|
|
[ Log In ] [ Register ]
 means the user is online now!
spinosaur
At 8:20:43 AM on 8/9/2000, godzilla2000 said:
notice the name TAN GO
At 7:55:44 AM on 8/9/2000, graboid said:
70 godzilla websites sites say the 1998 one
RRRRRRREEEEAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLYYYYYYY
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSTTTTTTTTTTTTIIIIIIIII
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNKK
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
At 9:22:25 AM on 8/2/2000, graboid said:
after the 1998 stinkfest i prefer the legend of boggy creek
At 9:28:16 AM on 8/1/2000, graboid said:
bet you don't know WHAT A GRABOID IS !!!!!!!
I'ts a TREMORS WORM
At 1:31:32 AM on 7/30/2000, Oviraptor said:
I say the dinosaur is a spinosaurus... I mean no one is going to know what a Suchomimus is..
At 1:05:28 AM on 7/30/2000, Cherry Picker said:
and one more thing, i think the writers (in my opinion) would use a dino that is a little bit more well known to the average person...im not saying that everyone knew what a velociraptor or gallimimus was before jp, but my point is, i doubt that they would use suchomimus a relatively new find over say spinosaurus or baryonyx...im also saying this inlight of the fact that nedry did pass by the embryo of a metriocanthosaur in jp. still, if i were a writer, given the creative additions of jp (dilophosaurus' frill and venom), i would take a relatively well know dinosaur like spinosaur, and give it some editing, ie larger sail and a modified skull...although..if there is debate over my skull comment, even TANGO mentioned in a rater long conversation that there are several sub species of spinosaurus with the curled lip shaped skull.....phew!!!
At 12:54:15 AM on 7/30/2000, Cherry Picker said:
I havent posted any opinions lately, but i have a new angle on the whole baryonyx.suchomimus/spinosaurus deal. If you think about it, when did jp come out? 93 or 94. when did tlw come out, 97 i think...and when was suchomimus discovered? 1997 by Paul Sereno...now...if Jp3 is going to be a prequel, then how could they even concieve of putting a suchomimus into the script if the dinosaur, which would exist in 1996, not even be discovered yet...my point being....if time and the continuity of time has any bearing on the way the jp universe progresses, then putting a suchomimus in jps (presuming it is a prequel to tlw) would make complete and utter nonsense....(its a lot harder to explain what im thinking in cohesive and understandable speech than you think :) )
At 10:25:29 AM on 7/28/2000, JP Animal Control said:
Did you see the preview for Godzilla 2000? I did and, it looks awful!!!!!!!!! Godzilla looks just like the one from a long time ago! MAN IN SUIT!!! When are they going to make Godzilla 2? ( the american version) Godzilla in 1998 was ok, but still JP and TLW is much better!!! I quess so Tango that little kid isn't worth it! JP Animal Control over and out.
At 2:07:03 AM on 7/28/2000, Tango said:
Don't worry about him JP ANimal Control. He's the same little kid who uses the name graboid and giganotosaurus. And I just found out... Godzilla 2000 is actually coming to theaters?!?! Give me a break.
At 12:03:44 PM on 7/26/2000, JP Animal Control said:
Wargreymon do you even no what a message board is? A message board is where people write their opinons. All of this stuff is oppions. Let people write their opinons. Bye the way wargreymon have you ever heard of a thing called " FREEDOM OF SPEACH"? JP Animal Control over and out.
At 5:05:58 PM on 7/25/2000, wargreymon said:
you idiots better SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
At 8:38:51 PM on 7/21/2000, JP Animal Control said:
Opps! I missed spelled a word, it should be most likley insted of must likley. JP Animal Control over and out.
At 8:35:45 PM on 7/21/2000, JP Animal Control said:
Hi, i'm new here. I just bought the Jaws 25th Aniversery edition VHS, and i saw the preview for the Jurassic Park/The Lost World DVD. The logo is diffenernt. But it is not a T-Rex. I think it's a Baryonyx. If you look carefully, the dinosaur has the same head as the old logo ( that is the old JP3 logo), and it has three fingers, while the T-Rex has two. I don't know if any one else knew that. They must likley did. I also dont know if i reapeated someone else. If I did, I'm sorry! I just like to add JP ROCKS! JP Animal Control over and out!
