmy
i love spider man
At 10:55:57 PM on 6/28/2002, GenRptrVinny500 said:
who else wants jimmy to shut the fuck up.
At 5:37:00 PM on 6/28/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
I wanted a Spider-Man movie to come out since I was three. I was not dissipointed on its awsome coolness. The best Marvel movie ever. It was even better then X-men. I don't care if you don't like it. I would like to hear from someone else that it sucked.
At 5:22:53 PM on 6/28/2002, Trev[not a mod] said:
It SUCKED. The acting is terrible, the dialogue is stupid and cheesy, the SFX suck. Just shut up, Jimmy, and go find some friends.
At 1:42:33 PM on 6/28/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Spider-Man was not brainless. It was good action action action. The plot of the movie followed the old comic book series (except the web coming out of his skin) and was very exciting. Like I said most people agree with me.
At 12:17:16 PM on 6/28/2002, Trev[not a mod] said:
I hate crappy-brainless action movies. And the fact that you only have FIVE FRIENDS IS HILARIOUS! I had more than that when I was 3!
At 11:34:58 AM on 6/28/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Why do you hate action movies. Why is the fact that I have friends funny.
At 10:56:13 PM on 6/27/2002, Ben_[Admin] said:
<font color=skkyblue> I like making fun of people at their own misfortunes too.
Oh wait...
--Ben, Admin--</font>
At 10:53:30 PM on 6/27/2002, RaptorVinny500 said:
FIVE FRIENDS LMFAO!!!!!!!!!
I EVEN DOUBT THAT!!!
At 10:27:18 PM on 6/27/2002, Trev[not a mod] said:
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FIVE!? FIVE!?
LMAO!!!!
GOOD SWEET GOD, THATS THE FUNNIEST THING I'VE EVER HEARD! ROTF!!!
At 7:39:06 PM on 6/27/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Like you know anything. All of my real friends like Spider-Man. Thats because it is a good movie. Everybody else except you seem to think so. I don't know why you hate action movies that is just not normal. I do have friends five of them.
At 11:12:47 PM on 6/26/2002, Trev said:
Because, your an annoying piece of shit...AND THATS ON THE INTERNET!
And who is, "All of them?" All of your imaginary friends?
At 7:15:53 PM on 6/26/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
How do you know how many friends I have do you know me I do have friends. All of them like Spider-Man. DVD coming November 15.
At 7:07:06 PM on 6/26/2002, lickmaster said:
Jimmy has just been shot down!!burn baby burn!!
At 4:06:08 PM on 6/26/2002, Trev said:
You have no friends. You never will. The reason Spider-Man got good reviews, there hasn't been a good comic book movie in a LONG time. Or a good Action movie for that matter. Any Comic Book movie is good.
BTW: Your a mother fucking dumbass piece of shit. With no taste. You violently rape your Dog at night. And your frequently molested by your father.
At 12:10:02 PM on 6/26/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
1.I do have friends
2. I have read a list of reviews and almost all are positive.
3. I saw it and it was fantastic.
4. You are a dumbass.
At 5:27:16 PM on 6/25/2002, Trev said:
Jimmy, how would you know? You have NO friends. Nobody likes you. Your only "friends," are the people you talk to on here. And the people on here like Spider-Man, because this is an Action Movie website. And guess what? Spider-Man was an action movie!
Shut the fuck up.
At 3:45:21 PM on 6/25/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Your the only one who thinks so. Your the idiot. Spider-Man rocked it had tons of non-stop action.
At 2:16:21 PM on 6/25/2002, Trev said:
BTW: This is Dark Element.
At 2:16:05 PM on 6/25/2002, Trev said:
Stop arguing. Spider-Man was a retarded teens movie. Your an idiot, thats why you liked it. Idiots like you like, no-ploted-retarded action-bad acted- pieces of crap like Spider-Man.
At 6:47:58 PM on 6/24/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
I never saw it but it looks good. Spider-Man rocked.
At 3:19:46 PM on 6/24/2002, Dark Element said:
Have you seen, INSOMNIA, or Minority Report? Those are what movies are all about. Stop talking Jimmy, because you have no idea what your talking about.
At 2:30:54 PM on 6/24/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Spider-Man was fantastic and most people agree with me.
At 3:04:29 PM on 6/22/2002, lickmaster said:
Im sick of u.
At 2:52:42 PM on 6/22/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Dark Element I am sick of you bashing Spider-Man. Spider-Man rocked in almost everyway. I just didn't like the end otherwise it would be perfect.
At 11:15:54 PM on 6/21/2002, lickmaster said:
I know wht u mean. Hitchcocky my ass!!
At 4:37:50 PM on 6/21/2002, Dark Element said:
"I for one thought that it was filled with suspense. I mean, I dont know about you pseudo-turtle neck dawning-preps, but it was one of the best movies ever. I think it was almost Hitchcocky! And the kiss, oh wowdy wow wow!"
If you ever compare Spider-Man to ANY of Hitchocks films, I will litterally kill you.
There was NO suspence throughout the ENTIRE film. Shut your mouth, you have no idea what your saying.
At 6:53:01 PM on 6/19/2002, mega-rex jr said:
(sarcastic) GREAT INSULT!!!
im not even going to dignify that with a response other than this
At 1:49:43 PM on 6/19/2002, I Love Mrs Pots said:
And Mega-rex arent you a little young to have borrowed daddy's computer?
At 12:25:02 PM on 6/19/2002, I Love Mrs Pots said:
I for one thought that it was filled with suspense. I mean, I dont know about you pseudo-turtle neck dawning-preps, but it was one of the best movies ever. I think it was almost Hitchcocky! And the kiss, oh wowdy wow wow!