At 4:26:20 PM on 7/21/2000, graboid said:
yeah buddy
At 11:54:57 AM on 7/20/2000, Tango said:
eh... Were you suggesting that we were actually pondering over the possibility that the logo could be Godzilla?
At 10:33:30 AM on 7/20/2000, giganotosaurus said:
godzilla 2000 is coming and the dino doesnt look
at all like him if you need to see what i mean
go to www;fandom.godzilla.monster zerodefault
At 10:27:25 AM on 7/20/2000, giganotosaurus said:
because i looked at both logos
At 8:51:11 PM on 7/19/2000, Baryonyx said:
They just want to make the logo cooler so it will atract people. Cooler and diferent. Thats all. I myself like the original jurassic park logo brtter than TLW logo or the JP3 logo.
At 8:18:51 PM on 7/19/2000, Digalot said:
enough with the dino's lets focus on the other parts of the logo, like why is it in a metallic form instead of the lW crumbly stone or the regualar logo of jurassic park?
At 8:17:11 PM on 7/19/2000, Digalot said:
listen I doubt they are going to add another flying dinosaur in when we already want to see more on the pteronodon which they have already introduced so the flying reptiles are most likely pteronodons
At 4:16:23 PM on 7/19/2000, Tango said:
No offense, but of the three animals we've mentioned (Sucho, Spino, and Bary), why would you think that its Baryonyx? Baryonyx doesn't have a sail. Just curious.
At 11:31:42 AM on 7/19/2000, graboid said:
i think its baryonyx
At 11:02:49 AM on 7/19/2000, Joxer said:
Tango- You have a good point.
I guess we'll have to wait for official word to settle this :)
Actually, the DVD logo looks like no Spinosaur I've ever seen. It's head is too short, and it's hands lack thumb claws (which probably Sucho and Barry both had). In my opinion, it looks more like those OTHER kink-snouted theropods the Coelophysids/Dilpohosaurs...
The other possibility is that they are making up a dinosaur without really making one up. There are some Spinosaurs known only from fragments and teeth. Maybe they're saying, "Well, maybe a Siamosaurus looked something like..." scribbles a mix of Spino/Sucho/Barry, "THIS!" :)
At 3:57:24 AM on 7/19/2000, Utahraptor said:
With two writers, maybe they changed main dino. Perhaps they made a tets logo and wanted to see fan reaction, so they put it on the DVD. Then made a decision, and went with the new one. Remember, the JP ending was changed two weeks before they shot it. No reason to think they couldn't change the logo many times over before settling on the Sailback. Course, I still don't really care what dino it is, as long as it's real and not a Chaos Effectesque one. If they added some extra's ala Dilophosauurs, fien with me.
At 5:43:05 PM on 7/18/2000, Tango said:
Just thought of something interesting. Universal was obviously somewhat satisfied with the proto logo to put it in the DVD trailer right? But then they obviously changed it into the logo that we're all familiar with now. In the proto-logo (even though it has the T-Rex body) we are given this new head and arms which clearly make it look like a Baryonyx or Suchomimus, plus it does not have the sail that is familiar to the official logo. The proto-logo obviously shows no relation to Spinosaurus. Then Universal creates the logo we're all familiar with, and it has a new body, along with large thumb claws and a sail. So now we know that the animal obviously cannot be Baryonyx, but still could be Suchomimus and now could also be Spinosaurus. My point is that of all things that they could have left out in the proto-logo, they left out the sail, then in the official one we get a sail. A sail of course is critical to Spinosaurus. So if it is Spinosaurus, why would they leave out such an obvious and needed feature in the prototype after they went through with the trouble of creating the head and arms? My thought is that the sail we see in the new logo is an act of artistic licensing on a Suchomimus. Suchomimus has a sail, but since it begins further back on the creature, they simply brought it closer to the front a little. Well this is some damned fine speculation if I do say so myself. :) My point being is that I just don't understand why that when creating the proto-logo (if its a Spinosaurus) that they would leave out the needed feature of the sail before they released it on the DVD trailer.
At 4:19:33 PM on 7/18/2000, Joxer said:
Just to settle this sail-or-no-sail thing *ahem, Gladiator6k*, I give you this link from the best dino site on the net-
http://dinosaur.umbc.edu/genera/suchomimus.html
Note the fact that- "This baryonychine had a two-foot-high sail over its hips. Some think it may be the same as Baryonyx."
There you have it. The sail is negligable. Spinosaurus logo all the way! :)
At 1:08:21 PM on 7/18/2000, Baryonyx said:
But spinosaurus did not have it's sail begin that close to the neck. It began in the middle of the back and got bigger, like a half sail. If They added more sail to it then it woud be going overboard with the adding.
At 12:08:11 PM on 7/18/2000, giganotosaurus said:
i gotta question what do yah think it is then
GODZILLA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
At 4:14:33 AM on 7/18/2000, Oviraptor said:
Hey good point Goldblum... unless the logo morphs.. from a t-rex too the new dinosaur.. like people have been thinking.
At 3:28:38 AM on 7/18/2000, GoldblumRules said:
It's almost as though nobody even knows at Amblin what kind of dinosaur it is, not if there are two different logos like that. Kind of disturbing... If Stan Winston is building this thing and with a matter of weeks before filming, you'd think they would know if the new dino had a sail on his back or not.
At 2:56:32 AM on 7/18/2000, Utahraptor said:
Rhamphorhynchus had a long, triangle tipped tail, and these have no discernable tail (like Pteranodon. Maybe the bigger sail was added like the Dilo frills. The giant Raptors were "created" but even bigger ones were found. It could be the basis for making a new dino, just because one like it "could" be found. I just doubt they are doing that. It's a real dino, maybe a bigger sail. Much more beleivable.
At 1:13:28 AM on 7/18/2000, Allan_Grant[Vacancy] said:
I think it seems like a easter egg. If you get the logo and "smash" horizontally it with a graphic editor, the barionyx turn a T-Rex.
At 12:27:44 AM on 7/18/2000, Baryonyx said:
I'v don a little homework on the logo. The one with the spine IS a spinosaurus there is no other dono that looks like that. Other donos had a sail but the spinosaurus was uniqe. The sail is very big and the head of the creature moves strait forward insted of a long neck. The logo is definetly a spino. I have no clue what the other one is.
At 11:38:29 PM on 7/17/2000, Gladiator6k said:
ok, retards, sochomimus did have a sail on its back, and yes the pterosaurs are probably quetzalquatles or whatever
At 6:49:32 PM on 7/17/2000, Oviraptor said:
Yeah and also Carnotaurus had horns.. and very little arms...( alot smaller than t-rex's ) which the logo dinosaur has no horns and bigger arms. and it surely didn't have no spine sail on it's back. and for Megaraptor.. like you said the head is completely different and so are the arms.
At 6:07:30 PM on 7/17/2000, Joxer said:
Ok, just wanted to add a few things here...
I think those pics of the old logo all over Universal means it's the official one. As for the new one, well it DOES look more like Suchomimus then the old one. Suchomimus DID NOT have a sail/hump whatever on it's back. The only spinosaur with a sail like that is Spinosaurus. My opinion is that the official (older) logo's dinosaur is Spinosaurus, and that they added thumb claws to it to make it seem cooler (the way they added frills to dilophosaurus and 5 feet to Velociraptor).
Just a few other facts/opinions...
The logo dinos can't be Carnotaurus or Megaraptor. If they are the producers are seriously altering dino anatomy, since the logos could not possibly look less like those two dinosaurs. Carnotaurus had a very short, bulldog like snout with no kink. Megaraptor, like all other raptors, had very long winglike arms with hands that faced the side of the body palms in. The only non-spinosaurs with skulls remotely like the logo are the ceolophysids/dilophosaurs.
Finnaly...