At 6:44:39 PM on 6/18/2002, mega-rex said:
Jerky 345,u r a stupid piss bag dipped in a barrel of cum and then u had some shit spread on u with a knife
At 7:30:04 PM on 6/16/2002, Dark Element said:
It sucked. The action was mindless, the acting was terrible, the graphics licked balls, and it just wasn't fun. I dont know why people chose Raimi over people like Christopher Nolan. It boggles the mind.
At 5:23:22 PM on 6/16/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
Spider-Man rocked. It had non-stop action, a great story, mild comedy, and a cool villin. What else do you need.
At 4:04:48 PM on 6/16/2002, Dark Element said:
Why is it that since Spider-Man people think Sam Raimi is the greatest director? Spider-Man wasn't even that good. Raimi doesn't go up there with, Fincher, Hitchcock, and Kubrick. I just dont get it.
At 8:06:58 PM on 6/15/2002, Spino Will Die said:
i agree 100% with ludacris, its my favorite series of all time over JP by a fraction. Spielberg is the greatest director of all time with Lucass and Sam. Im not really looking foreward to a JP4. I mean, i will go and see it, but not to expect anything great. Back to the future lies where it is and i hope Mike gets better.
Role on Indy
At 6:25:00 PM on 6/15/2002, Ludacris said:
back to the future is the greatest movie ever!!!
besides jp of course
At 5:23:01 PM on 6/15/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
ET is not that bad. It just isn't one of my favorites.
At 3:52:47 PM on 6/15/2002, raptor2000 said:
thats what i said, he said he like JP3 and TLW over JP and that cant be true unless youre a dumbass...maybe he did mean it lol
At 3:04:06 PM on 6/15/2002, ellersaur said:
Sometimes he just says stuff to piss everyone off, without really meaning it. I mean, that's got to be it - who in the HELL doesn't like ET?! It's a modern-day classic!!
At 2:15:19 PM on 6/15/2002, Dark Element said:
"I don't like E.T or Close Enconters so this makes no difference"
God damnit, will you just not talk? Just don't even come here anymore, nobody likes you, and nobody cares what you have to say. Cock.
At 12:57:20 PM on 6/15/2002, ellersaur said:
I just want them to announce this damn thing officially. I can wait until '05 to see it, but I just want to know that it's being made.
At 9:42:01 AM on 6/15/2002, Symbiote Spider said:
Wow. So there is going to be a JP4. Hmm. Awsome.
At 2:15:26 AM on 6/15/2002, mrprongs01 said:
SeanArcher, Doc meant he already went to the future, and got a hover conversion for the train, as shown by its flying into the air, and heading into time. Logically, he mut be heading back to 1885 (well, however many years past that technically), having only wanted to rest Marty's fears that he had died. Remember, he said he loved the old west best. Course, the cartoon had him living in 1985, and had ther Delorean restored. Go fig.
Anyway, back on topic, There's no need for an E.T. 2 or a CEOTTK2. They're stand alone stories. BTTF is limited to just the train as a time amchine, and a lot harder to hide than a car. A plot would require the Browns to return from the past, and discover a new problem in the future, which'd just be a rehash of the second. So the story kind of ends nicely, even though a fourth would be great. But the cartton filled that need in me. Indy and JP can have more stories, though believably Indy can go on and on. JP is pushing the so called 6 rights pics.
At 12:00:38 AM on 6/15/2002, mr elliesattler said:
I am an evil sith lord.
At 9:08:39 PM on 6/14/2002, raptor2000 said:
Indy 4 will come out in 2005, JP4 no one knows if they are even making it. E.T. is a great movie so shut up.
At 8:54:43 PM on 6/14/2002, Jimmy 345 said:
I don't like E.T or Close Enconters so this makes no difference. No Back to the Future 4 was a dissipointment but I guess its for the best. I still am looking forward to Jurassic Park 4 and Indiana Jones 4. Both will probably come out in 2005.
At 8:30:52 PM on 6/14/2002, mega-rex said:
GO JP4!!
At 7:14:57 PM on 6/14/2002, Dan said:
Pretty sure the quote from the Saturn awards was as it is on the front page: i.e. no mention of JP3. I think Garth is assuming (like me) that he meant besides Indy and JP4.....
-Dan
At 5:07:28 PM on 6/14/2002, Jurassiclaw said:
He said that before TLW and he even directed the movie.
At 5:05:12 PM on 6/14/2002, Oviraptor said:
I just know what www.darkhorizons.com posted, I didn't hear it myself.
At 5:02:31 PM on 6/14/2002, SeanArcher said:
Oviraptor, what did he say exactly at the Saturn Awards?
And no more Back to the Futures... that sucks. I always thought it was possible because of the way Doc says "Nope. Already been THERE..." What the heck was he talking about?
At 4:58:36 PM on 6/14/2002, tobycompy2.0 said:
<font color=Brick red>All of those movies that he just said would ruin the original ones if he made sequels, I couldn't imagine a close encounters 2. Oh, well we can hope that Jp4 will be the last sequel that he makes. (Indy 4 will probably come out before JP4)</font>
<font color=Brick red>
-What you just witnessed was the bite of the compy. Goodnight</font>
<font color=Silver>The Timeline of the Gun - July 4</font>
At 4:49:30 PM on 6/14/2002, Oviraptor said:
He said at the Saturn Awards that IJ4 & JP4 will be the only other sequels to his films.
Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment
|
|
Add DJP3P to your newsreader!
|