The pterosaurs can't be ramphorhincids (which had long tails). They are probably Quezalcoatlas, the largest pterosaur, wich had crests like pteranodon but much smaller.
Hoping the ceolurosaurs have feathers this time,
Joxer
At 3:51:20 PM on 7/17/2000, Oviraptor said:
they'll be dinosaurs we haven't seen in the other 2 movies in JP3 ... the logo one won't be the only new one....
At 3:19:21 PM on 7/17/2000, Baryonyx said:
Ok Im not saying that I want this movie to be some old 50s si-fi. all I said was that it woud be cool to have a new dino. non of the stuff that we are talking about is probobly going to happen in JP3. the dino on the logo will be in the movie, but the rest will be the same as always. Im sorry but it's the truth, seqwules are always the same thing oh hear comes the t-rex again. they olny make seqwules to make more money. Some times I think that JP shoud have just been the first book Jurassic Park no moive and no second book. the olny reson I like to see sequles is becouse some times they are originl, but in a sence they are never originl.
At 12:55:28 PM on 7/17/2000, Tango said:
Fools eh? Well you sound assenine. And I've never heard of the pterosaur you listed. I assume you were saying Rhamphorhynchus, but I doubt that it is that animal because they are too small. Judging by the size of the trees in the logo, the pterosaurs would have to be large.
At 12:01:57 PM on 7/17/2000, giganotosaurus said:
the pterosaurs are rhampschornishus
At 12:00:31 PM on 7/17/2000, giganotosaurus said:
Look fools the 2 logos shw baryonyx
and suchiomimus ppppppppplllllluuuusss
they also eat fish
At 7:57:57 AM on 7/17/2000, movieboy3 said:
i'm not saying they are going to morph dinosaurs to make a new dinnosaur!!! I am simply saying that they will use the film technique of the morph like a fade to show the evolution of the jp logo over the 3 films. I seriously hope they dont make up a dinosaur. It has always carried the chance of it really happening because it is based loosly in reality. Like it COULD happen. Making up a dinosaur makes it science fiction that could never be science fact. Do you know what i mean???
At 3:04:30 AM on 7/17/2000, Utahraptor said:
I hope it's not a morph, becasue adding to it "Evolution Of Adventure", they might just make an X-Menasaurus.
At 11:50:11 PM on 7/16/2000, sucho1 said:
yeh brontosaurus is really apatasaurus, because apatasaurus was found and then later on someone found the brontosaurus but then later relized that they are the same so the correct name is apatasaurus.
At 11:17:07 PM on 7/16/2000, Tango said:
I realize that. New skeletons on average are found every 14 weeks. I'm just saying that if they were to do that then it would be a major dissapointment that they had to create a dinosaur instead of use one of the many that science knows today. And there is no such animal as a Brontosaurus.
At 8:46:46 PM on 7/16/2000, Baryonyx said:
I know there are many grate dinoes out there. No it woud not be ridiculous to have at least one dino thats never been discoverd by man. I think it woud be cool. When they take blood from a misqeto you cant just say it's a raptor or a brontosaurus unles you know what the DNA strand looks like. When hammond and his scietists first saw the DNA of a t-rex they didn't know what it was until they saw the t-rex. So it's not imposible to have found a dino that man has not discoverd. New dinos are discoverd all the time.
At 6:47:02 PM on 7/16/2000, Tango said:
I seriously doubt that they'll do something like that. To make up a dinosaur when we have so many great dinosaurs to use is ridiculous. But on the other subject of the pterosaurs, I'm not exactly sure what pterosaurs those are in the logo, but I'd say that they're Pteranodons, because I believe I can just barely makeout a distinctive bone-crest coming out of the back of the first pterosaur's head.
At 6:04:41 PM on 7/16/2000, Baryonyx said:
What kind of terosaurs are at the bottom of the logo?
At 5:57:55 PM on 7/16/2000, Baryonyx said:
Maby it's a unknown dinosaur that man does not know of yet. In other words it's made up.
At 1:59:25 PM on 7/16/2000, sucho1 said:
actuqlly that could be true because it looks like its inbetween the t-rex and sucho or bary, like they are morphing the lost world into jurassic park 3 logo
At 10:33:43 AM on 7/16/2000, movieboy3 said:
ok! lets think about this people!!! At the LICENCING SHOW in NEW YORK! they showed the logo for jp3 that we have seen for a while now. NOT this new one. they wouldnt change it suddenly. Also the posters are up at Universal studios so lets just take this new logo as a developmental one. OK?
At 10:18:28 AM on 7/16/2000, movieboy3 said:
i think that for the trailers that will be released in cinemas they will start with a jurassic park logo morph it into the lost world logo and finally morph it into the new jp3 logo. I think that the pic in the trailer is in between morphes from TLW to JP3. Thats my opinion anyway.
At 3:34:10 AM on 7/16/2000, Utahraptor said:
The trailer logo looks so funny. The T-rex thingie has no right being with extra stuff. The Logosaur one is much better, and believable. T-rex needs ot stand alone, but the Logosaur does look cooler, and not busier.
At 1:34:04 AM on 7/16/2000, Tango said:
Hey guys, just thought I'd fill ya in on some things here. First off, Dilophosaurus' spitting ability wasn't a mutation. Even though it was madeup for the film, its supposed to be a natural ability of the Dilophosaur. Second, Carcharodontosaurus means shark-toothed lizard because its teeth are similar to shark teeth. It isn't a water-dwelling animal, nor would it need to be around the water to depend on food. And thirdly, the animal in the logo is not an Allosaurus, Acrocanthosaurus, Giganotosaurus, or Carcharodontosaurus. The skulls of these animals don't come anywhere near in resembelance to the skull of the animal in the logo. This animal is definitley one of three: Suchomimus, Spinosaurus, or Baryonyx. I personally don't think its Baryonyx, but if I had to decide, I'd probably go with Suchomimus.
At 12:58:45 AM on 7/16/2000, shy_dino said:
i pray they don't use the logo from the video! it looks kind of childish! the first logo (of the sucho or bary or whatever dino it is) looks more vicious and cool!!!
At 12:01:37 AM on 7/16/2000, JP,LWFreak said:
It looks like some kind of mutation. Which would make sense considering TLW had a line of "mutated" dinos... plus, with the frog DNA they are mutated, and the ability for the dylaphosaurus to spit poison is another mutation. So I'm thinking that's what we're looking at. PLEASE NO GODZILLA!
At 11:11:53 PM on 7/15/2000, Digalot said:
ya it could be carcaridontisaur bacause that name mean shark tooth lizard and the new dinosaur is suppose to be a water creature
At 11:07:49 PM on 7/15/2000, shy_dino said:
i really really don't like the logo used in the video!!!! the first logo with the new dino with the spines looks much more vicious and cool!
At 10:24:22 PM on 7/15/2000, Embryo said:
Yeah I'd have to say this is a prototype logo, coz it looks kinda unofficial. And if you compare it to the original JP logo the spine is 100% exact to the Tyrannosaur. And seeing as to make this logo they start off with the original then they add things and format it. I'm guessing this is just the logo to give Spielberg and Johnson what the logo would end up like when the new dinosaur was placed there. The older logo (one with the big spine) is probably the official one, because it's been seen at UCS and at theaters.
At 9:35:49 PM on 7/15/2000, sucho1 said:
it could be gigantosaurus, or carcorodontosaurus
At 9:06:16 PM on 7/15/2000, sucho1 said:
it could be gigantosaurus, or carcorodontosaurus
At 9:04:47 PM on 7/15/2000, sucho1 said:
all i know is that the body is a t-rex or similar to the body on the other 2 logos, and the claws are neither rex, bary, or sucho because rex has 2 fingers and short arms and bary and sucho have large thumb claws, and the skull looks like a suchomimus just enlarged, anyways though i really hope this isnt the new one, though i highly doubt this is the new one anyways
At 8:16:56 PM on 7/15/2000, Digalot said:
well this this probaly rules out that jp3 will not be a prequel
At 8:14:14 PM on 7/15/2000, Digalot said:
ya it is probaly just the first prototype logo because when they were making the advertisment that was th only one floating around
At 6:40:20 PM on 7/15/2000, sucho1 said:
i bet it was an old logo, and the one on the right is the final official logo
At 5:36:45 PM on 7/15/2000, Baryonyx said:
I like the old logo better. This looks like a mutated t-rex. The other is alot cooler. No mayby It's an alosaurus. But then again probobly not the head is a little big.
At 5:35:14 PM on 7/15/2000, Mr Goodbytes said:
Final, sorry, I meant to say final not real
At 5:32:41 PM on 7/15/2000, Mr Goodbytes said:
I don't think that the second one will be the official logo. It looks stupid. The first JP3 logo looks much better and it is all over Universal Studios. I doubt that they would change it to this stupid thing. It doesn't even look like a real dinosaur. If it were Baryonyx, there would stll be the large claws on the hand. If it were Spinosaurus, Suchomimus, or Acrocanthosaurus it would still have the large spine. I don't think that this "new" logo is real.
At 5:28:19 PM on 7/15/2000, Oviraptor said:
I think anyone knows what a t-rex skull looks like even non dino or JP fans.. and why would non-JP fans go see JP3.. if they didn't see the other 2 why would they want too see the third movie...
At 5:00:52 PM on 7/15/2000, North2000 said:
I think a good portion of non JP fans will think it's a T-rex on the JP3 logo because it looks so similar to the T-rex.
At 4:48:57 PM on 7/15/2000, BJP3E said:
this new logo is just like that of the trex only the head and fingeres are altered
At 4:36:50 PM on 7/15/2000, Digalot said:
no that would spoil the fun
At 4:26:42 PM on 7/15/2000, Oviraptor said:
Also it could he suchomimus ... I wish they'd just go ahead and tell us what the dinosaur is already on the offical site..
At 3:46:02 PM on 7/15/2000, Oviraptor said:
that new JP3 logo looks alot like Baryonyx... and it doesn't have very big spines... so it can't be spinosaurs.
At 3:40:03 PM on 7/15/2000, Siege_6 said:
OK, it didn't even start downloading for me, and I too have Media Player.
At 2:42:08 PM on 7/15/2000, Digalot said:
I just took a picture of it and sent it to dan so he might post it on the new room hurray
At 1:44:15 PM on 7/15/2000, North2000 said:
My windows media player did play the JP commercial but it took a while to load and play, about 5-7 minutes.
At 1:28:28 PM on 7/15/2000, dinotrack said:
I took a pic of it, but how do you post a link or image in here?
-dinotrack
At 1:14:24 PM on 7/15/2000, Gladiator6k said:
can't anyone get a picture of it to post cuz the damn thing doesn't work even though i have windows media player
At 1:12:33 PM on 7/15/2000, Gladiator6k said:
ok, i have windows media player and it doesnt work for me, so what did the video have again?
At 1:09:18 PM on 7/15/2000, North2000 said:
It looks like they changed the logo just a little bit, I like it more now, but it looks even more like a t-rex now, only it has sharper/thinner teeth, and the head looks a little different than T-rex. This will probably be the final logo since it was in the commercial.
At 12:11:47 PM on 7/15/2000, dinotrack said:
They were just showing clips from the DVDs, they will have behind the scenes and making of the movies clips. They just chose that clip because that is the kind of stuff you'll see with the live JP3 link thing. But that clip you see in the trailer is just from the making of TLW.
-dinotrack
At 12:03:36 PM on 7/15/2000, Digalot said:
if you notice the logo dose not have the spines on it it has the t-rex body eith the head ayttached
At 11:41:44 AM on 7/15/2000, Chapter_11 said:
Why did it have a t-rex? Is that going to be the offical dinosaur? It was in the first two.
At 10:18:02 AM on 7/15/2000, dinotrack said:
That is just a clip from the making of TLW, it's just an unfinished t-rex. And they don't say "Spielberg's new dinosaur", they say dinosaurs, plural. So it doesn't have anything to do with the rumored new dinosaur.
-dinotrack
Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment
|
|
Add DJP3P to your newsreader!
|
